Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › Kadok Co (Becker kit problem)
- This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by
John Moffat.
- AuthorPosts
- May 16, 2017 at 4:28 am #386378
Kadoc Co manufactures a number of products, with cameras being produced in department C. The company draws up budgets for each department based on the fullest practical capacity, For the year commencing 1 January 20X9 the following budget has been formulated for department C:
Direct costs:
Materials 60 000
Labout 40 000
______
100 000Production overheads 100 000
Administration and marketing overheads 50 000
Full cost 250 000
Profit 50000
Revenue (from budgeted sales of 20 000 units) 300 000May 16, 2017 at 4:37 am #386379Production overheads are absorbed on the basis of 100 % of direct costs. However, half are fixed, while the remainder relate to the machining of the materials. The administrative and marketing overheads are based on 25 % of factory costs and do not vary within wide range of activity. For each department a profit margin of 20% is applied to the “full costs”, as this is felt to give a fair return on assets employed as well as to provide a reasonable reward for entrepreneurial effort. This also results in a price that appears to be fair to consumers. Halfway through the budget period it became obvious to the management of Kadok that there was going to be a shortfall in sales that could be expected to be 25% below the forecast. At about the same time that this shortfall in sales became evident, a chain of photographic shops shoed an interest in purchasing 5000 units of a special camera that would be stripped down to bare essentials and sold under the chain’s bran name Noxid. If Kadok were to produce such a model there would obviousely be a saving on the usual material and labour unit costs. The management accountant of Kadok estimated that materials costing $12000 and labout of $8000 would be required to produce the 5000 cameras.
As the production could place within the firm’s existing capacity, fixed costs would not be affected.May 16, 2017 at 4:43 am #386380REQUIRED:
(II) give computation showing the price that should be quoted for the order based on: price that would enable the original budget profit to be attained.extract form WORKINGS:
For the Noxid order to generate $37500 contribution to profit the price for the order must be:Materials 12000
Labour 8000
Variable overhead $12000*(50000/60000) 10 000
Variable cost 30 000
Contribution 37500MY QUESTION: how 37 500 was arrived at? and I didn’t get computation of Variable overhead – why 50 000 / 60 000
Please help to understand. Thank you.
May 16, 2017 at 1:05 pm #386457The fixed costs are 50% of the production overheads, and all of the admin overheads.
So a total of (50% x 100,000) + 50.000 = 100,000.
Therefore the budgeted contribution is 50,000 + 100,000 = 150,000.
Sales are going to be 25% lower than forecast and so the contribution will be 25% lower than forecast, which is 25% x 150,000 = 37,500.
This is the contribution that they need to make up from the new order.Half of the production overheads (so currently 50,000) are variable and based on materials (currently 60,000). So the variable overheads are 50,000/60,000 times the cost of the materials.
May 17, 2017 at 12:32 pm #386632Half of the production overheads (so currently 50,000) are variable and based on materials (currently 60,000). So the variable overheads are 50,000/60,000 times the cost of the materials.
Isn’t it easier just do it as 0.25% of total production costs?
May 17, 2017 at 3:16 pm #386665It might be easier, but it would be wrong!
Total production costs include some fixed overheads, and the fixed overheads will not change by definition!
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.