- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by .
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
- The topic ‘Forecasting’ is closed to new replies.
Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA MA – FIA FMA › Forecasting
Hi John. Could you please help me with the question 4a.5 in MA Kit?
Using data from twelve European countries, it has been calculated that the correlation between the level of car ownership and the number of road deaths is 0.73.
So, why the option “High levels of car ownership cause high levels of road deaths” is wrong?
Thank you so much in advance.
A high degree of correlation means that the two things move fairly well together, but never proves that one causes the other.
For example, suppose there is a high correlation between the amount of alcohol people drink and the number of heart attacks. That might mean that alcohol causes heart attacks, but it might simply be that people who drink a lot of alcohol also eat lots of fried food and that it is the fried food that causes the heart attacks and not the alcohol.
(That is one of the dangers in real life – that people quote statistics saying that they are proof of something when they do not actually prove it 🙂 )
Thank you so much John.
You are welcome 🙂
