- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by .
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
- The topic ‘Fubuki Co (Dec 10) – Kaplan Exam Kit – Question 36’ is closed to new replies.
OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Fubuki Co (Dec 10) – Kaplan Exam Kit – Question 36
In this part (a) of this question, when calculating the cost of equity in working 2, they have assumed that the cost of debt of Haizum Co is equal to the five-year government debt yield.
Why have they done that?
The formula is a Modigliani and Miller formula, and M&M assume throughout their theories that debt is risk free. The government debt is regarded as being risk free and therefore determines the risk free rate.
If you had used 7.5% in the formula instead, you would almost certainly still have got the marks.
Understood. Thank you so much!
You are welcome 🙂