Can you please explain the flaw in my understanding of these examples.
I managed to follow the example in the lectures, but am struggling to understand why my general equation fails.
Following the examples, I am expecting to find a reliable relationship between the values used on the Statement of Financial Position and the Statement of Profit/Loss, such that I can use the available values on one statement to derive and check my calculated values for the other statement.
From Example 2, I supposed that:
Statement of Profit or Loss: Initial Receivables Value - Calculated Expenses
Should be Equal to:
Statement of Financial Position : Final receivables value - Calculated allowances
Is this assumption valid and correct?
So that, given two values from either statement, I could calculate the third value, and then perform a check between the two statements that my results are consistent.
Using Example 2:
Statement of Profit or Loss: Initial Receivables Value (from the question) - Calculated Expenses
Statement of Profit or Loss data: $82,000 - $20,560 = $61,440
Statement of Financial Position : Final receivables value - Calculated allowances
Statement of Profit or Loss data: $74,000 - $12,560 = $61,440
Using Example 3: The assertion above does not work, but I am struggling to see why:
Statement of Profit or Loss: Initial Receivables Value (from the question) - Calculated Expenses
Statement of Profit or Loss data: ($261,000 - $238,000) - $6,488 = $16,512
$23,000 - $6,488 = $16,512
Statement of Financial Position : Final receivables value - Calculated allowances
Statement of Financial position data: $87,200 - $9,248 = $77,952
Assuming the SOFP calculation and my initial assertion are correct:
Initial Receivables Value - Calculated Expenses = Final receivables value - Calculated allowances
Initial Receivables Value = Final calculated receivables value - Calculated allowances + Calculated Expenses
= $87,200 - $9,248 + $6,488
= $84,440
This value is not provided in the example, nor do I get it at any stage, as a value for the receivables.
Ask the Tutor ACCA FA
Irrecoverable Debts and Allowances Example 2 and 3
At the end of the second year, the net figure for receivables (before accounting for irrecoverable and doubtful debts at the end of the second year) would be 97,000 - 12,560 = 84,440.
After accounting for the irrecoverable and doubtful debts, the net receivables end up as 87,200 - 9,248 = 77,952
The difference is 6,488, and this is the total expense that appears in the SOPL for the year.
Thank you. That makes sense now. I've rewatched the lectures and can follow the methods better, alongside your explanation.
Great :-)
Topic lockedNew replies are closed.
