Followup

This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by MikeLittle.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

Author
Posts
January 29, 2018 at 3:12 pm #433818
bilo1
Member
- Topics: 3
- Replies: 0
So in the question , the damages awarded was cost of rebuilding?
However, in Ruxley Electronics v Forsyth damages awarded was the difference between the pool as it has been completed and its value if it had been properly completed?
January 29, 2018 at 3:15 pm #433819
MikeLittle
Keymaster
- Topics: 27
- Replies: 23368
Humai! I explained that in enough detail in my response – for the swimming pool the cost of rectification would be disproportionate to the loss of amenity whereas for the wall it should not have been phenomenally expensive to repair the breached wall
OK?
Author
Posts

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

The topic ‘Followup’ is closed to new replies.