A company is considering establishing a plant. Land was purchased two years ago on which it intends to build its new plant. Should the cost of land be included as a relevant cost. In my answer I excluded it because I thought it was a sunk cost. However the answer included it as a relevant cost. Why ?
Is the question asking you to appraise using DCF? What will they do with the land if they do not build the new plant?
Without seeing the full question, I cannot say why they have not treated it as a sunk cost.
Author
Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Cookies
We serve cookies. If you think that's ok, just click "Accept all". You can also choose what kind of cookies you want by clicking "Settings". Read our cookie policy