• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for December 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

IHT

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA TX-UK Exams › IHT

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 hour ago by AmandaP.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 11, 2025 at 4:58 pm #723530
    alexapop
    Participant
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 0
    • ☆

    Hi, I am about to sit my Taxation exam in 3 weeks and I did some mock tests and I came across this question about IHT and ACCA only gives the correct answers, and they do not give the explanation as to why that is the correct answer or any debrief etc… can you please help me with this question because I really don’t know how they got that figure …

    According to my knowledge of what I studied so far, I calculated like this:

    Gross chargeable estate 950,000
    Less RNRB (resident Nil Rate Band) (175,000)
    Less NRB £325.00
    Less GCT’s from 7 prior years (220,000)
    Available NRB (£105,000)
    Taxable amount £670,000
    IHT @ death @40% £268,000

    The PET gift from 14 August 2015 is too old, more than 7 years before death so it does not become chargeable so I left that out… the PET from November 2024 becomes chargeable so I reduced the NRB @ death by that one but I still don’t get £338,000. I applied the RNRB because it says in the question that she leaves the whole estate to her children who are direct descendants so it should apply.

    Not sure how to get to their answer of £338,000….. any idea? The only way you would get this £338,000 figure was if I didn’t apply the RNRB…it would be £950,000 less the revised NRB of ££105,000 = £845,000 x 40% death IHT = £338,000. But why would they not apply the RNRB since the deceased leaves the estate to her children, who are direct descendants…. ?

    This is the question from the mock exam:

    “You should assume that today’s date is 15 March 2025.
    Opal is aged 71 and has a chargeable estate for inheritance tax (IHT) purposes valued at
    £950,000.
    She owns two properties respectively valued at £374,000 and £442,000. The first property has an
    outstanding repayment mortgage of £160,000, and the second property has an outstanding
    endowment mortgage of £92,000.
    Opal owes £22,400 in respect of a personal loan from a bank and she has also verbally promised
    to pay legal fees of £4,600 incurred by her nephew. Opal expects the cost of her funeral to be
    £5,200 and this cost will be covered by the £6,000 that she has invested in an individual savings
    account (ISA).
    Under the terms of her will, Opal has left all of her estate to her children. Opal’s husband is still
    alive.
    On 14 August 2015, Opal had made a gift of £100,000 to her daughter and on 7 November 2024,
    she made a gift of £220,000 to her son. Both these figures are after deducting all available
    exemptions.
    You should assume that both the value of Opal’s estate and the nil rate band will remain
    unchanged for future years.

    What amount of IHT will be payable in respect of Opal’s chargeable estate valued at
    £950,000 were she to die on 20 March 2025?
    £250,000
    £338,000
    £378,000
    £335,600”

    November 11, 2025 at 8:19 pm #723532
    AmandaP
    Moderator
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 37
    • ☆

    The question states that she owns two properties, but it does not state that either of them were her main residence (they could both be rental properties). On the assumption that neither of her properties were he main residence, then the RNRB would not apply as that is one of the conditions. I must admit that the question is a bit vague on the point though!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • dalo on Joint arrangements – Introduction – ACCA Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) lectures
  • poloko on Investment Appraisal – NPV, IRR – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Victory-mine on Cost Classification and Behaviour (part 1) – CIMA P1
  • AliMalik on Chapter 6 Tax Adjusted Trading Losses – Individuals TX-UK FA2023
  • John Moffat on Discounted Cash Flow – Internal Rate of Return – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in