• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

IAS 16 – PPE – from revaluation model to cost model

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › IAS 16 – PPE – from revaluation model to cost model

  • This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 8, 2013 at 3:05 pm #130713
    knylam
    Member
    • Topics: 20
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆

    Dear Tutor,
    Following an increase in the value of the PPE, as per revaluation model, the entity now decides to switch back to the Cost model, how should we account for this?
    Normally, due to this, we will have to derecognise the remaining amount in the Rev. reserve (both OCI + OCE), right?

    Does it apply to all other IAS? like for intangibles too.
    Thank you in advance.

    June 8, 2013 at 3:41 pm #130719
    nevyana
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 48
    • ☆☆

    Is this applied retrospectively as accounting policy change?

    June 8, 2013 at 4:28 pm #130730
    knylam
    Member
    • Topics: 20
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆

    No, it is applied after, so i was thinking, maybe we should derecognise the amount in the Revaluation reserve, not really sure though.

    June 9, 2013 at 1:31 pm #130879
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23309
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I answered this last evening! Where’s it gone? Here we go again 🙁

    I’m not even sure that we can chop and change like this. From cost model to fair value model and back to cost? That’s surely a change in accounting policy and it’s not as a result of compliance with law nor with a new standard. So the only acceptable justification would be to make the financial statements more reliable and no less relevant or more relevant and no less reliable.

    And to keep switching like you suggest would be a tricky one to get past the auditors

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • nosiphoceliwedlamini@gmail.com on Financial instruments – convertible debentures – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • NirajNathani99 on PPE – revaluation upwards – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • AKN1989 on Linear Programming – Maximum contribution – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • Motsotase910 on Contingent Assets and Liabilities – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • Kim Smith on ACCA F2 Key to success

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in