- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by
.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- Posts
Sir in the previous post you replied that “Because if he got an injunction that would have the effect of preventing them from earning a living and that is contrary to fairness”, But sir if injunction was granted then how would the group be prevented from earning? It was an injunction to restrain the group from engaging another manager.. It was not an injunction to restrain the group from carrying any business……….
In Warner Brothers Pictures Inc v Nelson (1936), injunction was granted in order to prevent Bette not to undertake any other film work.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- The topic ‘Injunction continued’ is closed to new replies.