Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA FR Financial Reporting Forums › *** F7 June 2012 Exam was… Comments and Instant Poll ***
- This topic has 141 replies, 54 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by jm84.
- AuthorPosts
- June 14, 2012 at 7:35 pm #100726AnonymousInactive
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 11
- ☆
I mean the working No 2, goodwill. The cost of investments in subsidiary was 24000 + 6400 (if I am correct), deferred consideration, in total it’s 30400.
c@saiflalani said:
On the balance sheet P recognized investment at cost as $24000. That is 8000 $1 shares and $2 share premium. the qt said that It had already recognized share cost but not deferred consideration. Any one else feel free to step in.June 14, 2012 at 8:15 pm #100727AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 3
- ☆
The consideration by shares was given on the face of the balance sheet, against NCA as ‘Investment in Square’ so it was just the value of deferred consideration that you needed to calculate, and add to it.
June 15, 2012 at 6:52 am #100728the consideration consisted of two elements, the share exchange which was already accounted for and the deferred consideration. To get the share exchange amount you just had to look at Investments in Sq as goodp said. The hardest part was discounting the cash element which the question stated was NOT accounted for. You should have got a goodwill of around 30.4mil.
I initially also go a negative goodwill but then did a sense check and thought “nah, this is compeltely stupid”. anyway, good luck with the results!
June 15, 2012 at 12:57 pm #100729I just wonder why many people get a negative goodwill (I get a shock), the question is now out in the ACCA website. So we can take a look and see whether negative goodwill exists.
This is what I did:
Net assets at acquisition:
Equity: 10000
Retained Earning: 18000 – 1000 = 17000 (Adjusted for unrecorded deferred tax liability: Dr Retained earning Cr Deferred tax)
Adjustment for:
Plant: 3000Total net assets: $30000
Controlling Interest:
Share exchange: $24000 (given in question)
Deferred Consideration: $8000 x 0.88/1.1 =$6400
Total Controlling interest: 24000 + 6400 = $30400Non-controlling interest: $2000 x 3.5 = $7000
Goodwill = 30400 + 7000 – 30000 = $7400
Although my calculation may not be correct, but very obvious bargain purchase is IMPOSSIBLE as the only reason to explain is forget to add the deferred consideration.
Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
June 15, 2012 at 4:31 pm #100730AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 48
- ☆
@jm84 said:
I just wonder why many people get a negative goodwill (I get a shock), the question is now out in the ACCA website. So we can take a look and see whether negative goodwill exists.
Exact same calculation Jm84 for me. Can you point out where on the ACCA web the paper is? I cannot find it. Thanks,This is what I did:
Net assets at acquisition:
Equity: 10000
Retained Earning: 18000 – 1000 = 17000 (Adjusted for unrecorded deferred tax liability: Dr Retained earning Cr Deferred tax)
Adjustment for:
Plant: 3000Total net assets: $30000
Controlling Interest:
Share exchange: $24000 (given in question)
Deferred Consideration: $8000 x 0.88/1.1 =$6400
Total Controlling interest: 24000 + 6400 = $30400Non-controlling interest: $2000 x 3.5 = $7000
Goodwill = 30400 + 7000 – 30000 = $7400
Although my calculation may not be correct, but very obvious bargain purchase is IMPOSSIBLE as the only reason to explain is forget to add the deferred consideration.
Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
June 16, 2012 at 1:32 am #100731June 16, 2012 at 3:07 pm #100732i got bargain purchase also, 8000+7040 i think i put for total cost. forgot to take off cost of capital
June 17, 2012 at 10:34 am #100733There was definitely goodwill. I imagine people forgot the cash deferred consideration
June 17, 2012 at 10:43 am #100734AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 16
- ☆
June 17, 2012 at 3:16 pm #100735AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 48
- ☆
Thanks Jm84. I was checking that page but for some reason my browser was showing the old data and not “refreshing”. I see that in Qt 4, I completely missed the 500,000 part that was destroyed. So the rest of my working was correct but your answer is correct. Probably will lose 1-2 marks for that.
June 18, 2012 at 6:08 pm #100736AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 5
- ☆
does anyone know how ACCA scripts are marked? Will I loose for instance all the marks available for goodwill calculation if one figure would be wrong in the calculation of goodwill(e.g. forgot to account for NCI in goodwill calculation)?
June 19, 2012 at 12:32 am #100737this paper was difficult. i hated it
June 19, 2012 at 10:33 am #100738@petrochina said:
does anyone know how ACCA scripts are marked? Will I loose for instance all the marks available for goodwill calculation if one figure would be wrong in the calculation of goodwill(e.g. forgot to account for NCI in goodwill calculation)?ACCA adopts step marking, they penalise you once only for the steps you got wrong. But if your goodwill got wrong, it depends on what mistake you have done.
June 20, 2012 at 6:01 am #100739@jm84 said:
https://www.accaglobal.com/en/student/acca-qual-student-journey/qual-resource/acca-qualification/f7/past-exam-papers/international.htmlOMG, the question paper is there!
June 20, 2012 at 6:49 am #100740AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 5
- ☆
Can anybody advise if there is a chance to pass if I have missed question 5(haven’t noticed unfortunately)??
June 20, 2012 at 9:02 am #100741@kristn said:
Can anybody advise if there is a chance to pass if I have missed question 5(haven’t noticed unfortunately)??No one is able to advise your chances of passing. It depends on how well you do in the first 4 questions. As a guideline, if you manage to do correct consolidated adjustments and question 2 well (Score at least 20 marks per questions), then pass should not be a problem. I have known someone who pass by just attempting the first 3 questions. However, this is not advisable. Just wait until 8th August and you will know your result.
June 20, 2012 at 10:29 am #100742AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 5
- ☆
Thank you for reply jm84. I knew, if any question is not attempted, it means failure.
June 20, 2012 at 7:10 pm #100743AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 11
- ☆
I’ve missed question 5 too. You are not only the one. Let’s wait for the results. A year ago I scored 68 out of 4 questions on F5. I didn’t have time to answer the last question 20 marks, just wrote two sentences. Now it’s just 10 marks..:)
@kristn said:
Thank you for reply jm84. I knew, if any question is not attempted, it means failure.June 21, 2012 at 10:27 am #100744Hi I have tried to work out Question 1 and Question 2 again, and I manage to get the same answer as what i did during the exam. I manage to balance both questions but I am not sure whether I get it right. the link are as follows:
https://issuu.com/jiaminglow/docs/question_1_and_question_2?mode=window&viewMode=doublePageJune 21, 2012 at 2:33 pm #100745AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 48
- ☆
@jm84 said:
Hi I have tried to work out Question 1 and Question 2 again, and I manage to get the same answer as what i did during the exam. I manage to balance both questions but I am not sure whether I get it right. the link are as follows:
https://issuu.com/jiaminglow/docs/question_1_and_question_2?mode=window&viewMode=doublePageAll my workings were identlcal except that I depreciated leased plant in 2nd qt over 4 years. Hence Depreciation of 6.25 million versus your 5 million. I considered both options in the exam, but it was not very clear to me whether it should be based on the lease term or based on other plant depreciation methods. Now that I read it again without the adrenaline surge I think you might be right. In any case you would be hard pressed to get less than 46 in those 2 qts out of 50. Good luck.
June 21, 2012 at 3:09 pm #100746@saiflalani said:
All my workings were identlcal except that I depreciated leased plant in 2nd qt over 4 years. Hence Depreciation of 6.25 million versus your 5 million. I considered both options in the exam, but it was not very clear to me whether it should be based on the lease term or based on other plant depreciation methods. Now that I read it again without the adrenaline surge I think you might be right. In any case you would be hard pressed to get less than 46 in those 2 qts out of 50. Good luck.I also have problems in figuring out the lease terms. Initially I consider it as to have 4 years life, but there are total 5 payments, so cannot be 4 years right? Not very sure about it. hope i get it right.
The EPS thing I feel very not confident. I do not manage to get any number because I do the EPS 5 minutes before exam. so only manage to figure the weighted average number of shares then the invigilator announce stop writing. Very poor thing for me, at least 2 marks gone in EPS that part.
This is the first time I manage to balance question 1, 2 and 3 (Because when I do many mock exams only the Console Question i manage to balance). Balance doesn’t mean correct, but based on the feel that I experience, I should be able to pass this paper. (although not be able to score any decent marks). Wish me good luck 🙂
June 21, 2012 at 3:18 pm #100747AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 48
- ☆
@jm84 said:
I also have problems in figuring out the lease terms. Initially I consider it as to have 4 years life, but there are total 5 payments, so cannot be 4 years right? Not very sure about it. hope i get it right.The EPS thing I feel very not confident. I do not manage to get any number because I do the EPS 5 minutes before exam. so only manage to figure the weighted average number of shares then the invigilator announce stop writing. Very poor thing for me, at least 2 marks gone in EPS that part.
This is the first time I manage to balance question 1, 2 and 3 (Because when I do many mock exams only the Console Question i manage to balance). Balance doesn’t mean correct, but based on the feel that I experience, I should be able to pass this paper. (although not be able to score any decent marks). Wish me good luck 🙂
Well Good Luck JM8! I dont know how you define decent marks, but looks like you should score at least 46 in the first 2 qts. At least 20 in number 3 if your cash flow balanced (cash flow is almost impossible to do wrong and balance) and I am sure you would get full 4 for the ratios. Your qt 4 is fully correct (I just did not read the blow up part of 500,000…damn..hopefully should lose only 1 mark on that) and you would be hard pressed to get less than 7 in qt 5. That adds up to at least 86. I don’t know about you but I would be quite happy with that and most on this board would too.
June 21, 2012 at 3:34 pm #100748@saiflalani said:
Well Good Luck JM8! I dont know how you define decent marks, but looks like you should score at least 46 in the first 2 qts. At least 20 in number 3 if your cash flow balanced (cash flow is almost impossible to do wrong and balance) and I am sure you would get full 4 for the ratios. Your qt 4 is fully correct (I just did not read the blow up part of 500,000…damn..hopefully should lose only 1 mark on that) and you would be hard pressed to get less than 7 in qt 5. That adds up to at least 86. I don’t know about you but I would be quite happy with that and most on this board would too.Hi saiflalani
Thank you very much for your encouragement. I am a little bit dissapointed with myself after finishing F7 because I am highly time pressurised to work with question 3 part (b) and Question 2 EPS. I will only want a 70++ because I want to do my OBU degree and getting 1st class if possible. After reading your comment, I really feel better, Thanks a lot.I think you score quite well also based on your comments. The 500,000 will only cost 1 mark and the rest of the marks will still be given (ACCA adopts steps marking, so no worries).Good luck to you too 🙂
June 21, 2012 at 3:44 pm #100749AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 48
- ☆
Thanks JM84. How many exams did you take this time? I took F7 and P3.
June 21, 2012 at 4:11 pm #100750 - AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.