• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exam Results

Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

IAS 8 Errors

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › IAS 8 Errors

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 26, 2016 at 5:01 pm #302222
    krist321
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 0
    • ☆

    Hello,

    I am sure you know this problem very well.

    During 20X7 Global discovered that certain items had been included in inventory at 31 December 20X6, valued at $4.2 million, which had been in fact sold before the year end.

    20X6 20×7(Draft)
    (millions) (millions)
    sales 47400 67200
    cost of goods sold (34,570) (55800)
    profit before tax 12830 11400
    income taxes (3,880) (3400)
    profit for the period 8950 8000

    Retained earnings at 1 January 20X7 were $13 million. The cost of goods sold for 20X7 includes the $4.2 million error in opening inventory. The income tax rate was 30% for 20X6 and 20X7.

    Required : Show the income statement for 20X7, with 20X6 comparative.

    My question is the following:

    I do not understand why the income tax is deducted in 2006 from 3880 and why added in 2007 to 3400. Isn’t it that when we sell sth and have a revenue, we have an increase in the income tax because the received revenue is taxed? If yes, then why would we deduct 1260 from 3880 but not add? The same for 2007.
    Thanks in advance.

    February 27, 2016 at 10:10 pm #302374
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23327
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Should not the 2006 cost of sales been increased by the $4,200 thus reducing 2006 profits and 2006 tax by 30% x $4,200 = $1,260?

    And a corresponding decrease in 2007 cost of sales, a resultant increase in 2007 profits and a resultant increase in 2007 tax by $1,260?

    Does that answer you?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • John Moffat on FA Chapter 6 Questions Depreciation
  • Masterodad on FA Chapter 6 Questions Depreciation
  • natashad25 on MA Chapter 3 Questions Presenting Information
  • Rachaelosa on PPE – Financial Statements and PPE – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Sarah461422 on Audit Evidence – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in