- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by .
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- The topic ‘Hadley v Baxandle 1854 contd’ is closed to new replies.
Interactive BPP books for September 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA LW Exams › Hadley v Baxandle 1854 contd
1)Sir I was asking because of my conceptual understanding that the closing of mill was a general loss or was it a special loss?
2) Consideration must pass from both parties na i.e promisor and promisee?
1) That I understand
What I don’t understand is why you are wasting your time on something that has no chance in my lifetime of ever being appropriate as an answer to an F4 question!
2) Yes … with very rare exceptions such as in a specialty contract where two-way consideration is not necessary
