• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

*** June 2025 ACCA AFM exam – Instant Poll and comments ***

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA AFM Advanced Financial Management Forums › *** June 2025 ACCA AFM exam – Instant Poll and comments ***

  • This topic has 15 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 6 hours ago by Robert.
Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 6, 2025 at 7:46 am #717684
    opentuition_team
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 1391
    • Replies: 1405
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    How was your June 2025 ACCA AFM exam?

    Vote in the Instant Poll


    (Comments will be opened after 5PM UK)

    June 6, 2025 at 12:54 pm #717726
    yuleawka
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    50 marks was ok, NPV of investment and cash flow forgone for parent company.
    25 marks was analysis of financial position and statement of profit and loss-easy but too much time takes to do all calculations, valuation-25 marks-I found it very hard. Cash flow to firm-but I think I never practiced like this before. I am with a feeling that I will sit it one more time 🙁

    June 6, 2025 at 1:19 pm #717727
    TuckerBrady
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 24
    • ☆

    Yes I had the same.

    Did well in Q1 which was ok.

    Q2 was so much information and didn’t go the best

    Q3 did okay

    June 6, 2025 at 1:56 pm #717730
    Robert
    Participant
    • Topics: 15
    • Replies: 58
    • ☆☆

    Mine was tough – q1 was a combination of valuation of debt, equity and capital, but using yield curves etc made it really tricky, then it moved into hedging using futures and a swap which was time pressured. Commentary sections were good tbf. Q2 was a bit different regarding calculating expected dividend using geometric averages and other info and then a detailed evaluation of dividend capacity. The final question was an absolutely awful business valuation. Couldn’t understand the requirement so will have scored very few marks for basic calculations but hopefully some OFR marks for then commentary and professional skills. Overall borderline … you know it’s tough when you look for your preferred question to ease into the exam … and there it’s not one !!!!

    June 6, 2025 at 1:56 pm #717731
    Robert
    Participant
    • Topics: 15
    • Replies: 58
    • ☆☆

    Mine was tough – q1 was a combination of valuation of debt, equity and capital, but using yield curves etc made it really tricky, then it moved into hedging using futures and a swap which was time pressured. Commentary sections were good tbf. Q2 was a bit different regarding calculating expected dividend using geometric averages and other info and then a detailed evaluation of dividend capacity. The final question was an absolutely awful business valuation. Couldn’t understand the requirement so will have scored very few marks for basic calculations but hopefully some OFR marks for then commentary and professional skills. Overall borderline … you know it’s tough when you look for your preferred question to ease into the exam … and there it’s not one !!!!

    June 6, 2025 at 4:16 pm #717733
    jayhelena
    Participant
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 52
    • ☆☆

    I thought the NPV question was so chaotic with the information provided – my answer was as chaotic but recognised the forgone sales but in the end I had so much negative cashflows I had nothing to apply to my 8% tax rate at the end with the bi lateral agreement – I know I messed up something but kept swimming- at this point was 1hr in with all the commentary left to go on Q1 – when I finished -(had to leave c and B part finished) I did wander if anyone managed to finish everything in the time given or if I was just struggling. Definitely was really tough Q1. by Q2 I was ready to tap out tbh. Q2 was so open on requirements it was a bit disheartening= got the trains. comparing the competitor etc and performance

    June 6, 2025 at 4:32 pm #717735
    heatherbs
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    I agree jayhelena- felt it was very chaotic, much more so than any of the practice papers! I found the whole paper challenging- thank goodness for the discursive train one. I think I picked up the majority of my marks there. Don’t think I will have passed this one!

    June 6, 2025 at 4:32 pm #717736
    heatherbs
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    I agree jayhelena- felt it was very chaotic, much more so than any of the practice papers! I found the whole paper challenging- thank goodness for the discursive train one. I think I picked up the majority of my marks there. Don’t think I will have passed this one!

    June 6, 2025 at 4:32 pm #717737
    Robert
    Participant
    • Topics: 15
    • Replies: 58
    • ☆☆

    Well done for not panicking and giving most of it a go. It really is a time pressured exam, and as much about trying to understand all the info and what’s needed. I really felt worried when I looked at all three question requirements and the amount of info. I just hope I pick up the professional marks and did enough on the first two questions to get me over the line with a part answered q3. Best of luck.

    June 6, 2025 at 4:35 pm #717738
    jkamalov
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    What ab m& a question, there was no share for share and no cash offer. Did u get question on why acquisition should not be done?

    June 6, 2025 at 4:55 pm #717740
    abi6767
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    @Robert , was your exam 11am BST time?

    June 6, 2025 at 5:02 pm #717741
    abi6767
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    Was this exam at 11am BST?

    June 6, 2025 at 5:29 pm #717742
    donboloski
    Participant
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    Q1 was about related with 10 marks of calculation of cost of debt, equity and wacc with given credit spreads.

    10marks were future hedge for investment and loan for swap

    the rest was discussion.

    I think yes q1 was good and i did okay.

    Q2 was about acquistion with share to share offer which the company have high gearing. Additional value created wanted to divided as 70/30 – it was also okay – but they also want that mezzanine loan for cash offer, i messed up there. I did some discussion and calculations but not sure how it was

    Q3 was dividend capacity but so complex and hard to define :/

    no npv or apv or good hedging :/ Like nightmare

    June 6, 2025 at 5:57 pm #717743
    jayhelena
    Participant
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 52
    • ☆☆

    Fingers crossed we do ok :3 important thing is that we did what we could and kept going through it 🙂

    June 6, 2025 at 6:29 pm #717745
    theimaginarynumber
    Participant
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 41
    • ☆

    There was no question on project appraisal in my exam. I thought it this was one of the topics that had to be included, along with risk management. Part A was a question on the cost of debt, equity and capital followed by a hedge and a swap, which was OK. The section B questions were atrocious. Dividend capacity and some random information about a potential acquisition. Appalling. Mezzanine finance? Pull the other one. But no NPV or APV question. I don’t get it. A disaster.

    June 6, 2025 at 6:36 pm #717746
    Robert
    Participant
    • Topics: 15
    • Replies: 58
    • ☆☆

    You had the same paper as me … I tink the cost of debt, equity and capital would be deemed the investment appraisal element … but I think that’s poor and it’s should be fully tested as indicated with a full question.

    I made some good points about mezzanine finance and these were well explained, except for they were not specific to the scenario which I didn’t understand. Hopefully I will pick up some prof skills marks and commentary marks and maybe a few basic calc marks but I gave up on those and just used assumed amounts after a certain amount of time …. Felt disheartening but probably the right technique

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Goodness on Accruals and Prepayments (part b) – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • mrjonbain on What is Assurance? – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • Ejueyitsi-Toju on What is Assurance? – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • sadik.sadka on How to make the best use of OpenTuition
  • SONIC916 on Lessee accounting – ACCA (SBR) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in