• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

june 2007 Q.2(c)

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA APM Advanced Performance Management Forums › june 2007 Q.2(c)

  • This topic has 7 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by owenatu.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 22, 2010 at 11:18 pm #44056
    neeru
    Member
    • Topics: 12
    • Replies: 26
    • ☆

    anyone please help me out with this problem. “sensitivity analysis of the life cycle”.I tried to work out the answer but couldn’t figure it out. is there any specific formula for this.
    Please help me ASAP.
    thanking in advance.

    May 23, 2010 at 11:18 am #60840
    begum
    Member
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    what is the name of the question please?

    May 24, 2010 at 2:59 am #60841
    neeru
    Member
    • Topics: 12
    • Replies: 26
    • ☆

    The question is from june 2007 Q.2(c).and the name is Ice-Time Ltd….
    please help me out with it anyone …..

    May 24, 2010 at 4:52 am #60842
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 111
    • ☆☆

    I would rather classify the computation as a capital budgeting question because the core technique is NPV. The left cycle budget is merely to provide a scenario for analysis and discussion.

    Applying sensitivity analysis to capital budgeting in an examination setting is getting popular because sensitivity analysis is to evaluate the impact of risk factors. Further, sensitivity analysis could be tested also in P1 and P3.
    Sensitivity analysis, essentially, is a ‘what-if’ analysis. The purpose is to discover the sensitivity of the result to the change of each risk factor, given other risk factors unchanged. For example, we have 3 risk factors, sales price, advertising cost, and interest rate. The profit will become 0 if the sales price decreases by 2% (i.e.-2%), given the other 2 risk factors unchanged. The profit will be zero also when the advertising cost increases by 1% (i.e. +1%), or the interest rate by 3% (i.e. +3%). The profit should be most sensitive to the advertising cost, then to the price, and least sensitive to the interest rate.

    Applying it to NPV, the pivotal point of NPV is zero because it is the threshold to accept or reject a project. NPV is therefore the result. The generic risk factors in an NPV are positive change in initial outlay, annual cash outflows,and cost of capital, as well as the negative change in annual cash inflows, and investment time horizon. You should calculate the percentage change of each risk factor that will make the NPV become zero. For example, the initial outlay is $120. Now, you find that the NPV will become zero when the initial outlay is $140. The percentage change is ($140/$120) – 1 = 16.67%. In addition, the sensitivity of the NPV to the cost of capital is (IRR/Cost of capital) – 1. You can do the rest by applying the same logic.

    Further, you have to know the limitation of sensitivity analysis. Rather than giving the answer, let you think on it first.

    May 26, 2010 at 3:23 am #60843
    neeru
    Member
    • Topics: 12
    • Replies: 26
    • ☆

    thank u very much sosologos….i think i’ll get through it now..
    thankx once again

    June 3, 2010 at 7:54 am #60844
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    Thanks for the post above. How do you find out a what outlay figure will make the NPV equal to zero? – for example the $140 above – how is this derived?

    June 3, 2010 at 8:43 am #60845
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 111
    • ☆☆

    The NPV formula is NPV = ?DCF – Initial outlay.

    I assume that you have a project with an initial outlay and NPV of $120 and $20 respectively. Given a constant ?DCF, the initial outlay must increase by $20 (i.e. the existing NPV) in order to make a 0 NPV.

    June 6, 2010 at 8:57 am #60846
    owenatu
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    Dear Sosologos, this was helpful. Thank you. Help me Dec 2004 Q4 ii posted on the Forum. Woods Ltd

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • barbjohn on Equity Law, Ratio Decidendi – ACCA LW Global
  • Kakui on Equity Law, Ratio Decidendi – ACCA LW Global
  • Nicholas1239798 on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Starmoon123 on Strategy formulation (Part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • nosiphoceliwedlamini@gmail.com on Revenue – Example 5 (profitable contracts) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in