• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

June 2013 Q4 a

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FM Exams › June 2013 Q4 a

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 7, 2015 at 10:37 am #288433
    yushanshan
    Member
    • Topics: 84
    • Replies: 70
    • ☆☆

    Hi sir,
    I have trouble understanding at year 0 ,50/(1+4%)2=42.1 m. I think we should use 9% rather than 4% here because we are required to use div valuation model and div growth rate is 4% after year 3. By comparing with June 2012 Q4 , I am totally confused about div val model.I expect you can explain the differences between the two questions in detail to me. Thanks in advance:)

    December 7, 2015 at 12:41 pm #288469
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54717
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The dividend valuation formula is Po = (Do(1+g))/(Re – g).

    This gives the MV now (i.e. the PV now, since the MV is the PV of future dividends discounted at the shareholder required rate of return, Re).

    However, this assumes that the first dividend is in one years time.
    Also (Do (1+g)) is the dividend in 1 years time (the current dividend plus growth).

    In this question, content growth only starts in 3 years time (which is two years later than in 1 years time) and therefore the answer from the formula is the PV in 2 years time (two years later than the PV now). So the answer needs discounting by 2 years at the shareholder required rate of return.
    That is what the examiners answer has done – dividing by (1.09)^2 is discounting for 2 years at 9% (although more sensible would have just used the discount factor from the tables, which obviously gives the same answer).

    December 7, 2015 at 12:52 pm #288477
    yushanshan
    Member
    • Topics: 84
    • Replies: 70
    • ☆☆

    Thanks, I just found that the solution is right, but I wrote down a wrong number:(

    December 7, 2015 at 4:24 pm #288567
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54717
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    OK 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • finance123 on Investment Appraisal – NPV, IRR – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • actionj on Forward contracts – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • ahmad7861 on IAS 16 – Revaluation decrease – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • John Moffat on Budgeting part 4 – Cash Budgets – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • John Moffat on Forward contracts – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in