• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

fubuki co december 2010

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › fubuki co december 2010

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by AvatarJohn Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 26, 2018 at 6:19 am #469445
    Avatarjihun lee
    Member
    • Topics: 117
    • Replies: 51
    • ☆☆

    1. For reducing tax allowable depreciation ( TAD ) method for example

    Plant cost 3 million
    Reducing balance method 25%
    Tax rate 30%

    For first year when we calculate TAD, ITS 3million x 0.25 x 0.3

    However for straight line basis
    (Same example as above and 3 years)

    Shouldnt it be 3million / 3 years x 0.3 ?

    I do not understand why tax amount is not multiplied in the fubuki co question after dividing into number of years.

    Because in TAMPEM reducing balance method, they did multiply with tax rate.

    2. Since TAD amount is deducted before calculating taxable profit, shouldnt we suppose to add TAD back ?

    3. Why centrally allocated overhead is excluded ? Shouldnt we take into account the whole fixed overhead and increase per inflation rate for each year ?

    August 26, 2018 at 7:43 am #469472
    AvatarJohn Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54839
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    1. The TAD is straight line. The plant and machinery is sold after 4 years, so we divide by 4 and not by 3 !!

    The TAD has been subtracted to get the taxable profit and the tax calculated on that, which is one of the two approaches to dealing with the TAD (both of which obviously give the same answer).

    2. The TAD has not been subtracted in the cash flow workings (only in arriving at the tax figure) and so there is nothing to add back.

    3. They are never included – the total cost for the firm will not change and so there is no extra cash flow.

    It is obvious that you have not watched my lectures, because everything you have asked here is explained in the lectures. You cannot learn for this exam by simply working through past questions without having studied first, and you certainly cannot expect me to keep typing out extracts from my free lectures!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘fubuki co december 2010’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Anna1207 on ACCA P4 Question 1 December 2014 part 1
  • BigT on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • NaveenMatt on Foreign exchange risk management (1) Part 5 – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • NaveenMatt on Corporate Reorganisation and Capital Reconstruction Schemes (part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • Liquidvibz on CIMA P1 Standard Costing

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in