Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA SBR Strategic Business Reporting Forums › June 10 Exams – Paper P2 was … Post your comments here
- This topic has 106 replies, 72 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- June 16, 2010 at 4:30 pm #64387AnonymousInactive
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 3
- ☆
@saira3007 said:
In case anyone wants to email a letter of complaint to BPP for the rubbish revision notes and practice and revision kit that didn’t go over the scenarios and topics that came up in the exam (can’t decide if it’s BPP’s or Holt’s fault) their email address is:Hopefully they can get their act together before it comes to resits!! Out of interest – did anyone who studied with Kaplan find the exam any better than the BPP students?
thanks..i will definitely putting my feedback in!!!hopefully with all the negative feedbacks they received,the passing rate can be pulled down..then evrybody will be happy but seems impossible though..haha~~just trying to console myself now..overall, the paper was sucks for me..
June 16, 2010 at 5:06 pm #64388AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
@faithleona said:
the key to passing P1 is to master the IAS in and out and remember that every aspect of the kit is important. I believe the paper ws a rather fair paper.So the key is to know all the IAS and every aspect of the kit inside out. Thanks for the tip!!!!
Even if I had spent the last 6 months learning and doing nothing but P2 I’m still not convinced it would be a done deal to pass this exam. There isn’t enough time in the exam to do Q1 with the care needed to avoid errors and go back over your work – even if you know how to do all the computations!
June 16, 2010 at 6:17 pm #64389AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 22
- ☆
@broonsta said:
So the key is to know all the IAS and every aspect of the kit inside out. Thanks for the tip!!!!
Even if I had spent the last 6 months learning and doing nothing but P2 I’m still not convinced it would be a done deal to pass this exam. There isn’t enough time in the exam to do Q1 with the care needed to avoid errors and go back over your work – even if you know how to do all the computations!I so agree with you! I spent so long on the first question that I just ended up rushing through the rest. And it’s not because it wasn’t doable. I even forgot to proportion out the Ceram co for the 6 mnths it was a subsidiary! I wouldn’t have forgotten if I hadn’t been so time-pressed. Just too many things to remember!
btw those of you who weren’t expecting Income Statement… didn’t you read ANY tips? Kaplan, BPP and even the tips on this site said to expect SOCI…
June 16, 2010 at 11:12 pm #64390AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- ☆
Q1 was different as there was the partial disposal of a sub subsidiary….adjustmennts were more or less straight forward…as for the purchasing of the bond….i guess it was a financial asset as opposed to a financial liability..
i did not interpret Q2 to be about SMEs…
i too hope i get 50%June 16, 2010 at 11:46 pm #64391Hi, it was not good at all, too much was asked on very insignificant parts of IFRS..like managemnt of earnings. I can see how figuring out that Q2 was about SME is going to make me a better accountant. Why didn’t he just come out and say so up front!
I think that i knew too much and did not get the oppertunity to prove it….I feel cheated!June 17, 2010 at 8:48 am #64392It was totally totally a disaster 🙁
Q1 is vertical group with disposal sub( Associate & still a sub). but it is required to the CSOCI which I have no idea about it but I am quite familar with the CSOFP.
Q3 is hedging accounting
Q4 is leasing which i was expecting for SMEs.how could this time to be so “Hard”? and bad wording?felt hopless………
June 17, 2010 at 9:09 am #64393AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 6
- ☆
Management of earnings question. The second point I blabbed on about change in accounting policy using IAS 8. The company were adjusting the way they were going to account for loss making financial instruments. They would be changing policy and therefore would need to disclose this in the financial staments. Therefore, it would only be unethical if they did not disclose their attempts to ‘smooth’ their earnings. Did anybody else look at from this angle? Of course the process of smoothing is also unethical too!
June 17, 2010 at 11:21 am #64394AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 12
- ☆
No matter how hard a paper is, it is about exam technique. I did section B before section A. Allocated 1.8 minutes for every mark and made sure I did each question in the allocated time. I then went to Section A and did question 1 b first and left the part a (IS) for the last hour. Did not stress too much because I had at least covered 65% of the paper. I totally ignored the adjustment for financial instrument completely due to time pressure and thought it was only worth 3-5 marks. Made sure I did the PAT & OCI attributable to NCI AND Parent to gain a few marks. The best way to be on top of the game is to have the exam technique right…These examiners know how to fool us and thats why they put lengthy questions in Section A so you can spend loads of time on it and before you know it you are marked out of 50 marks only because of the time pressure. Thought I should share what I know and sorry if it is a bit obvious to some of you but lets hope it will help others.
Best wishes everyone!
June 18, 2010 at 9:07 am #64397AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- ☆
management earning is creative accounting.To me this p2 had much to do with straying outside out conversional reading materials?? But, the challenge is to what extent and path one should persue! The paper was a teaser.
Wishing you the best!!!
June 18, 2010 at 9:28 am #64398AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 8
- ☆
man q1 was horrible while q2 q3 was ok.so only q2 q3 could save me…………..
June 18, 2010 at 1:41 pm #64399AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
Where did Clare’s message and my reply go?
June 18, 2010 at 6:51 pm #64400I guess paper wasnt dat bad
it was very bad but I manage to do gud 4 passing I guess pray 4 me
but datz sure pass rate will be reducng substantially frm 58% to into 30zzzzzz diz tym
June 18, 2010 at 8:01 pm #64401AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
does anyone knows when the results will be given?
June 18, 2010 at 8:47 pm #64402AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 22
- ☆
Someone sent me this article today. It was published in May 2010. Yes, one month before the exam. In any case I wish I had seen it before the exam, it might have helped me with Q4! Guess we can’t only depend on Student Accountant…
https://www.accaglobal.com/members/publications/accounting_business/CPD/leasefuture
btw Exam results are out on Monday 23 August 2010
June 22, 2010 at 4:50 am #64403After reading all the comments, I really think this paper is a disaster for me.
However, it was a fair paper for those well-prepared candidates. Anyway, if I can pass then it is a miracle. I am prepared to re-sit again this coming December 2010, hopefully, I am more well prepared by then because I don’t really understand how to calculate financial instruments and leases.
June 22, 2010 at 11:11 am #64404AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
I can not really remember but I answered q1,2 and 3. Of course there is nothing about “management of earning” in study materials maybe in ACCA Archives.
June 22, 2010 at 11:19 am #64405AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 12
- ☆
Management of earning is part of creative accounting. I think the paper was fair for a well prepared student. I have learnt to never rely on tips no matter what, you are safe understanding everything in the syllabus to a certain level for passing.
June 24, 2010 at 1:20 pm #64406I thought that exam was quite difficult. Qnt 1 was very poorly worded and it took me quite a lot of time to disect the information given in additional info. Regarding the Management of Earnings qnt, I dont even know where to start. It looks like it took everyone by surprise including myself.
Can I request everyone to provide their feedback (on the ACCA website) on the P2 exam, and you never know it may work in our favour.
goodluck everyone for your results.
Thanks
Mush
June 24, 2010 at 7:11 pm #64407AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
P2 Question Paper June 2010
For those masochists who want to see the paper again click link above!June 29, 2010 at 8:21 am #64408AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 5
- ☆
fyi…the graph on this page [url=https://https://opentuition.com/articles/polls/june-2010-acca-exams-instant-polls/?utm_source=OT+Members&utm_campaign=b549272753-29_June_Newsletter_2010&utm_medium=email]Opentuition P2 June 2010 Exam Poll result[/url]
is wrong for P2, it suggests that 35% voted for “it was ok”. However, they voted for “hope for 50%”….the picture would then look much worse…
My only hope is that the examiner reduces his expectation and threshold for a pass when marking our exams….
June 29, 2010 at 8:23 am #64409AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 5
- ☆
sorry, bad link:
June 29, 2010 at 12:49 pm #64410AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
Epic Fail for me. I was very disappointed when I saw the paper. I was fairly confident going into the exam as I had a good knowledge of all the material and especially the past exam papers. I think the approach in asking the question are ridiculous because in real life situations its completely different. I know I know the material, but when the questions are fucked up the way they have been asked as they have been here its a disgrace. Its a bloody accountancy exam, I would need a PHD in translating poxy english to pass this paper. Why not get to the point when asking questions using accounting english??????
June 29, 2010 at 6:18 pm #64411AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
I am on the brink of giving up. The exam was a disappointment. The time allotted was too short and I still do not understand some of the questions. I pray to score at least 50%.
June 30, 2010 at 1:02 pm #64412Hi,
I did not like the exam but kept going. I did Q1,Q2 and Q4. The SOCI was expected but I thought the examiner could still come up with a Cashflow statement, well that’s what I would have preferred. I did something for all the adjustments. Has anyone found the holiday days bit covered in any of the texts?
I like everyone else did not know what earnings management was but went down the route of window dressing and reliablilty and comparability, so hope for a few marks there. I have not found earnings management mentioned in any of the texts but it is in Claref’s book.
Q2 surprised there were no real figures to discuss, just hope again I get some marks.
Q4 my weakest I think, did what I could.
I kept going and answered 3 questions so could do no more, still don’t feel it will be enough, just have to wait and see.
I read somewhere else people were ringing one of the national offices to complain about the paper and being told to put their complaint in writing as it may make a difference to the marking.
June 30, 2010 at 1:56 pm #64413AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
The paper was just too terrible, they should stop issuing articles when approaching exams coz we are used to thinking that those are the likely topics to come up in the exam, but p2 was something else, does the examiner want us to qualify or what?
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.