Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA PM Performance Management Forums › June 2021 ACCA PM exam was – Instant Poll and comments
- This topic has 149 replies, 39 voices, and was last updated 3 years ago by Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- June 9, 2021 at 6:13 pm #624226
Which budget dsnt take into consideration uncertainty was a qstn
Variance flexible budget simulation rolling budgetJune 9, 2021 at 6:15 pm #624229Then there was variance qstn in which there is no material price variance but the cost of material was 156000 so we had to calculate aq nd den material mix I guess anyone wth this qstn
June 9, 2021 at 6:17 pm #624231Cudnt attend sec c qstn compltely wch was to calculate weighted avg cs ratio. I got it smtg 60.9 I guess ?
June 9, 2021 at 6:23 pm #624234simran98 wrote:Did you get an ABC question in Section A?
We had to calculate total cost right?<br>How did you do it?<br><br>@agboolakenny84I had this one, I had no idea how to do it since the fixed overheads that apply to the machine hours werent given
June 9, 2021 at 6:24 pm #624236agboolakenny84 wrote:It’s Standard contribution. So yes budgeted contribution.
For this one I just followed what they had done for the example they had given
June 9, 2021 at 6:26 pm #624237pjashu1995 wrote:I got c/s ratio 58% and break even profit 7,200 per week, do you remember your answers?
I thought mine said to calculate breakeven revenue in $ not profit, but I might be wrong, I did my answer for breakeven revenue
June 9, 2021 at 6:34 pm #624242I also did breakeven revenue, I think it should have been fixed costs/whatever you calculated c/s ratio as
June 9, 2021 at 6:41 pm #624246Ahh great! although I thin I got my C/S ratio wrong, because I took my contribution as Gross Profit minus sales, which I am now realizing is probably wrong, hope they dont cut many marks…
June 9, 2021 at 6:41 pm #624247Variance is the answer. It’s actually in BPP/Kaplan Revision kit.
sshahin wrote:Which budget dsnt take into consideration uncertainty was a qstn
Variance flexible budget simulation rolling budgetJune 9, 2021 at 7:17 pm #624251I had no idea how to do this! They really didn’t give us much info did they? I know the gross profit margin is calculated as (sales – cost of sales)/sales so I just moved the equation around, but I think they only penalise for a wrong number once, not when you include it again in a calculation! So it should be okay
June 9, 2021 at 7:28 pm #624255pjashu1995 wrote:I got c/s ratio 58% and break even profit 7,200 per week, do you remember your answers?
Sorry i mean break even revenue,,, my bad…do you remember what is the answer i got 7,200 per week
June 9, 2021 at 7:33 pm #624257pjashu1995 wrote:I got c/s ratio 58% and break even profit 7,200 per week, do you remember your answers?
I think if gross profit margin is 65% then variable cost will be 100-65 that is 35% of sales…that is how i did it
June 9, 2021 at 7:39 pm #624260That is also what I did, because if you sub the 35% back into the gross profit margin equation for food you will get the 65% they’ve calculated in the question so I think that’s correct
June 9, 2021 at 7:41 pm #624261I did. What is your answer was?
June 9, 2021 at 7:42 pm #624262On the second point with the Faros restaurant q (the financial viability), I concluded that it wasn’t viable because the restaurant was making a loss rather than a profit. I can’t remember how many marks it was worth but I know that my proforma was really basic, I just had total sales with workings for the extra variable costs, the increased fixed costs and then the profit/loss. Would be interested to hear how anyone else approached it 🙂
June 9, 2021 at 7:42 pm #624263marinadal wrote:I did. What is your answer was?
agboolakenny84 wrote:Variance is the answer. It’s actually in BPP/Kaplan Revision kit.
I did. What is your answer was?
June 9, 2021 at 7:47 pm #624264pgargaro wrote:On the second point with the Faros restaurant q (the financial viability), I concluded that it wasn’t viable because the restaurant was making a loss rather than a profit. I can’t remember how many marks it was worth but I know that my proforma was really basic, I just had total sales with workings for the extra variable costs, the increased fixed costs and then the profit/loss. Would be interested to hear how anyone else approached it ?
I also suggested not to proceed with it i got profit but it is less than what they would get if they open for 5 days and did you take half capacity or full capacity in question they said after flood restaurant is running on half capacity with only 40 customers or something i took half capacity not sure if im right on it
June 9, 2021 at 7:53 pm #624266Yeah I only took 40 too, I missed that at first so had to go back and redo it ???? but I think (my memory is hazy now) I did 40 for the three days it was at 100% capacity and 70% for the other four, and then for calculating how much they spent I just split those numbers in half, so for the full occupancy days i did (20*however much set menu food cost) + (20*however much a la carte cost) and the same for the drinks.
For variable cost I already had the amount I’d calculated and then just worked out the number of customers a week and x that by $2 for the food and $1 for the drink to get the increase. and the fixed was just adding $600 or whatever the figure was.
I have never seen a question like that though so I have no idea if I approached it the right way, I just hope to get some marks for method!
June 9, 2021 at 8:11 pm #624273pgargaro wrote:Yeah I only took 40 too, I missed that at first so had to go back and redo it ???? but I think (my memory is hazy now) I did 40 for the three days it was at 100% capacity and 70% for the other four, and then for calculating how much they spent I just split those numbers in half, so for the full occupancy days i did (20*however much set menu food cost) + (20*however much a la carte cost) and the same for the drinks.
I did the same but i think we need to add $2 for existing variable cost….. From your msg i understood that you multipled $2 to existing cost.
June 9, 2021 at 8:15 pm #624274No sorry that’s not what I meant, what I did was x total customers by 2 and 1 respectively for extra VC and then add that back onto the total amount I’d already calculated previously, so I think we did the same thing
June 9, 2021 at 8:20 pm #624277pgargaro wrote:Yeah I only took 40 too, I missed that at first so had to go back and redo it ???? but I think (my memory is hazy now) I did 40 for the three days it was at 100% capacity and 70% for the other four, and then for calculating how much they spent I just split those numbers in half, so for the full occupancy days i did (20*however much set menu food cost) + (20*however much a la carte cost) and the same for the drinks.
Ahh I interpreted it differently, I interpreted that the consultancy firm in fact asked them to their original costs, for which we had calculated in section A, and in doing so, they would have these % as their occupancy, so the only change I made was the number seats for customers reduced to half, and fixed costs increased by the step increase. In this case I got a profit but a little less then the original one, so I said to accept. I ran out of time otherwise ideally I think I should have compared to the part of the restaurant wanting to increase their prices.
I thought I did well in this part C question, but now I think otherwise ………….June 9, 2021 at 8:27 pm #624278please don’t think you’ve done badly based on what I said! I have never done a question like that before, i have never even seen one in my revision guide or anywhere, so I could have approached it incorrectly (I wasn’t sure what to do so I just guessed)
June 9, 2021 at 8:55 pm #624283Guys who got the shadow price of material question in section B. I typed “0” as material was not a limiting resource. Is the answer correct?
June 9, 2021 at 9:10 pm #624288Machine hours were ro distract attention. Only inspections and smth. else should be taken ito account. I remember the answer was 91 point smth.
June 9, 2021 at 9:11 pm #624289JohnAcceek wrote:Machine hours were ro distract attention. Only inspections and smth. else should be taken ito account. I remember the answer was 91 point smth.
I got answer something like 74.6 or something it is in one of the option not sure but i got my calc right
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘June 2021 ACCA PM exam was – Instant Poll and comments’ is closed to new replies.