June 10 Exams POLL Paper F4 was Post your comments here

well in f4 no one can say anything 😀
because last tme also d candidates were very happy about the exam dat came easy
but when it was result time dere smila blew off…
hope for d best dude 🙂
may god help us

the credit goes to opentuition, i studied only one month before the exam from the online lectures available on opentuition and i am hoping to get 90% lets see

hi, it was the first time that i have appeard in f4(ENG). i have attemptd all Questons except TORT .i really didnt know any case law so i wrote examples in all Questons.in last three Questons i just wrote the answer of 10 lines stating that who is liable n up 2 how extent. . like in 10th Questn i said that harry was breach of duty to diclose any interest of transaction. i ddnt write the whole powers of directors. is it ok? i mean can i able to pass paper in this scene? or is it diffcult? please guyz do reply. i am very tense.

@polo5678 said:
This is quite serious, i would contact the acca immediately and inform them as they made need to do a special procedure. Answers are scanned so it is vital they were in black. Sorry.

not serious at all! says do front page in black as this is computer read, answers should be written in blue or black,

I was a nervous wreck but a couple of things.
1. How much can a man write per question in 18 minutes???? and all parts of the one question. I have not written so much and I was feeling “ooh I should have mentioned this but look at the time….moving on..” My word it was alot to write that my hand hurt.
2. The scenarios questions 8 & 10 were indeed tricky. Hoping for a miracle there but overall I believe it was handled good.
DON’T PROVE ME WRONG ACCA!!!

tell me what how should we solve the last three Questons. i mean some people say that only write what is asks from you . like if it requires you to tell that whether the partner was liable for his THAT ACT or not?? so should we write WHOLE liabilties of partner or just write that yes he was liable for that act becz that act was the breach of a PARTICULAR DUTY.. DO reply on that should we write whole damn topic in the answer of just write what he askd.

Thankyou Open Tuition:-) You people are a good help:-)
look forward to study more from you:-)

The paper was good:-)

Ooops. I spoke about promissory estoppel in question 8! I basically argued that PE applied because she had gone back on her promise to pay. However because PE is a shield not a sword, neither had a case, but the 2nd guy had more of a case because she wasn’t offering it to him under duress.

I was able to solve first seven question but 8,9,10 were hard n confusing….don’t think will be pass by solving 7 question and touching 9,10.

for MYS F4, the last question was on Capital Maintenance and Dividend Law. some parts of the question were beyond syllabus (?) examiner asked “can holding company utilise subsidiary co’s profit to distribute dividend?” “if in the next year holding co makes profit, can holding co. distribute dividend without writing off previous loss?” “can holding co. distribute dividend using share premium?”

i could not find answers for these questions in BPP textbook. juz hope the marker can understand my arguments and give me some marks

i forgot to mark the questions attempted on the front page of answerbook lit!! : (
Now what will happen?????