Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA TX-UK Exams › IHT – Chargeable Lifetime Transfers
- This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by alaccountancy.
- AuthorPosts
- June 9, 2019 at 1:13 pm #519968
Hi Sir
If a donor makes a donation of, say, £300,000, 2 years prior to their death and their entire estate was worth £700,000 on death (including the £300,000 gifted two years prior to their death) would the £300,000 gifted, still be included in their death estate, even though they gifted it and it was awarded the first £300,000 of the £325,000 NRB?
i.e.
Would the chargeable lifetime gift attract £0 tax on the chargeable transfer and then, on the death estate:£25,000 @ NRB (remaining NRB of £25,000 after first £300,000 allocated to lifetime transfer) = £0 and then;
£675,000 @ 40% = £270,000A) So, ultimately then, even if you make a gift, and that lifetime transfer is exempt from IHT, the value of that gift is still included in your chargeable death estate, despite being gifted and awarded the NRB on the life time transfer?
B) Lastly, if the gift had been made in excess of seven years prior to the death, it would utilise none of the NRB on the lifetime transfer itself (i.e. the full £325k would be available to set against the death estate) AND whatever gift was made (in excess of 7 years prior to the death of the donor) would also be removed from the amount of the chargeable estate that is subject to IHT?
Thank you.
June 11, 2019 at 11:03 am #520192Have you worked through all the IHT lectures?? If you had you really should not be asking these questions.
The chargeable estate on death clearly does NOT include any lifetime transfers!June 16, 2019 at 10:30 am #520577Apologies, I hadn’t ticked the option for notification of a response and I’ve just seen this, by manually checking.
Thanks for your response.
I’d watched the two lectures, but didn’t want to proceed any further without clarifying this first. Further, I had re-watched the second lecture to try to figure out, where I was going wrong, because, intuitively, I sensed that I was misunderstanding something.
In the second lecture video for IHT, Illustration 4, Dee had gifted $200k from her estate (continuing from a previous example where she had gifted nothing) and so I’d interpreted this to mean, that she had gifted $200k, from the $750k estate and so I was expecting the death estate to have been reduced down to $550k (the $750k less the gift of $200k) and the residual NRB of $125k to be applied to the $550k – I didn’t appreciate that she had a $750k death estate after gifting $200k already. Hence my confusion, apologies, I can be prone to such interpretative errors, but I am really trying to work on it.June 19, 2019 at 9:15 pm #520882No problem – I now understand the reason for your question but hopefully you are now ok with your understanding of the issues.
June 20, 2019 at 7:13 pm #520958Thanks again sir – it’s all clear now.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.