• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Finance leasing

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Finance leasing

  • This topic has 19 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 20 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 22, 2016 at 2:33 am #341290
    complicated
    Member
    • Topics: 110
    • Replies: 210
    • β˜†β˜†β˜†

    Hi tutor,

    I’ve watched your lectures on finance leases and was able to understand them. I’ve attempted a few questions from BPP kit and got them right too, but not for this question 162 from Kaplan revision kit:

    On 1 Apr 2007, Fino increased the operating capacity of its plant. Fino entered into an agreement to lease the plant, which has a fair value of $350,000, from the manufacturer. The lease required four annual payments in advance of $100,000 each commencing on 1 Apr 2007. The plant would have a useful life of four years and would be scrapped at the end of this period. Prepare extracts of fino’a statement of profit or loss and statement of financial position for the year ended 30 September 2007 in respect of the rental agreement assuming it is a finance lease. Use an implicit interest rate of 10% per annum.

    I got both the carrying value of the asset and interest payments right using the actuarial method, but got the non current (NCL) and current liabilities (CL) wrong.

    My answer:
    NCL: 184,406 – balance at 30 sept 2008
    CL: $78,094 (262,500 [balance at 30 sept2007] – 184,406)
    Here are my workings:

    Balance at 1 apr 2007 $350,000
    Installment ($100,000)
    Balance at 1 apr 2007 $250,000
    Interest for 6 months @ 5% 12,500
    Balance at 30 sept 2007 $262,500
    Interest for 6 months $13,125
    Balance at 1 Apr 2008 $275,625
    Installment ($100,000)
    Balance at 1 Apr 2008 $175,625
    Interest for 6 months $8,781
    Balance at 30 sept 2008 $184,406

    The model answer:
    NCL: $175,000 (250,000-75,000)
    CL: $87,500

    I believe this was taken from an ACCA december 2007 paper and the solution there is exactly the same as what’s written in the kit (thus no explanation at all).

    Did I get something wrong?

    Hope you could help me on this, thanks πŸ™‚

    September 22, 2016 at 1:08 pm #341378
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†

    I believe that the issue here is ‘How do we calculate the interest when the instalment payment date does not coincide with the accounting year end?’

    That second instalment of $100,000 pays off the interest from the first 6 months ($12,500) and the interest from the second 6 months

    The calculation for the second 6 months interest is surely 10% for half a year based on $250,000 and not on $262,500

    So the capital element that will be settled by that second instalment is $75,000 and that means that the non-current liability is $250,000 – $75,000 = $175,000

    Does that explain it for you?

    September 23, 2016 at 7:18 am #341433
    complicated
    Member
    • Topics: 110
    • Replies: 210
    • β˜†β˜†β˜†

    Oh no how could I have missed that! In that case, shouldn’t then the non current liability be the balance at 30 Sept 2008? Since that amount would be settled after 12 months. Or do I have to follow the payment date of instalments?

    September 23, 2016 at 3:54 pm #341466
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†

    The ncl should be the capital balance outstanding as at 30 September 2008, yes

    September 25, 2016 at 4:24 am #341613
    complicated
    Member
    • Topics: 110
    • Replies: 210
    • β˜†β˜†β˜†

    OK, thank you πŸ™‚

    September 25, 2016 at 3:51 pm #341639
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†

    You’re welcome

    September 26, 2016 at 4:22 am #341699
    complicated
    Member
    • Topics: 110
    • Replies: 210
    • β˜†β˜†β˜†

    Hi

    September 26, 2016 at 4:25 am #341703
    complicated
    Member
    • Topics: 110
    • Replies: 210
    • β˜†β˜†β˜†

    Sorry mike, I’ve been trying to post questions since yesterday but every time I click submit it loads into a “blank” page with only the heading of my question. What’s going on and what should I do? Tried posting on the technical problem forum but couldn’t as well. The only way I could communicate here is to reply to your response…

    September 26, 2016 at 6:57 am #341710
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†

    So reply to this response and we’re cooking with gas!

    September 26, 2016 at 10:38 am #341725
    complicated
    Member
    • Topics: 110
    • Replies: 210
    • β˜†β˜†β˜†

    Apparently I can’t type a long response too πŸ™

    September 26, 2016 at 10:44 am #341728
    complicated
    Member
    • Topics: 110
    • Replies: 210
    • β˜†β˜†β˜†

    Tried splitting the question up too, the odds surely are against me. I’ll try again when I get home!

    September 26, 2016 at 1:44 pm #341753
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†

    Well, I’ve received both of these

    Maybe you’re pushing the wrong key when selecting which forum you want to post onto?

    September 29, 2016 at 3:14 am #341698
    complicated
    Member
    • Topics: 110
    • Replies: 210
    • β˜†β˜†β˜†

    Hi Mike,

    I’m confused with the calculation of closing inventory in this question: Highwood co ACCA June 2011 question 2

    The inventory of Highwood was not counted until 4 April 2011 due to operational reasons. At this date it’s value at cost was $36m and this figure has been used in the trial balance. Between the year end of 31 march 2011 and 4 April 2011, Highwood received a delivery of goods at a cost of $2.7m and made sales of $7.8m at a mark up on cost of 30%. Neither the goods delivered nor the sales made in this period were included in highwood’s purchases or revenue in the above trial balance.

    The increase in closing inventory as given in the answer:
    Delivered goods $(2.7m)
    Cost of goods sold $6m
    Increase in closing inventory $3.3m

    My doubt:
    “Received a delivery of goods at $2.7m…” doesn’t this mean that inventory would have increased?

    And “made sales of $7.8m….” means that $6m worth of inventory would have left the closing balance?

    Therefore my answer was:
    Goods received $2.7m
    Goods delivered ($6m)
    Decrease in closing inventory 3.3m

    I have another doubt too:
    The selling price was $2.4m and they were sold at a gross profit margin of 25%. What should the cost of inventory be?

    The exam answer:
    $2.4m x 0.75 = $1.8m

    Shouldnt it be:
    $2.4m x 1.0/1.25 = 1.92m?

    This was taken from Kaplan revision kit question 190 on Keystone Co.

    Hope you could advise me on these, thanks πŸ™‚

    September 29, 2016 at 3:14 am #341700
    complicated
    Member
    • Topics: 110
    • Replies: 210
    • β˜†β˜†β˜†

    Hi Mike,

    I’m confused with the calculation of closing inventory in this question: Highwood co ACCA June 2011 question 2

    The inventory of Highwood was not counted until 4 April 2011 due to operational reasons. At this date it’s value at cost was $36m and this figure has been used in the trial balance. Between the year end of 31 march 2011 and 4 April 2011, Highwood received a delivery of goods at a cost of $2.7m and made sales of $7.8m at a mark up on cost of 30%. Neither the goods delivered nor the sales made in this period were included in highwood’s purchases or revenue in the above trial balance.

    The increase in closing inventory as given in the answer:
    Delivered goods $(2.7m)
    Cost of goods sold $6m
    Increase in closing inventory $3.3m

    My doubt:
    “Received a delivery of goods at $2.7m…” doesn’t this mean that inventory would have increased?

    And “made sales of $7.8m….” means that $6m worth of inventory would have left the closing balance?

    Therefore my answer was:
    Goods received $2.7m
    Goods delivered ($6m)
    Decrease in closing inventory 3.3m

    I have another doubt too:
    The selling price was $2.4m and they were sold at a gross profit margin of 25%. What should the cost of inventory be?

    The exam answer:
    $2.4m x 0.75 = $1.8m

    Shouldnt it be:
    $2.4m x 1.0/1.25 = 1.92m?

    This was taken from Kaplan revision kit question 190 on Keystone Co.

    Hope you could advise me on these, thanks πŸ™‚

    September 29, 2016 at 3:14 am #341701
    complicated
    Member
    • Topics: 110
    • Replies: 210
    • β˜†β˜†β˜†

    ^ sorry had some problems with the website just now

    Hi Mike,

    I’m confused with the calculation of closing inventory in this question: Highwood co ACCA June 2011 question 2

    The inventory of Highwood was not counted until 4 April 2011 due to operational reasons. At this date it’s value at cost was $36m and this figure has been used in the trial balance. Between the year end of 31 march 2011 and 4 April 2011, Highwood received a delivery of goods at a cost of $2.7m and made sales of $7.8m at a mark up on cost of 30%. Neither the goods delivered nor the sales made in this period were included in highwood’s purchases or revenue in the above trial balance.

    The increase in closing inventory as given in the answer:
    Delivered goods $(2.7m)
    Cost of goods sold $6m
    Increase in closing inventory $3.3m

    My doubt:
    “Received a delivery of goods at $2.7m…” doesn’t this mean that inventory would have increased?

    And “made sales of $7.8m….” means that $6m worth of inventory would have left the closing balance?

    Therefore my answer was:
    Goods received $2.7m
    Goods delivered ($6m)
    Decrease in closing inventory 3.3m

    I have another doubt too:
    The selling price was $2.4m and they were sold at a gross profit margin of 25%. What should the cost of inventory be?

    The exam answer:
    $2.4m x 0.75 = $1.8m

    Shouldnt it be:
    $2.4m x 1.0/1.25 = 1.92m?

    This was taken from Kaplan revision kit question 190 on Keystone Co.

    Hope you could advise me on these, thanks πŸ™‚

    September 29, 2016 at 3:14 am #341721
    complicated
    Member
    • Topics: 110
    • Replies: 210
    • β˜†β˜†β˜†

    Haha alright I hope this works.

    I’m confused with the calculation of closing inventory in this question: Highwood co ACCA June 2011 question 2

    The inventory of Highwood was not counted until 4 April 2011 due to operational reasons. At this date it’s value at cost was $36m and this figure has been used in the trial balance. Between the year end of 31 march 2011 and 4 April 2011, Highwood received a delivery of goods at a cost of $2.7m and made sales of $7.8m at a mark up on cost of 30%. Neither the goods delivered nor the sales made in this period were included in highwood’s purchases or revenue in the above trial balance.

    The increase in closing inventory as given in the answer:
    Delivered goods $(2.7m)
    Cost of goods sold $6m
    Increase in closing inventory $3.3m

    My doubt:
    “Received a delivery of goods at $2.7m…” doesn’t this mean that inventory would have increased?

    And “made sales of $7.8m….” means that $6m worth of inventory would have left the closing balance?

    Therefore my answer was:
    Goods received $2.7m
    Goods delivered ($6m)
    Decrease in closing inventory 3.3m

    I have another doubt too:
    The selling price was $2.4m and they were sold at a gross profit margin of 25%. What should the cost of inventory be?

    The exam answer:
    $2.4m x 0.75 = $1.8m

    Shouldnt it be:
    $2.4m x 1.0/1.25 = 1.92m?

    This was taken from Kaplan revision kit question 190 on Keystone Co.

    Hope you could advise me on these, thanks πŸ™‚

    September 29, 2016 at 3:14 am #341722
    complicated
    Member
    • Topics: 110
    • Replies: 210
    • β˜†β˜†β˜†

    i hope this works!

    Hi Mike,

    I’m confused with the calculation of closing inventory in this question: Highwood co ACCA June 2011 question 2

    The inventory of Highwood was not counted until 4 April 2011 due to operational reasons. At this date it’s value at cost was $36m and this figure has been used in the trial balance. Between the year end of 31 march 2011 and 4 April 2011, Highwood received a delivery of goods at a cost of $2.7m and made sales of $7.8m at a mark up on cost of 30%. Neither the goods delivered nor the sales made in this period were included in highwood’s purchases or revenue in the above trial balance

    September 29, 2016 at 3:14 am #341724
    complicated
    Member
    • Topics: 110
    • Replies: 210
    • β˜†β˜†β˜†

    Hi Mike,

    I’m confused with the calculation of closing inventory in this question: Highwood co ACCA June 2011 question 2

    The inventory of Highwood was not counted until 4 April 2011 due to operational reasons. At this date it’s value at cost was $36m and this figure has been used in the trial balance. Between the year end of 31 march 2011 and 4 April 2011, Highwood received a delivery of goods at a cost of $2.7m and made sales of $7.8m at a mark up on cost of 30%. Neither the goods delivered nor the sales made in this period were included in highwood’s purchases or revenue in the above trial balance.

    September 29, 2016 at 3:14 am #341726
    complicated
    Member
    • Topics: 110
    • Replies: 210
    • β˜†β˜†β˜†

    I’m confused with the calculation of closing inventory in this question: Highwood co ACCA June 2011 question 2

    The inventory of Highwood was not counted until 4 April 2011 due to operational reasons. At this date it’s value at cost was $36m and this figure has been used in the trial balance. Between the year end of 31 march 2011 and 4 April 2011, Highwood received a delivery of goods at a cost of $2.7m and made sales of $7.8m at a mark up on cost of 30%. Neither the goods delivered nor the sales made in this period were included in highwood’s purchases or revenue in the above trial balance.

    September 29, 2016 at 3:14 am #341727
    complicated
    Member
    • Topics: 110
    • Replies: 210
    • β˜†β˜†β˜†

    this question: Highwood co ACCA June 2011 question

    The inventory of Highwood was not counted until 4 April 2011 due to operational reasons. At this date it’s value at cost was $36m and this figure has been used in the trial balance. Between the year end of 31 march 2011 and 4 April 2011, Highwood received a delivery of goods at a cost of $2.7m and made sales of $7.8m at a mark up on cost of 30%. Neither the goods delivered nor the sales made in this period were included in highwood’s purchases or revenue in the above trial balance.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 20 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options: Β β€œRead the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • John Moffat on Objectives of organisations – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • alexgriff10 on Objectives of organisations – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • MidnightWolfie on Operating segments (IFRS 8) – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • John Moffat on Investment Appraisal Under Uncertainty: Expected Values (example 2) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Dinomain on Investment Appraisal Under Uncertainty: Expected Values (example 2) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 Β· Support Β· Contact Β· Advertising Β· OpenLicense Β· About Β· Sitemap Β· Comments Β· Log in