• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Ias28

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Ias28

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 26, 2013 at 2:56 pm #139089
    marilynlojikim
    Member
    • Topics: 15
    • Replies: 32
    • ☆

    Hello sir,

    I am looking at coursenotes page 68. Example 2.

    Just want to know why we dont have to adjust the dividend proposed in both investor n investees RE?

    If investee declaring dividend. Wont investor be getting dividend income as per shareholding?

    Ahhhhh… Is it because it has not been declared… Just proposed? So its different if it were a subsidiary???

    I sound sooooo desperately lost!!! Pls help me

    August 26, 2013 at 7:25 pm #139111
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23315
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Hi, no, where the question says that the companies have declared dividends before the year end, both investee and investor should be accounting for it (20,000 payable in the subsidiary and 60% x 20,000 = 12,000 receivable in the subsidiary)

    In the subsidiary, the 20,000 will be deducted from Natalija’s retained earnings but this will be shown in Natalija’s Statement of Changes in Equity.

    As for the 12,000 receivable – yes, Viktorija should have accounted for this in her Statement of Income as “Investment income” and when it comes to trying to “prove” the consolidated retained earnings (not expected of you in F7) then when doing Working 3 you would have to include this 12,000.

    But for the Consolidated Statement of Income we ignore the dividend received from the subsidiary ie we do not include it within the Consolidated statements.

    Is that ok, or do you need more?

    If so, post again

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • manahylilyas on The financial management environment – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • poojam on Objective of financial reporting – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • mm3677 on IAS 16 Accounting for a revaluation – CIMA F1 Financial Reporting
  • Anastesia123 on MA Chapter 1 Questions Accounting for Management
  • John Moffat on MA Chapter 26 Questions Variance Analysis

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in