Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA AA Audit and Assurance Forums › *** F8 June 2015 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***
- This topic has 209 replies, 84 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by cardine.
- AuthorPosts
- June 4, 2015 at 10:26 pm #253407
Really enjoyed that paper. Hoping for a pass on 1st August. I think question 3 was the hardest. I had them both down as material but receivables as qualified report and the inventory as disclaimer of opinion. Any thoughts on that?
June 4, 2015 at 10:40 pm #253411The inventory was not pervasive, pervasive means that it renders the financial statements unreliable and this misstatement has was only affected the receivables figure in the financial statements. I think it was verifying the inventory amount since they couldn’t do year end inventory count again,
June 4, 2015 at 10:47 pm #253413Very lengthy, i jst wish i ws awarded extra 30 min, then i wud confidently say i passed. Goodluck every1
June 4, 2015 at 10:50 pm #253414The multiple choice question with internal auditors being never independent.
A colleague said that you could outsource the internal audit department.
I put the question to you, who would they be reporting to and who will be paying them, wouldn’t it be management and if they wanted to keep the contract wouldn’t they do as management requested.
June 4, 2015 at 10:53 pm #253415AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
@ all
PLEASE MENTION THE NUMBERs OF 1 MARK MCQs thanks in adv
June 4, 2015 at 10:57 pm #253417That’s me, i ws hoping for the invigilator to jst shut up for atleast another 15min
June 5, 2015 at 12:05 am #253426What was the title of Q6 part A again?
June 5, 2015 at 2:20 am #253437My mcq answers
1.D
2.A
3.A
4.A
5.B
6.B
7.C
8.B
9.C
10.A
11.B
12.AJune 5, 2015 at 2:22 am #253438@haisam
There were 4 mcq for 1markJune 5, 2015 at 2:32 am #253439Both were material but not persuasive
June 5, 2015 at 2:42 am #253440I starts with D and end with D !!! Thats all i remember !!!!
June 5, 2015 at 4:37 am #253450Lengthy paper compared to the time limit. Also , I could not find out the answer to the question Internal control components :S
June 5, 2015 at 6:46 am #253477fair exam
June 5, 2015 at 7:00 am #253481AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
Paper was fairly ok. Could manage to do 75% of the paper.
June 5, 2015 at 7:45 am #253504Hi, what about question – should auditor use IAS if local AS do not agree to IAS?
June 5, 2015 at 7:46 am #253505Nope the IAS do not override local legislation.
June 5, 2015 at 7:46 am #253506i dont think so second was pervasive..
June 5, 2015 at 7:48 am #253508You mean inventory was pervasive?
June 5, 2015 at 7:48 am #253509well said buddy
June 5, 2015 at 7:50 am #253510inventory and receivables both were material i think..
June 5, 2015 at 9:00 am #253522Hi all,
I had a lot more D answers to mcq than most of you which I did think was strange.
Overall the exam was fair although I agree it may as well been a substantive procedure exam, which is a key syllabus element, but I would have expected to see more on audit opinion, final report and reports to management.
I had Receivables as material not pervasive – qualified with an emphasis of matter paragraph. Inventory as material and pervasive – disclaimer
Messed up on Q2 part a and Q5 part b, but hopefully did enough to pass.
Good luck everyone for August 1st
June 5, 2015 at 9:32 am #253529AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 7
- ☆
Is there a thing that ACCA will not reward a mark for the MCQ if same was not presented on both question & answer paper??
June 5, 2015 at 9:34 am #253531The paper was fair but time was not enough.
June 5, 2015 at 9:43 am #253533AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 7
- ☆
if qualifay a given audit report, you dont need to have an “emphasis of matter paragraph” rather you would have a “basis for opinion paragraph” above the opinion paragraph. then refer this paragraph back when you qualifay the report on the opinion paragraph.
emphasis of matter paragraph only required if there is a thing that needs user to make focus on (material uncertainity of events in the future) & its properly disclosed on the body of FS
1- receivable was material but not pervassive—qualified with the except for
2-inventory was both material & pervassive–disclaimer opinion!!June 5, 2015 at 9:55 am #253537AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 7
- ☆
@lilit- the answer is true for that question as that was(significance change of ownership) one of the factor that leads the engagement leter to be revised !!
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘*** F8 June 2015 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***’ is closed to new replies.