Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA FR Financial Reporting Forums › *** F7 June 2016 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***
- This topic has 456 replies, 63 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by accastudent1986.
- AuthorPosts
- June 9, 2016 at 8:35 am #321350
Wasn’t talking to you Adam
June 9, 2016 at 8:36 am #321351@accastudent1986 said:
Wasn’t talking to you AdamThen, sorry! π
June 9, 2016 at 8:41 am #321355Here’s what the study text says;
“In relation to a bundled sale, any discount should generally be allocated across each component in the transaction. A discount should only be allocated to a specific component of the transaction if that component is regularly sold separately at a discount.”
Here’s what the question says;
“Revenue includes an amount of $16 million for a sale made on 1 April 2015. The sale relates to a single product
and includes ongoing servicing from Downing Co for four years. The normal selling price of the product and the
servicing would be $18 million and $500,000 per annum ($2 million in total) respectively”So without question the scenario described is a ‘bundle’ sold at a discount (as in sold for less than the usual sale price)
June 9, 2016 at 9:01 am #321369exam was kind of oka. i think i scored well in sectionB. but lost it in mcq. ii wish i clear it. dont wanna go through the full cycle again.
June 9, 2016 at 9:15 am #320578@gavin23 said:
Don’t see how middle one gives controlRevisit IFRS 10
@emo777 said:
Yeah bro, in goodwill calculation, what was your pre acquisition? They had opening retained earnings of 8600 and 3000 loss for the yearI can’t remember now i forget the other information in the question but i think it ended up that 1,500 of the loss occurred after acquisition and there were no other adjustments? so 8600-1500
June 9, 2016 at 9:15 am #320789@accastudent1986 said:
Remind me what the question said about the deferred tax asset/liability?@accastudent1986 said:
Remind me what the question said about the deferred tax asset/liability?She means q1
June 9, 2016 at 9:15 am #321073@emo777 said:
No, there is no such a requirement.@accastudent1986 said:
No that’s right it was the correct answer as parent can be exempt from preparing consolidated statements if the subsidiary is held for resale (regarded as investment property effectively). I selected that, the parent produces and the shares not publicly tradedRead this chapter in BPP book, this has been excluded
June 9, 2016 at 9:25 am #321386@emo777 said:
Read this chapter in BPP book, this has been excludedI’ve already conceded on that point we are discussing revenue recognition from Q3
June 9, 2016 at 10:13 am #321394@accastudent1986 said:
Here’s what the study text says;“In relation to a bundled sale, any discount should generally be allocated across each component in the transaction. A discount should only be allocated to a specific component of the transaction if that component is regularly sold separately at a discount.”
Here’s what the question says;
“Revenue includes an amount of $16 million for a sale made on 1 April 2015. The sale relates to a single product
and includes ongoing servicing from Downing Co for four years. The normal selling price of the product and the
servicing would be $18 million and $500,000 per annum ($2 million in total) respectively”So without question the scenario described is a ‘bundle’ sold at a discount (as in sold for less than the usual sale price)
I did the revenue recognition the same way as accastudent1986. I read it as the total sale was 16M so credits to revenue and deferred income have to total 16M, not 20M. Revenue = 16M * 18/20 + 16M * .5/20. Deferred = 16M * 1.5/20.
June 9, 2016 at 11:18 am #321407No it is not. . That only pertains to revaluation Increase with a deferred tax consequence. In this case we were asked to ignore. It would have been a credit in the pnl
June 9, 2016 at 11:25 am #321415I am getting confused since it seems people are jumping between 1 n 3 so fast..someone mentioned the increase in the fv instruments for the parent went to oci. Then the revaluations at acquisition also went to oci. I was saying only post acq revaluations go to oci.. But even if… Based on the question the financial instrument was fv through Pn L
June 9, 2016 at 11:47 am #321419AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- β
Same here..i got a lot of bs
June 9, 2016 at 12:27 pm #321432Guys, does someone remember there was one mcq and the forst option there was that gain on revaluation is recognized at the disposal of asset or smth like that. I chose it to be incorrect, who remembers?
June 9, 2016 at 1:16 pm #321448@emo777 said:
Guys, does someone remember there was one mcq and the forst option there was that gain on revaluation is recognized at the disposal of asset or smth like that. I chose it to be incorrect, who remembers?Was that the one about a previously revalued asset?
June 9, 2016 at 2:13 pm #321461@accastudent1986 said:
Was that the one about a previously revalued asset?I dont remember exaxtly, but this statemrnt was in option A of that mcq, and i chose it wrong. There were four in toral and i chose two correct options
June 9, 2016 at 4:28 pm #321535@christa316 said:
I am getting confused since it seems people are jumping between 1 n 3 so fast..someone mentioned the increase in the fv instruments for the parent went to oci. Then the revaluations at acquisition also went to oci. I was saying only post acq revaluations go to oci.. But even if… Based on the question the financial instrument was fv through Pn LSurley someone know the best approach for question 2. I think the points being argued for Q 1 and 3 would make only a mark or 2 different? But theres a 15 mark question not yet discussed
June 9, 2016 at 7:17 pm #321684MCQs were hard and confusing. There was even one on absorption costing :S
June 9, 2016 at 7:56 pm #321718@yvans said:
MCQs were hard and confusing. There was even one on absorption costing :S600000/100000=6 per unit and then multiply by 3000 units
June 9, 2016 at 8:10 pm #321735I think the 30 mark question should be faced out from f3.
June 9, 2016 at 8:12 pm #321736The 30 mark question should be removed from f7
June 9, 2016 at 10:01 pm #321775Hello there, anyone could help pls? It would be great to see asap the official solutions for the question before the next exam session…
June 10, 2016 at 6:53 am #321835So when and where will these solutions be available? Thanks
June 10, 2016 at 11:14 am #321940How does everyone remember *exactly* what the questions were and exactly what their answers were?! I had forgotten everything the minute I walked out of the exam room!
June 10, 2016 at 11:34 am #321950For the contract asset you had to recognize revenue and cost of sale based on the amount of cost incurred to date over the total experience expected cost. The difference being the profit would then be added to the 5000 for contract asset in the sofp
June 10, 2016 at 11:34 am #321951Lets discuss question 2 for who did it.
First question for 3 marks .
I did pbit + ( equity + non current – 9 million) for both 2015 n 2016. *ROCE
I continued on with gpm opm asset turnover. Didn’t get to do a 4th. I attempted this in the last 10 min
I analysed from the roce question and noted the differences. Mentioned revenue declined slightly when comparing the periods. I think I also mentioned that this fall was due to the disc op . Since those assets generated revenue. Commented on the differences.I wonder how much marks was allocated to the ratios alone
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.