- This topic has 209 replies, 126 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by
.
- Posts
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
I includee 4,500,000 $ over draft in calculating gearing . is it right ? or the gearing is without overdraft?
@decentguy185 said:
I got cost of debt.. around 7%.. WACC >11.. Npv i remember was +2226 i think..
a{i} 2100 a{ii} 3900 (not sure 3100 3500).. Not sure about dividend yield calculation.. dps/mv of share… cum div share price or ex div share?.. not sure i used ex..thats all i remember.. if i at least get the calculations rite then i mite get 50..i also got the same results
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 7
- ☆
ohhhhh allah plz help me passed this paper andp2 and p3by the way
when i saw the paper,i thought examiner wants us to get pass ………..but when i started writing….i felt completely at loss
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
the posibility for negative cash flow at the end of period 2 is 20 %, it only happen when cash flow in period 2 is -9000, hence its posibility is 20%
I just remember part iii in a of question 1- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- ☆
The paper took me completely by surprise but am sure glad to see i’m not amongst few who think they’ll fail 😛
But i’m optimistic. Time to partyyyy 😀- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- ☆
It Was Well except Q1. Q1 was too strange and non a q was in KAPLAN BPP Kits of this type.
It was challanging I Hope for 50.Hi everyone,a friend has found a link on the ACCA website which offers an examination feedback form on specific papers. If you feel that the paper was unjust and the examiners language unnecessarily complicated please complete the form. The examination board use these feedback forms when setting marking schemes, before exam results are published. it could result in a few extra marks if the board agrees – so definitely worthwhile.
The link is noted below:
https://www.accaglobal.com/allnews/students/2010/NEWSQ2/News/3331775i think ACCA is gradually becoming some thing else. paper format changed completely as compared to previous ones.
if i have above 50% i think offering a mass will be the best option. examiners please have a rethink on what you have done this sesioni think ACCA is gradually becoming some thing else. paper format changed completely as compared to previous ones.
if i have above 50% i think offering a mass will be the best option. examiners please have a rethink on what you have done this sesion- Topics: 0
- Replies: 8
- ☆
@rafa2302 said:
Hi everyone,a friend has found a link on the ACCA website which offers an examination feedback form on specific papers. If you feel that the paper was unjust and the examiners language unnecessarily complicated please complete the form. The examination board use these feedback forms when setting marking schemes, before exam results are published. it could result in a few extra marks if the board agrees – so definitely worthwhile.
The link is noted below:
https://www.accaglobal.com/allnews/students/2010/NEWSQ2/News/3331775Hey Thanks for the link.. i will do it
I was completely panic after reading the paper, which result in disaster for me in Q2 where i forgot WACC.
@rmacconnachie said:
Does anyone know the answer to the middle section of question 4?Can we complain about the exam to ACCA?
YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT, WHY SHOULD BE ALLOW THE EXAMINER TO TREAT US IN AN UNFAIR WAY???? LET’S ALL EMAIL TO ACCA AND COMPLAIN ABOUT F9 EXAM. IF THEY SEE MANY COMPLAINTS, THEY WILL HAVE TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THAT!!!!
@Antonio_Blaze said:
LoL @ complaining to acca about the exam! did the exam cover anything thats not in the syllabus? NO! So,relax,friend and start preparing for december re-write.im gona be doing a past exam paper every week til december.that shud at least get me a 50QUESTION 1 ON PROBABILITY ANALYSIS: IF YOU CHECK THE BPP TEXTBOOK, YOU WILL FIND 2 SHORT PARAGRAPHS ON THIS SUBJECT AND ONE VERY SIMPLE EXAMPLE, THAT’S IT!!!!! I DIDN’T STUDY F5, I DON’T KNOW WHAT’S IN THAT SYLLABUS, I WAS EXEMPTED. WAS I SUPPOSED TO READ EXAMINER’S MIND? AND SOMEHOW ASSUME THAT SOMETHING THAT IS JUST MENTIONED IN THE TEXTBOOK WILL BE EXAMINED EXTENSIVELY?????????????????/
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
hahahhaaha i jus hope the examiner dont die laughin after markin my script
i dnt have good experience with diss paper.i dnt know what examiner expect 4m us.it was worst paper ever. u r rite johnnyn123 i calculate all dat like it.but at the end of period 2 there were no negative balance but in part (iii) examiner askd the value of negative balance at da end of period 2.overall paper was rough n unexpected.jst question 2 n 3 was better of but alot of hell theory.
i think the xaminer is experiencing a diificult tym in his martial lyf and is daily beatn up by his wife n kids …kia chutyapay ka ppr bnaya tha bc dalla gandoo xaminerr…
it was my forth atmpt nd if i dnt pass this tym i will start a campaign against the examiner nd acca…
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 11
- ☆
what a surprise!
Here is some of my answers, please feel free to comment.
Q1, use the cash flow multiple the %, easy to get the results( I think it was a positive)
then use the 8000 combine with the outcome in question 2 which I had three results( I think 2 positive and the last one is -$4000000.Q2, cannot remeber the IRR now. the WACC I got was about 24%, and interest rate coverage is 3.6 times.
the alternative investment option is discounted bond, original shares, rights shares, and venture capital.Q3, Errors-
1, didnt take the inflation into account
2, sale and variable cost did not take the inflated rate
3, capitalised cost should include depreciation, developmt cost and finanicing cost
4, the fixed cost should be included also it’s recovered
5, –cannot remember nowthe npv is a positive I remember
Q4, I think is easy,
the capital gain and dividend an be easily calculated by using the formulae,
the dividend price in after apply the new policy up to 2010 should be $4, which g = 0
after 2010 g= what ever the rate in the question (cant remember now) –didnt get this one rightthe three definition is easy enough to explain.
- Topics: 22
- Replies: 11
- ☆
People, are you sure that we turn up on the right exam?:). Where were my risk, valuation models, working capital management, EOQ,WACC and so many other key areas..and I think that calculation of probablility should be for F5…I dont have any idea should I hope for passing or nor…:)
Anyway.. the summer is coming, let enjoy it…Hi everyone, do all of you include development cost in CF of investment apraisal?
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
I hope I get 50 % & Pass…
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 11
- ☆
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
gud johnnyn 1st yr balance is 2100(+) and 2nd is 3900(+).
3rd part ans z 20%.
- The topic ‘June 10 Exams POLL Paper F9 was Post your comments here’ is closed to new replies.