• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

How many risks to be written?

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AAA Exams › How many risks to be written?

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by Kim Smith.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 20, 2018 at 4:04 pm #485337
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    Dear tutor,
    I am retaking my AAA exam and one of the things I assume I lost my marks on is an inadequate answer. Could you kindly give me an Idea of how many audit risks I should evaluate for, say 20 marks question. I can never figure out the marks laid out on marking guides. ‘2 marks for each audit risk evaluated, 1 for relevant calculations and .5 for materiality all adding up to 20 marks.’. Does that 2 marks include analytical procedures and materiality calculations? Please help.

    November 21, 2018 at 7:56 am #485378
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 133
    • Replies: 8301
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    If we take S18 Q1 as an example – 24 marks for audit risks including the use of analytical procedures. The examiner’s report states “OF THESE, up to five marks were available for the calculations forming part of the analytical review and up to four marks could be obtained for relevant materiality calculations and conclusions.” So you should have been looking for around 15 marks for the evaluation of significant risks. Some risks EVALUATED were worth up to 3 marks – others 2 marks. Playing safe, looking to evaluate 8 risks would have provided a full answer.

    The examiner’s report provides LOTS of guidance – I urge you to read it https://www.accaglobal.com/uk/en/student/exam-support-resources/professional-exams-study-resources/p7/examiners-reports.html

    I also recommend to you our new articles and video specifically aimed at tackling this exam https://opentuition.com/acca/aaa/advanced-audit-assurance-tackle-exam/

    November 26, 2018 at 11:32 am #486015
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    Thank you sir. If I pass this time, I owe a large part of it to OpenTuition and you, of course.

    November 27, 2018 at 8:40 am #486111
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 133
    • Replies: 8301
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You’re very welcome!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • The topic ‘How many risks to be written?’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • maryrena77 on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • vi234 on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour
  • vi234 on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour
  • John Moffat on The financial management environment – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Lekhanaa on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in