Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA TX Taxation Forums › *** F6 June 2012 Exam was… Comments and Instant Poll ***
- This topic has 110 replies, 40 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- June 12, 2012 at 7:58 pm #100184AnonymousInactive
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 21
- ☆
i-acca said 15 minutes ago:
Okay how about chargable gain question first part one was stating resident and ordinary resident in uk and second one was the corporation
With the painting, i deduct the allowance of 10.600 then the calculate gain
Second one only warehouse and freeoffice building calculated gainThird part only freeoffice building was available to ER relief with the 10 %
Next part i did without a rollover simply deduct costs and calculated the indexation cost and deduct it
_______________________________________________________________
This was the correct approach , don`t forget the one that did not qualify for ER you had to work out how much to tax at 18 % and and 28% considering the salaryJune 12, 2012 at 8:00 pm #100185Flat rate is NOT beneficial. The flat rate % is based on the GROSS turnover. This is the amount payable to HMRC. When you net off Input and Out put VAT, remember the figures included VAT! then this gave a lower tax payable!
June 12, 2012 at 8:03 pm #100186AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 21
- ☆
jamesmichaeltucker said 1 minute ago:
Flat rate is NOT beneficial. The flat rate % is based on the GROSS turnover. This is the amount payable to HMRC. When you net off Input and Out put VAT, remember the figures included VAT! then this gave a lower tax payable!.
Yep : That is correctJune 12, 2012 at 8:06 pm #100187@artursaliasi said:
jamesmichaeltucker said 1 minute ago:
Flat rate is NOT beneficial. The flat rate % is based on the GROSS turnover. This is the amount payable to HMRC. When you net off Input and Out put VAT, remember the figures included VAT! then this gave a lower tax payable!.
Yep : That is correctI reached that conclusion too.
June 12, 2012 at 8:06 pm #100188This was much better than F5…though the lingering effects of frustration went into the exam with me…silly mistakes and all aside…it’s a pass for me 🙂 cause most marks are for formatting/workings not answer per se.
One thing…how do examiners expect us to be able to write so much for 3hrs back-to-back??? Writing hand started to get really tired in the exam and had to mentally PUSH myself to bear the pain and write…hope all was legible enuff! 🙂
Time for results now!
Thanks OT for all the help with F5&6 🙂June 12, 2012 at 8:09 pm #100189@triniaccountant said:
This was much better than F5…though the lingering effects of frustration went into the exam with me…silly mistakes and all aside…it’s a pass for me 🙂 cause most marks are for formatting/workings not answer per se.One thing…how do examiners expect us to be able to write so much for 3hrs back-to-back??? Writing hand started to get really tired in the exam and had to mentally PUSH myself to bear the pain and write…hope all was legible enuff! 🙂
Time for results now!
Thanks OT for all the help with F5&6 🙂I agree, I noticed a blister appearing on my index finger for writing so much!
June 12, 2012 at 8:26 pm #100190AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 21
- ☆
How did you tackle the furnished living accommodation on employment section?
benefit arising due to expensive accommodation (MV – £75,000) x 4%.What about the furnitures supplied by the employer I think was approx 9K ? did any apply 20% to it? and on partnership his partner had an expensive car and he he was using for private journey and you had time apportion @ 10% to work out the capital allowance ?
June 12, 2012 at 8:30 pm #100191@artursaliasi said:
How did you tackle the furnished living accommodation on employment section?
benefit arising due to expensive accommodation (MV – £75,000) x 4%.What about the furnitures supplied by the employer I think was approx 9K ? did any apply 20% to it? and on partnership his partner had an expensive car and he he was using for private journey and you had time apportion @ 10% to work out the capital allowance ?
I calculated the accommodation by the same method as you I think. Annual value, + (MV – £75,000) x 4%. I assumed it was the MV, because the property was acquired more than 6 years before being provided to employee (if I remembered that rule correctly).
June 12, 2012 at 8:31 pm #100192AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- ☆
Paper was damn easy.. Expecting above 75!
June 12, 2012 at 8:35 pm #100193AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 21
- ☆
How did you tackle the furnished living accommodation on employment section?
benefit arising due to expensive accommodation (MV – £75,000) x 4%.What about the furnitures supplied by the employer I think was approx 9K ? did any apply 20% to it? and on partnership his partner had an expensive car and he he was using for private journey and you had time apportion @ 10% to work out the capital allowance ?
I calculated the accommodation by the same method as you I think. Annual value, + (MV – £75,000) x 4%. I assumed it was the MV, because the property was acquired more than 6 years before being provided to employee (if I remembered that rule correctly).
____________________________
Off Course the annual value as well , but what about the furniture ?June 12, 2012 at 8:51 pm #100194I thought it was the adding value so i add to cost of the property? Not a benefit for the employer? Unless if i read it correctly
June 12, 2012 at 9:12 pm #100195No there was the property’s annual value (which I now remember I didn’t include 🙁 ) then you add the MV (after 6yrs owned) -£75k) x4% (which I messed up n used 20%) <---That's additional benefit; then you add the 10% Furniture Benefit (cause that's the rate the employer gets it at)? Correct me if I'm wrong 🙁 TriniA
June 12, 2012 at 9:20 pm #100196AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 21
- ☆
Certainly including furniture made the question a bit spicy, it was the tricky, how do you classify this as an asset that was certainly adding value to the accommodation makes sense or does this qualify as an asset used by the employee as a benefit and apply 20% to it ?
June 12, 2012 at 9:44 pm #100197Well certainly dint remember i understand that wasvthe adding value to the property but i may have been mistaken as the exam was veeery long but if it is the case that was a furniture than it is a benefit to employee and should have been add 20 % of it. I guess i lost a mark there :(((
June 12, 2012 at 10:20 pm #100198AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 6
- ☆
i did 20% on the furnishings
June 12, 2012 at 10:24 pm #100199AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 6
- ☆
is terminal loss relief only on trading profits?
June 12, 2012 at 10:48 pm #100200AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 21
- ☆
it depends , you can go back up to 3 years against total taxable profit and you can only carry forward against the trading profit
June 12, 2012 at 10:49 pm #100201AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 21
- ☆
I meant against future trading profit
June 13, 2012 at 5:23 am #100202any body know whether 220000 gift was given before march 2011 or after it.it is confirm that it is in 2011 but i want to know the date
June 13, 2012 at 6:09 am #100203can any one plz tell me that Q.1 employment income? did he left the employment? i mean? did i made a mistake in reading question properly??? i thought he was employed through out the year so i took whole year salary!
June 13, 2012 at 7:57 am #100204I thought about it and was not 100% sure myself, in previous questions the examiner didnt use the word ‘annual’ for the salary. Its was more like ‘recieved x salary’ or something like that.
June 13, 2012 at 8:19 am #100205I did 9 months salary on employment. But I don;t know…….as the question was not clear whether he left employment and went on to partnership….
Also regarding National insurance what did people write??
I wrote
Employee pays national insurance class 1
Employer class 1Athen in partnership are they not self employed so pay class 2 and 4?
June 13, 2012 at 8:22 am #100206@vipulv said:
I did 9 months salary on employment. But I don;t know…….as the question was not clear whether he left employment and went on to partnership….Also regarding National insurance what did people write??
I wrote
Employee pays national insurance class 1
Employer class 1Athen in partnership are they not self employed so pay class 2 and 4?
Regarding national insurance, that’s what I wrote too, with the addition of class 1 employer
June 13, 2012 at 8:46 am #100207it was a long exam and vey tricky – silly errors..will definetly count down the marks
June 13, 2012 at 8:47 am #100208q5 – should have been 325*70% – husband’s nil band and her nil band is reduced due to PET did 1 year before death..tricky one !!!
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.