• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

F9 Dec 13 EOQ with Buffer Stock

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA FM Financial Management Forums › F9 Dec 13 EOQ with Buffer Stock

  • This topic has 8 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by Ngu.
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 6, 2013 at 10:21 pm #151360
    Ngu
    Participant
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 34
    • ☆

    Hi Mike. Thanks for the support you have rendered many of us to this end. How do one calculate EOQ and hence minimum cost of holding stock given that there is buffer stock. I have fogotten the numbers , only that the question said buffer stock is 10% of mothly demand which turned out to be 10000 units. I am taught that one of the assumptions of EOQ is that there is NO buffer stock. My BPP module does not have the guidance and neigther does the Kaplan module. Thanks

    December 7, 2013 at 12:56 am #151389
    reeb1350
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 13
    • ☆

    I hope I did it correctly.

    Holing cost, with buffer stock: (10000 x $1) + ( $1 x EOQ value / 2) = whatever it was I don’t remember!

    My assumption is that the company keeps buffer stock throughout the year. Then, you need to find the holing cost based on the quantity given by the EOQ and add them all together. I hope it’s correct!

    December 7, 2013 at 5:14 am #151401
    Ngu
    Participant
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 34
    • ☆

    How then did you calculate the total ordering costs to add to the holding cost. I just ignored the buffer component only to realise the holding costs and ordering cost could not equal each other as they should when the total cost is minimised

    December 7, 2013 at 5:48 am #151403
    ninska
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 66
    • ☆☆

    reeb is right. Buffer is always there, so has nothing to do with order quantity.
    There was similar question in Dec 2010, you can have a look at the answer in ACCA website.

    December 7, 2013 at 7:46 pm #151552
    Ngu
    Participant
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 34
    • ☆

    Ninska I have gone through the answer as you suggested. The examiner put a tutorial note that the cost of holding buffer stock can be ignored since it does not change when either of the policies is implemented. I guess it needed an open mind aproach. Surprisingly i printed the dec 2010 paper intending to practise on it but i dont know how i skipped it when i did most of the other F9 past papers. Thanks. All I know is ill be doing P papers next sitting

    December 8, 2013 at 6:26 pm #151682
    neilsolaris
    Member
    • Topics: 59
    • Replies: 415
    • ☆☆☆

    That’s a good point Ngu, that the buffer holding cost will be the same (in this particular question), whether using the existing system, or the EOQ system. I can’t remember how the question was phrased now, but I have a feeling it asked for the total costs, and in which case I assume they wanted us to include the buffet holding cost. If you didn’t include it, I guess you could have made a note, that you didn’t include it because it would be the same in either scenario, and wouldn’t have influenced the decision.

    December 8, 2013 at 7:48 pm #151704
    reeb1350
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 13
    • ☆

    Ngu,

    the ordering cost is as usual, you dont need to work out your buffer stock in this.
    Buffer cost is to do with HOLDING of the stock as the holding cost per unit per year.
    ordering cost= cost of ordering x demand / EOQ

    hope that helps

    December 9, 2013 at 4:45 pm #151829
    jemma242
    Member
    • Topics: 81
    • Replies: 96
    • ☆☆

    thats good i did buffer as 10000 on each calculation as it was 40% of sales which were spread evenly throughout the year!!! which was ($300,000/12)*40% gave us the buffer which i added to average inventory x holding cost!

    December 9, 2013 at 4:54 pm #151833
    Ngu
    Participant
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 34
    • ☆

    Thanks guys . I get the logic

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • vi234 on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour
  • vi234 on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour
  • John Moffat on The financial management environment – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Lekhanaa on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • wZaidhan on Sources of Finance – Islamic Finance – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in