• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

I need explanation (Bond Yield calc) pre-Dec 23 mock

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA AFM Advanced Financial Management Forums › I need explanation (Bond Yield calc) pre-Dec 23 mock

  • This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by Brookes97.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 2, 2023 at 11:34 am #695862
    MohamedH
    Participant
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 14
    • ☆

    Guys, anyone can explain this
    Minute 31 of the video, why they have calculated the yield over 5 years not 4 years?!!!!!!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwFG-7ApOY8&t=211s

    December 4, 2023 at 10:32 am #695980
    Brookes97
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    Also interested in the reasoning behind this. It seems a bit ridiculous that they release pre-exam mocks without mark schemes. Appreciate they have expert tutors going through it, but usually at break-neck speeds and without much explanation as to why they’re doing things other than “because it’s correct”.

    MV of the bond is calculated across 4 years without the tax-shield on interest payments.
    YTM is calculated with the tax-shield on interest payments because it’s a Kd calculation.
    YTM is the discount rate where the present value is equal to the MV. (Essentially IRR).

    Not a clue why they’ve slapped an additional year onto the four-year redeemable bonds.

    December 5, 2023 at 9:12 pm #696188
    tovey1996
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    This question is very identical to Kingtim in the Kaplan Revison Kit.

    Not sure why that lecturer has done five years as its four years in the mark scheme.

    Hope this helps

    December 6, 2023 at 3:24 pm #696229
    Brookes97
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    Thanks Tovey, that’s super helpful that there’s an identical question in the Exam Kit.

    IRR Function of the following:
    T1: -109.92
    T2: 5.63
    T3: 5.63
    T4: 113.63

    Does get the 4.7% in the mark scheme. Very reassuring to have cleared this up before the exam!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Nicholas1239798 on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Starmoon123 on Strategy formulation (Part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • nosiphoceliwedlamini@gmail.com on Revenue – Example 5 (profitable contracts) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • amaanalli on Fraud, bribery, whistle-blowing and company ethics – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • verweijlisa on Group SPL – Group profit on disposal – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in