• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exam Results

Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

FloPro Plc

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › FloPro Plc

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 19, 2018 at 7:37 am #437946
    myacca1990
    Participant
    • Topics: 153
    • Replies: 164
    • ☆☆☆

    Posting this because i think there is a mistake made in kaplan solution kit.
    In this question we are required to calculate the mix (units) of products A and B which will maximize net profit and the value of that net profit.
    Production/sales of A and B 120000 and 45000.
    Max demand for each product is 20% above estimated sales level.

    Flopro has decided to determine the profit maximising mix of products A and B based on the Throughput accounting principle of maximising the throughput return per production hour of the bottleneck resources.

    I have no problem to calculate the throughput return per bottleneck hour and to calculate the mixture of A and B for max profit.
    My question is regarding the value of net profit.
    In the solution when the throughput return per product is calculated we used the max demand in units for A (144000) and the rest of the available hours in units for B which is 13000 units.
    But then the overhead calculation used the original units’ amount such as 120,000 and 45,000 to deduct the variable overhead expenses.
    Ok does not matter how much we produce actually i got it the fixed production overheads does not change but the variable production overhead cost vary with production.so why the real production values of 144000 and 13000 were not used instead?

    February 19, 2018 at 5:31 pm #437992
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54705
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    There is no mistake, and you are obviously not watching my free lectures, because I explain this very point in the lectures – you really cannot expect me to type them all out here!!

    Unless told otherwise we assume that the costings were prepared before we knew about the constraints. Therefore they were done assuming that we produced to meet full demand. So we can calculate the total fixed overheads using the budget figures, and this total will not change even though they end of producing fewer units.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘FloPro Plc’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • RitikaR29 on Financial management objectives – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Krishadarwin on Strategy : real life examples – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • mabdullah31 on Conceptual Framework – ACCA SBR lecture
  • MikeLittle on Illegalities – ACCA Corporate and Business Law (LW) (ENG)
  • roksy on Illegalities – ACCA Corporate and Business Law (LW) (ENG)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in