Forums › FIA Forums › MA2 Managing Costs and Finance Forums › High Low Method Question .Help Required
- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by myacca1990.
- AuthorPosts
- April 2, 2015 at 1:50 am #239868
Q:The following data are records of output levels and overhead costs.
Hours Worked , 18,000 (January) , 21,000(December)
Total Costs , $86,800 ( January ) , $97,438(December)There was 3% inflation between january and december .The variable cost per hour worked,at January price levels and to the nearest $0.01 ,is:
A)$4.52
B)$2.68
C)$3.55
D)$2.60According to kaplan the correct answer is D but after hitting my head to the wall several times i cannot figure out how they came up with that answer. ?Can someone here please explain?
April 2, 2015 at 4:07 am #239877I assume you understand how Hi-low method works so I will skip explaining deep into it.
There was inflation of 3% between Jan to Dec, hence you will need to calculate what is the value in Dec if no inflation takes place.
$97,438/1.03=$94,600After getting the value in Dec excluded inflation you can continue your calculation by using Hi-low method.
($94,600-$86,800)/(21,000-18,000)=$2.60April 3, 2015 at 8:03 pm #240057Ok got it pal thanks for the answer 🙂
April 3, 2015 at 9:15 pm #240058@vince5301 said:
I assume you understand how Hi-low method works so I will skip explaining deep into it.There was inflation of 3% between Jan to Dec, hence you will need to calculate what is the value in Dec if no inflation takes place.
$97,438/1.03=$94,600After getting the value in Dec excluded inflation you can continue your calculation by using Hi-low method.
($94,600-$86,800)/(21,000-18,000)=$2.60And one thing is a bit unclear sorry i am not much mathematically inclined .Why you divided 97,438 by 1.03? Are not we just supposed to minus 3% value of 97,438 from 97,438?
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.