• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

June 2011-Q1 (part i)

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › June 2011-Q1 (part i)

  • This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 31, 2014 at 1:07 pm #172114
    peilin
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 19
    • ☆

    Hi John,

    I would like to ask if I am using an “average growth rate of operating profit margin” for Fodder Co in computing the Fodder cash flow for the next four years, will my answer gain any mark? The reason I used average growth rate of operating profit margin because I notice that the last 4 years of Fodder’s operating profit margin varies every year.

    Hence, my firm value will be $35m but the answer is $40m

    Thanks so much in advance!

    May 31, 2014 at 5:32 pm #172170
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54695
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You would certainly get some marks.

    However, the question does specifically state that the revenue will grow at the average rate of the last four years.

    (If the profit margin had stayed constant, then the operating profit would have grown at the same rate as well and there would have been no problem. As it turns out the profit margin did change and so you need to use an average here as well.)

    June 6, 2016 at 11:45 am #319823
    kaynatbukhari
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    Sir my question is while calculating average growth of four years, number of years ( n) as 3. not 4. why?

    June 6, 2016 at 12:10 pm #319841
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54695
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Because there are three years of growth!

    2008 to 2009 is 1 year of growth; 2009 to 2010 is a second year, and 2010 to 2011 is a third year.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • John Moffat on Objectives of organisations – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • alexgriff10 on Objectives of organisations – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • MidnightWolfie on Operating segments (IFRS 8) – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • John Moffat on Investment Appraisal Under Uncertainty: Expected Values (example 2) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Dinomain on Investment Appraisal Under Uncertainty: Expected Values (example 2) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in