• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

BPP Black Friday sale!

40% discount on all BPP books specially for OpenTuition students!
Get it here >>

IRR

Forums › CIMA Forums › IRR

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by Cath.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 16, 2017 at 8:27 pm #367774
    abz12
    Member
    • Topics: 46
    • Replies: 44
    • ☆☆

    Hi Cath. i am really struggling with some of these decision making questions…. Am I missing something or is it just the nature of questions I am doing?

    Question.
    An education authority is considering the implementation of a CCTV system. details of the project are below:

    1. Life of project 5 years
    2. Initial cost 750,000
    Annual Savings:
    Labor cost- 20,000
    other costs- 5,000
    cost of capital 15% per annum

    Question. The percentage change in the annual labor cost savings that could occur before the project ceased viable is?

    January 16, 2017 at 11:22 pm #367809
    Cath
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 448
    • ☆☆☆

    Hi Abz

    I think some of your concern is exam panic! – I think you are doing great and working really hard from what Ive seen so far!!

    This is a standard sensitivity analysis problem meaning we’d use the formula:

    sensitivity % of project variable = NPV/ PV of project variable x 100

    It tells you by how much the variable – e.g. labour costs would need to change before the project was no longer viable.

    Only problem here is this project is not viable to start with – if the machine costs $750,000 – its not going to be worthwhile for 5 years of savings of just 25,000 per year – that doesnt begin to make up for the initial cost of 750,000 even before we discount. Therefore we would have a non-viable negative NPV in our sensitivity calc which is illogical.

    If your figures are definitely correct then it must be a mistake in the question – maybe an extra zero has been added or is missing from one of the cashflows?

    Kind Regards
    Cath

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Musumalip on Audit tests: the difference between tests of control and substantive tests
  • Javen on Property, plant and equipment (IAS 16) – Revaluation increase – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • BlakeR on Group SCF – Introduction – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • John Moffat on The cost of capital – Cost of debt – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • John Moffat on FM Chapter 9 Questions – Discounted cash flow – further aspects

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in