• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

intangible asset

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › intangible asset

  • This topic has 7 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 30, 2015 at 12:31 am #286262
    sasha
    Member
    • Topics: 99
    • Replies: 141
    • ☆☆☆

    sir in recognition of expense , start up costs, training cost, advertising cost, business relocation cost are written of if intangible asset does not meet the criteria for recognition as an asset.

    but if our intangible assets meet the criteria for recognition and above all costs are incurred related to that intangible asset, then should we have to all of those above mentioned expenses capitalize,

    November 30, 2015 at 2:29 am #286275
    sasha
    Member
    • Topics: 99
    • Replies: 141
    • ☆☆☆

    during the year to 31 dec 2008 Co X incurred 200,000 of development costs for a new product, 60000 on 1st january 2008 on machinery specially used to help develop the new product and 40000 on building identity. commercial production is expected to start during 2009.

    at what value should intangible appear in SFP as at 31 dec 2008.?
    my solution:
    development cost to 31dec= 200000
    on 1st jan = 60000
    less: amortization (60000/4)= 15000

    so I got answer of 245000. in book, 15000 is added in 200000. but why sir?

    November 30, 2015 at 9:00 am #286329
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23303
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Because of the matching principle! Amortisation should commence only after you have income / revenue against which to match the expense

    Ok?

    December 2, 2015 at 1:21 am #286859
    sasha
    Member
    • Topics: 99
    • Replies: 141
    • ☆☆☆

    sir i did not get the point.. 🙁

    firstly,why the cost of january 60000 not added with 200000 ?

    ” Amortisation should commence only after you have income / revenue against which to match the expense”. but you have added amortization 15000 with 200000. why?

    December 2, 2015 at 8:41 am #286909
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23303
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Ok, the plant acquired for the project is not a cost of one year – it’s depreciated over the shorter of the plant’s useful file or the life of the project if there is no use for the plant aft the project is completed.

    Here the plant has apparently a four year useful life so only the depreciation each year is a relevant cost of the project

    Is that better?

    December 2, 2015 at 11:45 am #286953
    sasha
    Member
    • Topics: 99
    • Replies: 141
    • ☆☆☆

    ok i got it 🙂

    sir let’s say production start from below years

    1. 1st jan 2008 itself
    so here we need to record 200000 only?

    2. 1st jan 2010
    so here we have to record the amount 200000+30000.. right?

    3. if it says production didn’t begin at all 😀

    December 2, 2015 at 11:47 am #286954
    sasha
    Member
    • Topics: 99
    • Replies: 141
    • ☆☆☆

    sir can also tell me the amount that goes to P/L in all those 3 conditions.

    I guess no amount goes to P/l in 1st condition. not sure though 🙁

    December 2, 2015 at 12:25 pm #286966
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23303
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Over what period are you intending to amortise? If production starts in 2008 then one year amortisation for 2008

    If we have 200,000 in development as an asset at the start of 2010 and production starts on 1 January, 2010 then amortise for one year for 2010

    If production doesn’t start, then no amortisation

    If production NEVER starts, as soon as we realise that there is going to be no revenue generated, we should expense all the deferred development expenditure immediately

    Ok?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • hhys on PM Chapter 14 Questions More variance analysis
  • azubair on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • bizuayehuy on Interest rate risk management (1) Part 1 – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • sokleng on FM Chapter 7 Questions – Investment appraisal – methods
  • Annabelayinloya on IFRS 16 Identifying a lease – ACCA (SBR) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in