Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA FM Financial Management Forums › June 10 Exams POLL Paper F9 was Post your comments here
- This topic has 209 replies, 126 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- June 10, 2010 at 3:31 pm #63234
That probabilities bit of question 1 was rediculous! I think there was enough marks elsewhere in the question to pass it though. 2nd time out for me – hope I passed!
June 10, 2010 at 3:36 pm #63235me too… 20% and 18% π
June 10, 2010 at 3:37 pm #63236The Gearing question is this debt/debt + equity????
June 10, 2010 at 3:39 pm #63237AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- β
I also got 20% and 18% on question 1, and a high NPV around $2000 ( i can’t remember exactly!) for q2
i left out the interest and the sunk fixed costs in q3 and used the nominal WACC – real rate x inflation rate rather than the 10%
I can’t remember what I ended up with on q4 for the DVM it seems at bit of a blur now!!June 10, 2010 at 3:41 pm #63238No the gearing would be debt/equity. The yardstick figures that were given clearly said that it was based on a debt/equity basis so therefore you need to compare apples to apples.
June 10, 2010 at 3:41 pm #63239AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- β
THANKS OPEN TUTION FOR THE LINK TO INTELLIGENCE ACCOUNTANCY LTD NOTES. THEY REALLY HELPED ME WITH THE THEORY PARTS. I HOPE FOR A 50%
June 10, 2010 at 3:42 pm #63240I also used the fisher effect to get the nominal discount rate. I think I messed up on the Tax allowances though (I always forget about the salvage value)
June 10, 2010 at 3:44 pm #63241AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 8
- β
I got cost of debt.. around 7%.. WACC >11.. Npv i remember was +2226 i think..
a{i} 2100 a{ii} 3900 (not sure 3100 3500).. Not sure about dividend yield calculation.. dps/mv of share… cum div share price or ex div share?.. not sure i used ex..thats all i remember.. if i at least get the calculations rite then i mite get 50..June 10, 2010 at 3:48 pm #63242AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- β
I think you deduct the scrap value from the balancing allowance in the final year before x by 30% to get the tax saving
I also used the fisher effect to get the nominal discount rate. I think I messed up on the Tax allowances though (I always forget about the salvage value)
June 10, 2010 at 3:56 pm #63243AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 11
- β
I got a really high NPV too, but I expected this considering we were taking out 200pa. I thought this was about right given the amount of mistakes that Trainee made. It actually made me feel good about NPV for once!!
In terms of the probability I just X each amount by the % and used the combined total as my CF. I hope this was right. It is just a simulation so is just for guidance. Fingers crossed!! A lot of theory but not a bad paper. Only got about 82% of it done, but we shall see!!
June 10, 2010 at 4:01 pm #63244June 10, 2010 at 4:07 pm #63246Thats all i did for the probabilities i x each one by the % added them together and used this as my inflow with a starting balance of 500 odrawn.
In terms of NPV i got rather high but not to high i think it was about $1.9 mill npv which i was worried about but it seems like allot of people got the same! Its a shame they dont mark on average like they used to on AAT because by the sound of it everyone has struggled!
I missed out a part of a question also because time wise its just a joke i dont know anyone who has ever finished it with time to spare!
Im really worried but there is nothing we can do now! Just enjoy summer and wait for august@raglem30 said:
I got a really high NPV too, but I expected this considering we were taking out 200pa. I thought this was about right given the amount of mistakes that Trainee made. It actually made me feel good about NPV for once!!In terms of the probability I just X each amount by the % and used the combined total as my CF. I hope this was right. It is just a simulation so is just for guidance. Fingers crossed!! A lot of theory but not a bad paper. Only got about 82% of it done, but we shall see!!
June 10, 2010 at 4:07 pm #63247AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 9
- β
q1 and 4 were unusual hadn’t seen like them before I’v been practicing for the last month I don’t think it’s fair to have two ambiguous questions on the same paper
June 10, 2010 at 4:07 pm #63248last exam 4 me…now time for some sleep… π
Good luck to those that still have exams left.
June 10, 2010 at 4:09 pm #63249AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 5
- β
Different exam.. 2nd attempt.. wasted.. Q1 part a sucks… and Q4 huh!! i hope to get 50 marks.. but not sure π
June 10, 2010 at 4:09 pm #63250AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 9
- β
@johnnyn123 said:
1st of all….the question didn’t ask for the expected cash flow at the end of each period but the ending balance, therefore the (500) had to be the opening balance for period 1 and the EV of cash flows at the end of period 1 had to be brought to period 2. can’t remember exactly what closing bal was for period 1 but was something like 2100 positive.I think we got the same answer
June 10, 2010 at 4:11 pm #63251AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 8
- β
i hope you guys pass.. Fingers crossed examiner shows some leniency!
June 10, 2010 at 4:31 pm #63252AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 22
- β
June 10, 2010 at 4:34 pm #63253Strange paper… nothing about working capital apart from some theory, no Forex, no interest rate risk. I hope I have passed becasuse I studied theory very well so hope to get at least 50. Good luck to everyone and thanks to OT and you all during these months!
amarain
June 10, 2010 at 4:35 pm #63254wat a hell paper it was i practiced a lot bt all in vain
June 10, 2010 at 4:46 pm #63255shear wast of time and money
June 10, 2010 at 5:11 pm #63256AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 8
- β
I totally SCREWED de paper or should i say de paper itself waz made dat way ….
Expected value… =X WTH
Theory part waz pretty decent though .. HUH !!
Let it go better luck nxt tym HEHEHE :))
June 10, 2010 at 5:25 pm #63257AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 10
- β
paper was too dificult,
June 10, 2010 at 5:29 pm #63258AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- β
i tried so hard but all the hardwork was in vain!!! the only proper question was for NPV, apart from that the whole paper was a mess…. i shouldnt have taken F9 this time…..
June 10, 2010 at 5:49 pm #63259AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- β
OMG. It’s the first time i’ve taken F9 and at the new exam format and i’ve just remembered, i forgot to mark the front page of the question attempted!!! Do you think it matters so much? I’m so scared i won’t get marked now… oh, i could cry.. π
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘June 10 Exams POLL Paper F9 was Post your comments here’ is closed to new replies.