• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

June'14 question 1 – elimination of gains in parent

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › June'14 question 1 – elimination of gains in parent

  • This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 27, 2015 at 8:11 am #249449
    Anton
    Member
    • Topics: 14
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆

    Hello Mike!

    I would like to check with you if my understanding is correct on consolidation adjustments in June’14 in regard to:
    -elimination of revaluation of investment in Nathan ($5 mils). Is it eliminated because we report sub profits by consolidating them – so if we leave $5mils in parent’s profits it will be double count?
    -elimination of gain on sale of 8% in Nathan ($5.3mils). No clear at all. I know we do not report profits in cons P&L when we move from 60% to 52%, but how this rule is applicable to parent’s P&L?

    I am struggling to understand a printed answers.

    June 7, 2015 at 2:45 pm #254788
    Anton
    Member
    • Topics: 14
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆

    Hello Mike.
    I hope you will find time to confirm/correct statements I have made above.

    June 7, 2015 at 4:30 pm #254830
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23300
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The $5 needs to be eliminated – it’s internally generated recovery in the goodwill figure and should not, therefore, be recognised

    The $5.3 is not recognised because control is not lost – any gain is taken into account within the changes in parent’s equity – ie within the transfer between owners

    Ok?

    I have no idea how or why I missed your earlier post and for that I apologise

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Gowri7 on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Govere on The use of ratios and comparisons in auditing
  • John Moffat on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Gowri7 on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Ken Garrett on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in