Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA TX Taxation Forums › *** F6 June 2013 Exam was… Post your comments ***
- This topic has 232 replies, 71 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- June 4, 2013 at 10:25 pm #129218
I would only love to know what is OP lecturer on F6 opinion on this exam and weather he considers it hard over all or all-right?
June 4, 2013 at 10:33 pm #129221AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 9
- ☆
<cite> @seanog91 said:</cite>
Hey, How did people find F6 Irish variant. … Anyone else think the same as me?Sean – I agree not a fair test as I focused on a lot of little bits you knew or didn’t. The core bits were less points then they should be and fairly easy. These are the bits I thought tough:
Annual Accounting Scheme
Farmer with Incoming Averaging
Corporate Tax from scratch as no net profit figure.
Nearly all the withholding rates were needed.
UK third level above threshold
Medical insurance
Legal expense on a failed M&A
VAT included RCT (ignored said was an IT credit)
VAT on own home work.Theory was easy – residency, ordinary, domicile. Timely question..
June 4, 2013 at 10:40 pm #128935<cite> @geteveryone said:</cite>
Yeah, I also got 6625 shares.2650 is just 10,600/4, so it doesn’t take into account the actual gain.
ie. Proceeds
(Cost)
_____
Gain
(AE)
_____
Chargeable.I don’t know if 6625 is right, but I used algebra to calculate the answer.
4X – 2.4X – 10600 = 0
So far, I know I mucked up the Pension Scheme portion of question 1 and I also didn’t realise Rhonda’s BSI was gross, so I wouldn’t be surprised if this was wrong – pays to read the question attentively.
<cite> @charlotteo said:</cite>
I would say yes, deduct the occupational pension contribution from his salary in the employment income working (only his contribution, not his employer’s) as this is a tax free benefit.And because his personal pension contribution was £40k, yes, you’d add a grossed up amount of £50k when extending the tax bands.
But I thought if the market value was higher than the sale we took the market value & not the actual sales proceeds?
The market value was £6.40
She sold to daughter 4.00 -irrelevant
Cost 2.4
Actual gain £4
Annual exemption £10600/ £4 gain = 2650June 4, 2013 at 10:40 pm #128951<cite> @faranjamal said:</cite>
Didn’t the question ask income tax liability and not payable/repayable?</blockquote<cite> @duffielda52 said:</cite>
For the share question did any one get 2650 shares ??Yes even I got 2650 shares . 2650 * sp 4 is 10600. So no gain/loss
June 4, 2013 at 10:40 pm #129045<cite> @oldc02 said:</cite>
Yes I put it as restricted too as all of the sale proceeds were not re-invested. I think I got a chargeable gain of £12,000 on warehouse two.Likewise.
<cite> @atab said:</cite>
But it didn’t say how many were sold….it just asked us to see how many could be sold without incurring a gain…..therefore I took the full amount plus the annual exemption and divided it by the selling price to see how many could be sold without incurring a gain….Hmm, I just read that there was mention of ‘market price’ in the question, which I apparently totally overlooked. I based my answer on the £4/share selling price. Just got to wait and see now. I’d look up the answer in my notes, but I’m busy panicking about F7.
June 4, 2013 at 10:44 pm #129234<cite>@paking said:</cite>
Sean – I agree not a fair test as I focused on a lot of little bits you knew or didn’t. The core bits were less points then they should be and fairly easy. These are the bits I thought tough:
Annual Accounting Scheme
Farmer with Incoming Averaging
Corporate Tax from scratch as no net profit figure.
Nearly all the withholding rates were needed.
UK third level above threshold
Medical insurance
Legal expense on a failed M&A
VAT included RCT (ignored said was an IT credit)
VAT on own home work.Yeah the VAT question was very unfair. The Annual Accounting Scheme wasn’t even in my text book. I thought it was something to do with filing one tax return for the year and said it was for individuals who can claim the Form13B number. As well got that wrong. The farmer average income was ok I hope. I just took 2012, 11 and 10 income and divided by 3. Please god tell me that for the corporation tax you use the trading profit. I think it was like 800000 or something and then you do your addbacks. The VAt on his own work was just charge himself VAT on the materials but not the labour but I thought the 2/3 rules for the first one was tricky enough as i was not sure if you can apply 13.5% for the whole amount or do you have to itemize? I applied the 13.5% to the whole invoice. The RCT was unfair as there is 4 different rates that can apply for RCT and revenue decide on the rate that must be used. I used 30% but still charged VAT and put the VAT amount in my summary. I agree theory was good. The CGT question for the shares was very tricky as the sale proceeds for CGT not monetary gain was 100,000 I hope ? Please tell me you agree?
Theory was easy – residency, ordinary, domicile. Timely question..
June 4, 2013 at 10:51 pm #129235Question 2 UK TAX : Capital allowance bf figures (TWDV) then had sales and cost…….did people use all the sales value? …..
and question also said the cost has previously been included (does this mean we ignore cost correct?) …..One of the sell I put into main pool and other into special.
The purchase:
One had FYA 100% the other was just main pool?
Question 2: I think there was also only two Zeros. Rest were all Disallowed including pens/customer/overseas entertain.
Please confirm someone 🙂
I can sleep better lol.
June 5, 2013 at 4:13 am #129248<cite> @vipulv said:</cite>
Question 2 UK TAX : Capital allowance bf figures (TWDV) then had sales and cost…….did people use all the sales value? …..
and question also said the cost has previously been included (does this mean we ignore cost correct?) …..One of the sell I put into main pool and other into special.
The purchase:
One had FYA 100% the other was just main pool?
Question 2: I think there was also only two Zeros. Rest were all Disallowed including pens/customer/overseas entertain.
Please confirm someone 🙂
I can sleep better lol.
The vehicles sold had to be reduced at lower of cost and selling price.
Yes, one had FYA and the oher was main pool.
Q2. I dpnt remember exactly, but yes, most were disallowed other than repainting and free advertising in charity.
June 5, 2013 at 4:15 am #129249Someone earlier mentioned about PPR for Q5.
I think it was not available as it was never occupied as his main residence and was always rented.June 5, 2013 at 5:54 am #129258AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- ☆
UK – question 4 about change of accounting periods was the worst question. Found the rest of it O.K.
June 5, 2013 at 6:13 am #129259Totally messed up in the occupational pension scheme.Didnt realise that employer’s contribution also utilises the maximum allowance!!!!!!!But thank God ACCA marks per entry and would not actually penalize the whole workings…
In relation to the share’s qsn i presume it was a gift btn connected persons,so i took the open market value i.e 6.4x-2.4x =10600 and got 2650 shares…..hop it pays.
June 5, 2013 at 6:57 am #129263<cite> @faranjamal said:</cite>
On the cover page of the answer booklet, you have to mark the questions you attempted; I forgot to do that! Will that make any difference?I did the same on Monday and phoned ACCA and they assured me that the examiners manually check if computer cant read marks or in my case I marked two question numbers at top of page as I made mistake initially and wanted to make sure I drew attention to it by marking another question.
June 5, 2013 at 7:52 am #129278was under pressure, due to lack of time.
June 5, 2013 at 8:06 am #129282AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 42
- ☆
Where are people getting PPR from? The question only said sold an asset for 520000 i think and had some legal costs associated with it, that was all.
Rental income only income for the income tax comp which was about 16k???
which left 17350 for 18% gain and the 520 capital gain – what was unused of the 18% band at 28%
June 5, 2013 at 8:25 am #129284<cite> @kased58 said:</cite>
Totally messed up in the occupational pension scheme.Didnt realise that employer’s contribution also utilises the maximum allowance!!!!!!!But thank God ACCA marks per entry and would not actually penalize the whole workings…In relation to the share’s qsn i presume it was a gift btn connected persons,so i took the open market value i.e 6.4x-2.4x =10600 and got 2650 shares…..hop it pays.
Yeah, it was a technical gift, but they both elected for rollover relief, so the excess (6.4-4.0) wasn’t immediately chargeable in the 12/13 tax year.
June 5, 2013 at 9:08 am #129303AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
That is true. Hence the maximum contribution to the personal pension scheme is 40K so as to avoid any annual charge.
Workings:
Max contribution for 2012/13 50K
Utilised in 2012/13 (28K+12K) 40K
Untilised in 2012/13 50K-40K= 10KThis same contribution has been done for the past 5 years. Any untilised contribution from the previous 3 years can be brought forward to 2012/13.
Hence,
Utilised in 2009/10 10K
Utilised in 2010/11 10K
Utilised in 2011/12 10KPlus the utilised for 2012/13 10K
This sum up to 40K (being the maximum contribution to the personal contribution.
NB. You’ll only extend the tax band rate by this 40K.June 5, 2013 at 9:28 am #129305AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
For question 3 (a) Determining the number of shares to give to the son.
The MV of the share price is 6.4. For the CGT purpose, it would be charged using the market value since the transaction was between two connected people (dependent). Hence there would be hold over relief.
But the shares would be sold to the son at the price of 4 with actual cost of the share of price being 2.4.
Hence should the shares be sold at this price (i.e. 4), there would be a chargeable gain of 1.6. Hence not all of the amount would be held over. Below is the workings;MV of share 6.4
Cost (2.8)
Hold over relief (6.4-2.8-1.6) (2)
Chargeable Gain 1.6Hence to avoid paying for any CGT, the number of shares to sell to the son should be the margin value of chargeable gain(i.e. 1.6) times the number of shares = 10600 (the annual exemption)
Mathematically,
=10600/1.6
=6625 sharesJune 5, 2013 at 9:57 am #129312<cite> @duffielda52 said:</cite>
But I thought if the market value was higher than the sale we took the market value & not the actual sales proceeds?The market value was £6.40
She sold to daughter 4.00 -irrelevant
Cost 2.4
Actual gain £4
Annual exemption £10600/ £4 gain = 2650Yes, but you’re missing the part of the question where it specifically said that parent and child both elected to defer rollover gain as much as possible. So you do take the market value as deemed proceeds, but the chargable gain is worked out by deducting actual original cost from actual sales price. The rollover amount is then the balancing figure. So, as I and several other people have already said, the calculation would be:
Market Value…………… £6.40
Cost………………………..(£2.40) (the amount it cost the parent originally)
Rollover relief…………..(£2.40) (this is the last figure that is calculated, after working out the amount chargable now, below)
Gain………………………..£1.60 (this is worked out before the relief above, and is actual proceeds (£4) less actual cost (£2.40)Now that you know the gain per share is £1.60, it’s a simple calculation of the annual exemption divided by the fain: £10,600 / £1.60 = 6625
June 5, 2013 at 10:02 am #129313<cite>@joskof01 said:</cite>
That is true. Hence the maximum contribution to the personal pension scheme is 40K so as to avoid any annual charge.
Workings:
Max contribution for 2012/13 50K
Utilised in 2012/13 (28K+12K) 40K
Untilised in 2012/13 50K-40K= 10KThis same contribution has been done for the past 5 years. Any untilised contribution from the previous 3 years can be brought forward to 2012/13.
Hence,
Utilised in 2009/10 10K
Utilised in 2010/11 10K
Utilised in 2011/12 10KPlus the utilised for 2012/13 10K
This sum up to 40K (being the maximum contribution to the personal contribution.
NB. You’ll only extend the tax band rate by this 40K.“NB. You’ll only extend the tax band rate by this 40K”
….By this £40k grossed up, ie £40k x 100/80 = £50k.
June 5, 2013 at 10:18 am #129315Uk varient can any tel me that what is blunder…….
June 5, 2013 at 10:20 am #129316I wrote property conditions
instead of avantages is it blunder………….?June 5, 2013 at 12:33 pm #129338Can someone please tell me the answer to this. I rang ACCA about it and they didnt know. Say in income tax we are asked to work out part A and then use part A answer in part B. When we get penalised in Part A for the mistake, does this mean we can not get full marks in part B because we are basing our assumption that part A is correct and we have been penalised already or are we penalised in part B again?
June 5, 2013 at 1:24 pm #129343it was not difficult one but i stuck i accouting date changing and some of losses
June 5, 2013 at 7:27 pm #129553I am a bit of worry about the 1st question it was too much tricky….. have not done that type of question before
June 5, 2013 at 8:15 pm #129563Re the shares Charlotte is right, you can’t roll over the excess of proceeds less original cost so the fact that the daughter paid £4 was relevant.
Re pension, the BR band is extended by the GROSS personal pension contr so £50k. The HR band was extended by the same but he earned under this so there was no tax at the HR.
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘*** F6 June 2013 Exam was… Post your comments ***’ is closed to new replies.