- This topic has 10 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by .
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Interactive BPP books for September 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › June 2014 q2 Burung vs DEc 2013 q1
Hi I’m a little confused about the tax allowable depreciation calculation in these two questions.
In dec 2013 q1 we added back the depreciation to arrive at the cash flow but in burung question we did not. Can you please clarify? Thank you
In Buring, the capital allowances have only been subtracted in the tax workings.
In the cash flows themselves, capital allowances have not been subtracted and therefore do not need to be added back.
Thank you
You are welcome 🙂
Is it that the both ways you will end up with the same answer?
Usually yes. The one time where you won’t is where there are losses which are carried forward against future profits. This has only happened once in the exam, but when it does happen then you have to calculate the tax on the profits after allowances separately.
Okay thank you again
Hi John,
Regarding issue cost, if it is 2% gross of finance required it means we have to calculate by x 100/98 to get the gross amount.
For calculating the tax shield and subsidy benefit, why don’t we calculate as per the gross amount?
Thank you
The wording is often ambiguous as to whether the 2% is of the gross amount or of the net amount.
Don’t worry about it. Just state what you have assumed and you will get the marks 🙂
Thanks John 🙂
You are welcome 🙂
