Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FM Exams › (i) maximising the wealth of its shareholders and (ii) achieving continuous grow
- This topic has 5 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by John Moffat.
- AuthorPosts
- March 24, 2013 at 10:02 am #120509
Sir,
Can you please help me to understand the above topics from the Question no #4(a).Past Paper (June,2009)?March 25, 2013 at 7:31 am #120538Have you read the examiners answer, because it is hard to add much to what he has written!
The wealth of shareholders is measured mainly by the share price and by the dividends they have received.
The question asks about continuous growth in the earning per share, which means exactly what is says – has the earnings per share been growing each year or not.
May 18, 2013 at 12:45 am #125853AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- ☆
Good Day Admin
Are u here to help us? If we have tried a question and did read the examiners answer and still don’t understand then we, the student believe we can turn to you for further clarification.
However,
I have read the answer you have given to the above question and it still does not help me to understand.
I do apologize if i sound a bit harsh, but i have read some of the answers you have given to questions asked, and it sounds very insulting to the students.
After all we are students who are still in the learning process.May 19, 2013 at 9:14 am #126036My answer was not the slightest bit insulting.
I am more than happy to give further clarification if you say which part of the answer causes a problem – there is not much point in me rewriting the whole answer!
Maximising the wealth of shareholders and achieving continuous growth in EPS are not specific topics.
The question said that these were the objectives for the company and asked you to calculate if they had been achieved.My answer to the post explained what was meant by shareholder wealth, and by continuous growth in EPS.
However, as I wrote, it is difficult to add anything to the examiners answer – his answer was very good.
There is not much point in rewriting the entire answer on here!Since you have posted under this heading, then obviously you had a problem with some part of the answer. If you post which part of his answer was causing the problem for you then I will obviously explain.
May 19, 2013 at 10:14 am #126054Hi John
In the exam what is the best approach to questions like this?
I tried this yesterday and was unsure of where to start, however as industry averages where given I calculated the ratios for these for JJG for the three years and compared. Clearly I am never going to give the text book answer, Is it necessary to do all the calculations given in the examiners answer?
There are 7 marks given for calculations – how many calculations are expected, my concern is that I would spend the full 20mins on calculations if I were to do this the same way as the model answer.
Much appreciated.
May 19, 2013 at 5:11 pm #126112In an ideal world you would have done all the calculations, but that is not possible in the time and would not be expected.
The first thing to do is address the two objectives. Calculating the EPS is very quick, and you do not even need to calculate the growth percentages because it is clear from the numbers that there is continuous growth.
Calculating the return to shareholders takes a bit longer but should be OK – if you are not clear about the arithmetic in the answer then ask again.
If that was all you had done then you would have got about 6 marks out of 12 (and your object always is to be getting 50% of each part as fast as possible – whatever extra marks you then get are a ‘bonus’ 🙂 )Whatever time you have left for this section should be spent calculating as many of the industry average ratios as you can.
Pick the quickest ones first (return on capital employed is a pretty quick one for example).Again, you would not be expected to do all the ratios in the time. If you look at the marking scheme you will see that the maximum marks for each bit of that part of the question add up to 15 marks. Even if you had a perfect answer you would only get 12 marks, so it means that you could miss bits out and still get 12 marks (if you see what I mean). This often happens – and it does mean that you do not need perfect answers to still get full marks.
Getting full marks on any part is difficult, but everyone should be able to get certainly half marks reasonably quickly.
Hope that helps!
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.