• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

*** F6 June 2013 Exam was… Post your comments ***

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA TX Taxation Forums › *** F6 June 2013 Exam was… Post your comments ***

  • This topic has 232 replies, 71 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by Anonymous.
Viewing 25 posts - 76 through 100 (of 233 total)
← 1 2 3 4 5 … 8 9 10 →
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 4, 2013 at 4:23 pm #129017
    oldc02
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆

    <cite> @mahoysam said:</cite>
    I am hundred percent sure that NRBs are used on PETs!

    Yes I used the nil rate band for the death tax calculation of £325,000 but didn’t use it in the lifetime question i.e the nil rate band given in the question for the 2008/09 tax year.

    June 4, 2013 at 4:23 pm #129018
    atab
    Member
    • Topics: 82
    • Replies: 185
    • ☆☆☆

    <cite> @confused1 said:</cite>
    That’s exactly what I got. Hope it right!!

    Hope so!!

    June 4, 2013 at 4:26 pm #129019
    dannyw1984
    Member
    • Topics: 14
    • Replies: 78
    • ☆☆

    <cite> @oldc02 said:</cite>
    Confused – no I didn’t use it as it was a PET. I did at first and then realised it was wrong.

    erm, i used the NIL rate of £300,000 on the PET, which meant there was only £25,000 to use against the estate later (£325,000 less the £300,000 already used).

    Is that completely wrong? 🙁

    June 4, 2013 at 4:26 pm #129020
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 42
    • ☆

    It wasn’t a bad paper at all – except as always question 4 with change in accounting period. I thought the only mileage that was allowable was between his place of work and clients visits and everything else was disallowed? I got 708 I think plus I think the amount you could extend his BRB were the gross amounts of personal pension contributions of 50000 which the question specifically said he maxed out on and did so for his previous years so I assumed no brought forward figures and extended the bands by 50K.

    Perhaps it was yet another example of the examiner trying to trip us up as usual? Did everyone include the overseas company in their associations also as I feel I was being a bit thick in places and forgot to include it in somewhere.

    What was Question 4b about? All you had to do was split the accounting periods? And Part 2 on 5? Had to do chargeable gains and income tax for 7 marks?? Talk about time pressure???

    June 4, 2013 at 4:26 pm #129021
    mahoysam
    Participant
    • Topics: 37
    • Replies: 140
    • ☆☆

    <cite> @oldc02 said:</cite>
    Yes I used the nil rate band for the death tax calculation of £325,000 but didn’t use it in the lifetime question i.e the nil rate band given in the question for the 2008/09 tax year.

    Dear, I cannot remember the numbers but NRBs are utilised in a chronological order, therefore, we should use it first on the PETs then if there is anything remaining we use it on the estate, in the question, there was nothing remaining for the estate…

    Anyways, there is no use of argument now, best of luck, I hope we all pass 🙂

    June 4, 2013 at 4:27 pm #129022
    dannyw1984
    Member
    • Topics: 14
    • Replies: 78
    • ☆☆

    also, i took off the £3000 annual exemption for both years and took away £5000 as it was a gift for his sons wedding

    June 4, 2013 at 4:28 pm #129023
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 42
    • ☆

    Yup the NRB was supposed to 325000 as it was when the guy died. You’d only use the 300000 when he was alive and when he makes donations into a trust (comp 1)

    June 4, 2013 at 4:28 pm #129024
    mahoysam
    Participant
    • Topics: 37
    • Replies: 140
    • ☆☆

    <cite> @dannyw1984 said:</cite>
    also, i took off the £3000 annual exemption for both years and took away £5000 as it was a gift for his sons wedding

    correct 🙂

    June 4, 2013 at 4:29 pm #129025
    Abbi
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    <cite> @charlotteo said:</cite>
    I think: when you calculate a gain involving subject matter that was sold at a below market value – as was the case here – you take market value as the deemed proceeds. So for 1 share:

    Deemed proceeds £4
    Cost <u>(£2.40)</u>
    <b>Gain to tax now £1.60</B>

    £10,600 / £1.60 = 6625 shares

    I agree with your workings but wasn’t the market value £6.40 the cost £2.40 (she sold to her daughter for £4 which is irrelevant. ) Leaving a gain of £4 per share. 10600/4 = 2560??

    June 4, 2013 at 4:29 pm #129026
    atab
    Member
    • Topics: 82
    • Replies: 185
    • ☆☆☆

    <cite> @oldc02 said:</cite>
    vipulv – no not a stupid question at all – the amount of output vat was states and yes I included £50 of output vat for the fuel scale charge (£300/6) and also excluded the sale to be w/off as 6 months hadn’t passed. Not sure if I’m right or not.

    Yes you’re right to include the sales proceeds on disposal but for motor car 3 i used the cost as the disposal proceeds rather than the sale proceeds as the sales proceeds were more than the cost. Again not sure if that’s right.

    Re: Q1 I also added back the mileage to and from work @ 60p as this is disallowable, I think I got £708

    6 months did pass…..the receivable was due mid september…..it was written off end of March….that is 6 and a half months

    June 4, 2013 at 4:30 pm #129027
    dannyw1984
    Member
    • Topics: 14
    • Replies: 78
    • ☆☆

    <cite>@danf1981 said:</cite>
    It wasn’t a bad paper at all – except as always question 4 with change in accounting period. I thought the only mileage that was allowable was between his place of work and clients visits and everything else was disallowed? I got 708 I think plus I think the amount you could extend his BRB were the gross amounts of personal pension contributions of 50000 which the question specifically said he maxed out on and did so for his previous years so I assumed no brought forward figures and extended the bands by 50K.

    Perhaps it was yet another example of the examiner trying to trip us up as usual? Did everyone include the overseas company in their associations also as I feel I was being a bit thick in places and forgot to include it in somewhere.

    What was Question 4b about? All you had to do was split the accounting periods? And Part 2 on 5? Had to do chargeable gains and income tax for 7 marks?? Talk about time pressure???

    there was only one company i didn’t include as an associate as it was under a 50% shareholding?

    therefore the upper limit and lower limit for marginal gains were reduced to £1,500,000/4 and £300,000/4.

    June 4, 2013 at 4:30 pm #129028
    oldc02
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆

    <cite>@danf1981 said:</cite>
    Yup the NRB was supposed to 325000 as it was when the guy died. You’d only use the 300000 when he was alive and when he makes donations into a trust (comp 1)

    Yes this is exactly what I did

    June 4, 2013 at 4:31 pm #129029
    mahoysam
    Participant
    • Topics: 37
    • Replies: 140
    • ☆☆

    Sorry guys, I am NOT reading anymore comments… I think I have done well, but the comments here confuse me lol

    Plus… whoever has F4 exam coming up, better stop talking about the past and focus on the coming exams! Best of luck to everyone 🙂

    June 4, 2013 at 4:32 pm #129030
    oldc02
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆

    <cite> @atab said:</cite>
    6 months did pass…..the receivable was due mid september…..it was written off end of March….that is 6 and a half months

    I wasn’t sure as I wasn’t sure if it was from the date of the invoice Sep or the date the payment was due Oct. Knew I’d get it the wrong way around. Thanks

    June 4, 2013 at 4:32 pm #129032
    Faran
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆

    The nil rate band given in the question was irrelevant as it was a PET (Potentially EXEMPT Transfer)
    It is only relevanf for CLTs because they are chargeable when gifted.

    In the VAT Private Fuel, the full 300 was deductible, right? (as it was already scaled for the quarter)

    June 4, 2013 at 4:33 pm #129033
    atab
    Member
    • Topics: 82
    • Replies: 185
    • ☆☆☆

    <cite> @mahoysam said:</cite>
    The fist warehouse did not get a rollover relief because the reinvestment proceeds were way lower than the s.p. and the second one got a full rollover relief so the tax was nil.

    How did the second one get full rollover relief? Isn’t is restricted to the difference between proceeds and amount reinvested?

    June 4, 2013 at 4:33 pm #129034
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 42
    • ☆

    I got this

    MV at date of disposal 10000 x 6.4 64000
    Cost to whoever 10000 x 2.4 24000
    gAins 40000
    less AE 10600
    Chargeable 24400

    24400 divided by 4 = 6100

    June 4, 2013 at 4:34 pm #129036
    mahoysam
    Participant
    • Topics: 37
    • Replies: 140
    • ☆☆

    <cite> @atab said:</cite>
    How did the second one get full rollover relief? Isn’t is restricted to the difference between proceeds and amount reinvested?

    Yup and the amount invested was higher than the s.p.

    June 4, 2013 at 4:34 pm #129038
    Charlotte
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 14
    • ☆

    <cite> @duffielda52 said:</cite>
    I agree with your workings but wasn’t the market value £6.40 the cost £2.40 (she sold to her daughter for £4 which is irrelevant. ) Leaving a gain of £4 per share. 10600/4 = 2560??

    That makes sense – I thought there was gift relief but didn’t remember that the market value was £6.40.

    Therefore:

    Deemed Proceeds £6.40 (market value)
    Cost (£2.40)
    Gift Relief (£2.40)
    Gain to tax now £1.60 (£4 actual proceeds less £2.40 cost)

    June 4, 2013 at 4:35 pm #129039
    oldc02
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆

    <cite> @atab said:</cite>
    How did the second one get full rollover relief? Isn’t is restricted to the difference between proceeds and amount reinvested?

    Yes I put it as restricted too as all of the sale proceeds were not re-invested. I think I got a chargeable gain of £12,000 on warehouse two.

    June 4, 2013 at 4:35 pm #129040
    confused1
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    I did a question twice giving two different answers cuz I wasn’t sure which method to use for the company one. Will I get penalised for it?

    June 4, 2013 at 4:35 pm #129041
    armaghanbutt
    Member
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 39
    • ☆☆

    <cite>@leannegina said:</cite>
    for malaysia variant, it was kinda straight forward. hope can score well

    u remmember your any answers ? my paper was not good i didn t what to do in q3 iba …. RPGT gain WAS 144000?

    June 4, 2013 at 4:36 pm #129042
    atab
    Member
    • Topics: 82
    • Replies: 185
    • ☆☆☆

    <cite> @geteveryone said:</cite>
    The cost isn’t 24,000 though, it’s 2.4 X No. of shares sold.

    The cost would only be 24,000 had all 10,000 shares been sold.

    But it didn’t say how many were sold….it just asked us to see how many could be sold without incurring a gain…..therefore I took the full amount plus the annual exemption and divided it by the selling price to see how many could be sold without incurring a gain….

    June 4, 2013 at 4:36 pm #129043
    Charlotte
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 14
    • ☆

    <cite> @faranjamal said:</cite>
    The nil rate band given in the question was irrelevant as it was a PET (Potentially EXEMPT Transfer)
    It is only relevanf for CLTs because they are chargeable when gifted.

    In the VAT Private Fuel, the full 300 was deductible, right? (as it was already scaled for the quarter)

    No, the scale charge for the ¼ was inclusive of VAT. Therefore the £50 VAT element was to be added to the output VAT only, I thought?

    June 4, 2013 at 4:37 pm #129044
    masquez
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    it was kind of tight but i still keep my head up for that PASS.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 25 posts - 76 through 100 (of 233 total)
← 1 2 3 4 5 … 8 9 10 →
  • The topic ‘*** F6 June 2013 Exam was… Post your comments ***’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Starmoon123 on Strategy formulation (Part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • nosiphoceliwedlamini@gmail.com on Revenue – Example 5 (profitable contracts) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • amaanalli on Fraud, bribery, whistle-blowing and company ethics – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • verweijlisa on Group SPL – Group profit on disposal – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • verweijlisa on Group SPL – Group profit on disposal – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in