• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

INVESTMENT IN CONSLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › INVESTMENT IN CONSLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT

  • This topic has 6 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 6, 2016 at 8:42 am #354422
    syed arslan
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    Sir i have a Question

    We are making Consolidated Financial statement for business.

    The Owner Invested the Cash from Shop 1 to Shop 2, even amount is transfered into other Shop, but we are making Consolidated Statement of Both Shops

    Please tell me how to deal with this ???

    Regards

    December 6, 2016 at 9:04 am #354427
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23327
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    This is not clear from your question but it looks like a simple enough consolidation (assuming that both shops are limited entities)

    If they are simply corner shops, there are no consolidation implications

    If the owner personally invested in shop (entity) 2 by buying the shares in entity 2 and already personally holds the majority of the shares in shop (entity) 1, then again there are no consolidation implications

    IF shop (entity) 1 acquired the shares in shop (entity) 2, then we have a consolidation – but it’s just a normal consolidation exercise

    December 6, 2016 at 9:19 am #354428
    syed arslan
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    Sir, the owner has Already 100% ownership of Both the shop

    what he just did, he Took the “Cash in Hand” from Shop 1 , and added it into Shop 2.

    So the Capital of Shop 2 Increased Right?

    But we are using one Profit&loss and Balance Sheet for both of the Businesses,

    Now my Question is this, what will be the Entry if “Cash in Hand” is Reducing of “Shop 1” and “Capital” is increasing of “Shop 2”?

    December 6, 2016 at 11:05 am #354452
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23327
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The main issue here is … are these shops limited entities? When you say “shop” is it actually a shop or is it a company, and entity?

    Do they have a separate legal identity and do they have share capital

    Tell me that first and we can go from there

    December 6, 2016 at 11:47 am #354459
    syed arslan
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    yes sir, these shops are seperate legat entities and they have no share capital,

    Both of the shops are small businesses

    December 6, 2016 at 12:09 pm #354460
    syed arslan
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    its also limited entity,

    December 6, 2016 at 12:16 pm #354461
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23327
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    “these shops are seperate legat entities and they have no share capital”

    “also its not a limited company, the own is responsibe for its everything”

    These two statements are non-compatible

    How can they be separate legal entities if they are not companies, they have no share capital and the owner is responsible for everything?

    For a business / shop to be classed as a separate legal entity, it must be a company

    If your shops are not companies / entities then this is simply a matter of the owner taking cash from shop1 (drawings) and putting it into shop 2 (proprietor’s capital introduced)

    The owner should prepare financial statements for his / her own benefit (they will assist in better management of the separate businesses) and a combined set of financial statements (to support the profits that (s)he is reporting to the taxman)

    There are no consolidation implications that I can see from the information that you have given me

    This is more like an F3 exercise than F7

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • John Moffat on Relevant Cash Flows for DCF Relevant Costs (example 1) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • John Moffat on Accounting for Management – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Hsaini on Accounting for Management – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • kennedyavege@2023 on Relevant Cash Flows for DCF Relevant Costs (example 1) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • John Moffat on Relevant Cash Flows for DCF Relevant Costs (example 1) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in