• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

its is from Daron dec 95

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › its is from Daron dec 95

  • This topic has 9 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 11, 2014 at 8:21 am #168290
    ASHOK
    Member
    • Topics: 64
    • Replies: 103
    • ☆☆

    iam using kaplan revision kit in its answer Report for managers of Daron
    offer to purchase the company
    it has written An offer of $20million is an 8.7% premium over the current share price ( which is quite low
    it has also calculated expected present value is $30.3million

    I want to know how this 8.7% premium had came

    and also want to know that why it has not use the formula in calculating free cash flow after year 20X9 -Y3 as FCF (1+g)/WACC-g

    May 11, 2014 at 12:12 pm #168320
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The current share price is $0.92. There are 20M shares, so the total market value is $18.4M.

    So the premium is 20 – 18.4 = 1.6M. As a percentage this is 1.6/18.4 = 8.7%

    The formula (which is effectively the same as the dividend growth formula) is only relevant for flows in perpetuity. Here we need to discount for just the extra years and so the formula is not relevant.

    May 28, 2015 at 2:03 am #249724
    hanhvn
    Member
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 50
    • ☆☆

    Dear Mr Moffat

    In this question, when considering the sale recommendation, the answer compares the estimated value of the existing operation using FCF (WACC to discount) with an un-offcial offer to see if it is worth the sale.

    I think the estimated NPV (FCF discounted at WACC) is the value of the firm, thus it will the deduct the debt value to get the equity value. This equity value will then compare with the offer. However, the answer did not deduct the debt value. I must be wrong somewhere. Can you please explain on this?

    Thanks

    Hanhvn

    May 28, 2015 at 9:20 am #249771
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    It is assuming that if the business is sold then the acquirer would take over all of the assets and liabilities (including the debt). (If the debt had to be paid off before the sale, then you would have been correct, but this is unlikely)

    May 28, 2015 at 9:44 am #249784
    hanhvn
    Member
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 50
    • ☆☆

    Dear Mr Moffat,

    Even if the question states that “An informal, unpublicised, offer of 10mil for the company’s SHARES…” we should also assume that it is the Firm’s value, rather than the Equity’s value, that is to transfer?

    Many thanks,
    Hanhvn

    May 28, 2015 at 9:56 am #249786
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes! Suppose you own all the shares in a company. Then if someone takes over the company it is you that they will pay, but you would expect them to take over all of the assets and all of the liabilities of the business (unless there was some agreement that you would pay off liabilities before they took it over, which would be unusual).

    May 28, 2015 at 10:23 am #249794
    hanhvn
    Member
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 50
    • ☆☆

    Dear Mr Moffat,

    So if the question asked to estimate the value of the share then we would have had to deduct the debt from the firm’s value similar to question Nente in June2012 ?

    Thanks a lot.

    Hanh

    May 28, 2015 at 1:56 pm #249840
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes. I know it seems similar, but there is a difference. They are proposing to buy the equity and a proportion of the debt. They have valued the equity but the final overall cost will depend on how much of the debt they take over.

    May 28, 2015 at 4:25 pm #249911
    hanhvn
    Member
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 50
    • ☆☆

    Thank you very much, Mr Moffat.

    May 28, 2015 at 8:11 pm #249987
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Venoth on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • mrjonbain on Professionalism, ethical codes and the public interest – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • mrjonbain on Professionalism, ethical codes and the public interest – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • kemo1000 on Financial instruments – convertible debentures – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • barbjohn on Equity Law, Ratio Decidendi – ACCA LW Global

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in