• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

*** F7 December 2013 Exam was.. Post your comments ***

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA FR Financial Reporting Forums › *** F7 December 2013 Exam was.. Post your comments ***

  • This topic has 160 replies, 95 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by Anonymous.
Viewing 25 posts - 26 through 50 (of 161 total)
← 1 2 3 … 5 6 7 →
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 4, 2013 at 5:35 pm #150278
    grahamdchild
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 8
    • ☆

    Out by £100 on the cashflow 🙁

    December 4, 2013 at 5:35 pm #150279
    Maria
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    Q2 didnt say if the revenue, costs, profits etc were included in revenue and cos. when it came to PUP in q 1 i couldnt figure if the 1.5m cost was based on the 9m or the older cost. time apportionment in consolidation i did included and also the retained earnings at acquisition. it was a struggle against time!

    December 4, 2013 at 5:38 pm #150281
    divy32
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 28
    • ☆

    My goodwill came out at £7,600 I think but I included contingent consideration as a current liability!!!

    December 4, 2013 at 5:40 pm #150282
    grahamdchild
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 8
    • ☆

    @Frank I am probably going to kick myself and hopefully the answers someone gives will give me a “Graham you are an idiot moment’, so I worked out my goodwill based on the shares (SC $6000/50P = 12000 shares, 75% 9000 shares X £1.35 then added my contigent consideration [mistake?] deducted my share capital, and my fair value movement my pre aq I worked it out this way I can’t recall the specifics

    R/E as per BS it was definately a positive figure, I deducted by PNL which was -£4600 deducted that off my RE @ Y/E to get my opening R/E then said Opening Retain Earnings + (-$4,600/12×6)

    December 4, 2013 at 5:46 pm #150285
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    30 Sep 13 retained earnings were +12000
    6 monts pre acq loss was -something/2 included in 12000 so need to add them back
    This way I concuded to retained earnings 14something at the date of acq :/ :/

    December 4, 2013 at 5:47 pm #150287
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    Have got a negative goodwill of $3400.
    Pup $900
    Added contingent consideration in current liabilities

    Can any1 confirm these answers?

    December 4, 2013 at 5:47 pm #150288
    grahamdchild
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 8
    • ☆

    Shit – school boy error…..

    December 4, 2013 at 5:48 pm #150289
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 6
    • ☆

    I got my goodwill at -3700. Did anyone get that figure? I just hope for a 50 for this paper. Aiks.

    December 4, 2013 at 5:50 pm #150291
    grahamdchild
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 8
    • ☆

    Bugger you are totally right, surely that’ll only be 2 marks for getting the Goodwill wrong when everything else balanced?

    December 4, 2013 at 5:52 pm #150293
    tbm13
    Member
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 68
    • ☆☆

    @simona121:

    You mixed up Q3 and Q4. Q3 was about cashflows whereas Q4 was about qualitative characteristics and leases.

    Q4, a: there are 2 fundamental characteristics: relevance and faithful representation.

    There are 4 enhancing qualitative characteristics: comparability, verifiability, timeliness and understandability.

    I didn’t answer what the difference between fundamental and enhancing characteristics is, but I just checked my book and it says that the enhancing characteristics are implied by faithful representation.

    Q4, b, i) as you point out, this was a secured loan. I believe Q4, b, ii was an operational lease since the risk was transferred and there was no obligation to buy back the property and no incentive to do so (i.e. they would have to buy it at fair value).

    Q5 was not about EPS… 🙂 It was… again about leases.

    There was an operational lease. a) required you to explain how to account for it (in words) [4 points] and b) asked you to state quantitatively the impact on the financial statements [6 points]

    December 4, 2013 at 5:55 pm #150294
    Frank
    Member
    • Topics: 15
    • Replies: 69
    • ☆☆

    @ grahamdchild, I may be wrong but i think we had to add the PNL of $4600 to the R/E as per BS to get R/E b/f in the goodwill calc.
    my reasoning was,
    1. to get the R/E per BS at year end the PNL must have been deducted from the R/E b/f to arrive at that figure. so to get the R/E b/f i had to add it back on.

    then i also time apportioned the Loss for the year to get that pre acq loss on date of acquision.

    i may be wrong but it made though

    i had something like

    FV of SNA @DOA
    share…………………………………………………………….6000
    fv adjst. ……………………………………………………………2000
    ret.earns b/f……………………………………………………….xxxx …..( dont remember figure but R/E per BS – PNL of 4600)
    ret earns/Lossfor 6months ……………4600/2……(3200)

    something like that

    December 4, 2013 at 5:55 pm #150295
    Maria
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    was it 1.50 or 1.35 cash per share?

    December 4, 2013 at 5:56 pm #150296
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    Pup plz in q1?? And the intra group sales to be eliminated?

    December 4, 2013 at 5:56 pm #150297
    grahamdchild
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 8
    • ☆

    Frank you are totally right, it was such small oversight at my end…. so even though I balanced – I balanced with an error hopefully I won’t forfeit to many marks

    December 4, 2013 at 5:57 pm #150298
    grahamdchild
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 8
    • ☆

    Cosmic, I got my Pup to £600, and I think I removed 9K or 8K from Revenue and Cos, can’t remember

    December 4, 2013 at 5:58 pm #150299
    tbm13
    Member
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 68
    • ☆☆

    More on Q5: it was an operational lease for 20 years started 12 years ago. The tennent made substantial improvements for 7 million. And there will be costs in the future (in 8 years) to convert it back. The present value is 5 million.

    The questions asked how to treat the lease, the building works and the costs to convert back.

    In my opinion, the solution is to add 7 and 5 together (12) and charge deprecation over the remaining 8 years, i.e. 12/8 = 1.5 m per year. Then you also had to pay the operational lease (400k per year or so).

    Statement of financial position:

    assets:
    12 – 1.5 depreciation = 10.5

    I’m not sure if this is correct though…

    One thing that’s not clear to me whether the discount on the 5 m has to be unwound.

    I’m also not sure if capitalising the 5m was correct, although I believe it is. Or should it have been charged as a provision to liabilities. Hmm, yeah, maybe.

    I guess the 5m should have been a provision and it should have been increased every year by unwinding the discount. But only the 8% interest figure was given, so figuring out the discount isn’t that easy (definitely possible tho).

    December 4, 2013 at 6:00 pm #150300
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    Frank…to confirm…

    Pre acq = $14,300
    Post acq losses $2300 and had to be adjusted for the add dep and pup

    December 4, 2013 at 6:01 pm #150301
    latoyah
    Member
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 207
    • ☆☆☆

    This paper was relatively easy compared to other pass papers i have seen as this mainly calculation less commentory once you know what to go where you should pass it.

    with that said however i can say i completely failed this one! contigent asset many would say was the trick but i believe i was correct in using the 1.5 instead of the 1.8. there was a loss on the retained earnings for the year so between it and the negative goodwill i dont know. then the negative goodwill should be canceled from retained earnings the only example i did with negative good will it was deducted from operating expenses in the P& L so what did i do with it. just made a note. how does the negative good will affect the value of the NCI.
    i failed this paper miserably. i didnt time aporation the post acq ret ears. didnt share good will. if i get

    Q2 – so i know a bit about construction contract but how much did i do on the paper – (not muc)
    Income tax – it was a struggle while i was studying it but then i thought i finally got it then the examiner comes and gives it in a different way ok so maybe i could have calculated the reval surplus first then deduct the $24m i dont know or should i just say 25% of the 24m will is tax base (SEE MY PROBLEM)

    Q3 – so every question i have practiced had a increase in rec, inv and maybe payables and an increase in reval of ppe now this exam they had to come with a reduction in all areas! (HUH)

    i wont even mention 4 and 5 they are basically lease questions if you had time left from doing the three killers then you could work on those.

    December 4, 2013 at 6:03 pm #150302
    anuj428
    Member
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 30
    • ☆

    If anyone looked at technical articles, there were a few articles on leases!

    December 4, 2013 at 6:03 pm #150303
    Frank
    Member
    • Topics: 15
    • Replies: 69
    • ☆☆

    yea but that only 1 or 2 marks m8 so you can still pass, i dont remember my sofp balancing though, i think i was out by about 3570 so i left it hanging for the marker to do his/her job, got pissed…

    @Cosmic89 i think i got PuP of 600
    my profit % was 40% Gross

    so 1.5 x 40%

    also had to add back the difference in the contigent consideration to P’s earnings when working out cons R/E

    December 4, 2013 at 6:07 pm #150305
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    Thanks frank..i think got my pup wrong then since the majority saying 600 🙁
    Have added the decrease in the calculation for consolidated RE

    December 4, 2013 at 6:09 pm #150306
    tron
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    In q5 it said that the lease was an operating lease, but looking at the question to me it sounded more like a finance lease, so I said that the lease needs to be reclassified and depreciated like a finance lease

    December 4, 2013 at 6:10 pm #150307
    kutiez2005
    Participant
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 42
    • ☆

    I’m not sure but I thought the restoration costs in Q5 met the definition of a liability so put in NCL and unwound 1 years discount, added it on to the liability and charged the unwound discount to SPL.

    I found the exam quite hard, especially time wise. Like someone else said there seemed barely any time to think but I answered all questions apart from most of the rising prices bit in Q3 so lost 5 or 6 marks there. Nothing balanced but I still think (hope!) that I’ve done enough to pass.

    December 4, 2013 at 6:11 pm #150310
    wajiman
    Participant
    • Topics: 6
    • Replies: 46
    • ☆☆

    worst paper ever, guys. i could not find anything related to sale and purchase back of that laidwood (whatever) in books. i was totally blank on q5 couldnt even understand what to do, just mentioned expense the expenses thats all. :/. a negative goodwill, up till now it was only tested in P2 and examiner gave us in F7, totally screwed that part of mine. Q2. damn, where the hell did the examiner get that from :/.

    December 4, 2013 at 6:11 pm #150311
    itaijoel
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    I didnt even attempt Q4 and Q5… Wasted a lot of time on Q2

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 25 posts - 26 through 50 (of 161 total)
← 1 2 3 … 5 6 7 →
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • mm3677 on IAS 16 Accounting for a revaluation – CIMA F1 Financial Reporting
  • Anastesia123 on MA Chapter 1 Questions Accounting for Management
  • John Moffat on MA Chapter 26 Questions Variance Analysis
  • acowtant on Changes in group structure – examples – ACCA SBR lectures
  • Samantha96 on The Statement of Financial Position and Income Statement (part a) – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in