Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA AA Audit and Assurance Forums › Is lowballing allowed?
- This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by techno.
- AuthorPosts
- April 12, 2010 at 3:39 pm #43490
Hi,
Wonder if anyone can clarify something for me?In the BPP text it says that lowballing is a possible threat to independence, but recommends some safeguards if the lowballing tender is successful.
But later in the book it implies (in a practice question) that lowballing is not permitted.So I’m not sure…is lowballing permitted, provided you use safeguards, or is it totally not permitted?
Thanks.
April 12, 2010 at 9:11 pm #59071AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 16
- ☆
hi,
lowballing is a kind of controversial area in the hierarchy of threats to independence. U should understand the concept of independence firstly and then u have an answer on ur question:
1. Independence is a STATE OF MIND – u, as an auditor allways prefer fair busniness relationship with ur client.
2. Independence in APPERANCE – u shoudl no be only independent, u should also appear independent? what does it mean in case of lowballing?let me explain why is lawballing controversial area in first place: if audit firm charges fees far low then its competitor firms, then we have threat to independence, mostly of unacceptable level, in this case engagement should be terminated. But if audit firm will charge fees which are nearly the same as by competitors, it will possible loose valuable clients. So code of ethics says: if audit firm can justify (independence in APPERANCE) lower fees with suficient documentation and is reasonable taking in account current level of labour rate etc. then it is permitted to charge lower fees provided appropriate safeguards are in place. in this case it will not be deemed as lowballing by the profession.
That’s why u have two different statements in bpp text and revision kits.
hope now is clear.
rgrds
April 12, 2010 at 11:36 pm #59072Hi,
Thanks for your explanation. It’s really helpful.
So can I clarify…if fees are low, but can be justified as reasonable with labour costs, and backed up with sufficient documentation, then the argument is that it is not truly lowballing, and is therefore OK?
But if it is excessively low, and does not cover labour costs, then it is unacceptable (as too much of a threat to independence)?
Have I got that right?
Many thanks for your help.April 13, 2010 at 5:32 pm #59073AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 16
- ☆
u’ve got it exactly rt my friend, good job
April 17, 2010 at 6:58 am #59074Many thanks Baluacca…you’re a lifesaver!
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.