Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA TX Taxation Forums › *** F6 December 2012 Exam *** Instant Poll and comments***
- This topic has 88 replies, 35 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by arvin1.
- AuthorPosts
- December 4, 2012 at 6:14 pm #110073
Unsure about Q1 and 2 and left IHT too π i hope things go well.
December 4, 2012 at 6:19 pm #110074AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 9
- β
@kirinski said:
I don’t understand why you are referring to investment property – this is not a question on roll-over relief for eligible business assets.
This is a question which tests the partial disposal rules – whereas the insurance proceeds are deemed to be “sale proceeds”, and then only the portion of insurance money which is re-invested can be rolled over, whereas any cash not invested is immediately chargeable. Well – this is just my opinionI got the same as you
December 4, 2012 at 6:20 pm #110075Q5 part b was (10600-4000), Was there any fuel benefit in question 1? Q2 Tax was at 26% and limits divided by 2 ( subsidiary). Q4 a- In both situations net incoming cash was less then actual cash received if she had continued self employment, Q1 Salary for 8 months and profit of 3 months in total (1month first year and whole second period profit). Basic limit was extended but no Personal allowance. Gain arising on goodwill was nil π thats what i did.
December 4, 2012 at 6:23 pm #110076im going to stop reading now.
just when i think i might have picked up a few marks (like with the subsidiary making the corp limit divide by 2) i read that i didn’t time aportion the car benefit – fucking idiot lol
December 4, 2012 at 6:23 pm #110077Q1:
FHL made a loss: needs to be carried forward; cannot be offset against gain of Property Two.
Car benefit: I think CO2 was 147 or 148, so round down to 145, then (145-125)/5 = 4 + 15 (base figure) + 3 (diesel) = 22%
Building society interest had to be grossed up (*100/80), dividends as well (*100/90). Prize from premium bond is not taxable.
Self-employment: added together gain from both periods, subtract overlap profit and subtract capital allowance.
Employment: the figure given was per month, so multiply by 8.
Q2: I found this hard since I wasn’t sure whether I should start with Trade Profit before Taxation or with Total Profit.
Q3: Set up 1985 share pool: bonus issue is not an indexation event; rights issue is; perform indexation again before they sell shares.
Land: use calculation for part disposal. I believe the work done counted as “extension”.
Property destroyed by fire: I calculated roll over relief: I think I came up with a chargeable gain of 16,600 since this was the amount not rolled over. But someone earlier in this thread said that an investment property was bought, so roll over relief would not be available. I cannot remember the wording of the question. Does anyone remember if roll over relief was available or not?
Q4: you had to calculate corporate tax, NIC and income tax for both scenarios: Scenario 1 (director is paid): calculate NIC 1 primary, income tax, and add the NIC 1 secondary they subtracted already; no corporate tax. Scenario 2: corporate tax (80000 * 20% = 16000) and then tax on dividends. 10% on first 35000, then 32.5% on the rest. Then compare total tax with the figure they gave you for self-employment: if your figure is higher, there is no tax advantage. Scenario 1 is definitely worse than self-employment. Scenario 2 was slightly worse than self-employment for me but it seems I made a mistake somewhere since other people said there was a tax advantage.
Q4, b (or was this Q3, b?): there was something about incorporation relief. 150,000 good will (cost: nil). The first part was getting 150,000 in shares. This leads to no chargeable gain since everything is incorporated. The alternative was 100,000 as stocks and 50,00 as cash: the gain attracting incorporation relief was: 100,000 / (100,000 + 50,000) * 150,000 = 100,000. 150,000 – 100,000 = 50,000 becomes chargeable. But there were 39,400 losses: so 50,000 minus 39,400 = 10,600. Minus annual allowance of 10,600 means no taxable gain.
Q5, a: pension: 133,000 could be paid into the pension
Q5, b: Look up ISA limit, subtract what he paid already and this is the figure he can pay into the ISA. (It would be wrong to use half the ISA limit! This is what you would’ve had to calculate if he had paid into a stock ISA and wanted to pay into a cash ISA)
Q5, c: Gift 200,000 to daughter: minus 6000 (annual exemption for two years): 194,000 becomes a PET.
Donation to trust: 450000 minus 3000 (annual exemption): first 325000 nil since PET is not considered. This leaves us with 120,000. 120,000 * 20% = 24,400 GBP. Or if Tim pays: 120,000 * 20 / 80 = 30,500 GBP. Total consideration: 447,000 plus 30,500 = 477,500.
IHT: PET becomes chargeable. 194,000 within nil rate. 325,000 – 194,000 = 131,000 left in nil band. 477,500 – 131,000 = 316500 needs to be taxed. 316500 * 40% = 126,600 minus taper relief 4-5 years (40%) 50,640 and minus the 30,500 paid already.
Does anyone know when ACCA will make the December F6 paper available on their web site along with the correct answers?
December 4, 2012 at 6:31 pm #110078AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 65
- ββ
So I’m 105% sure I made some silly mistakes, how much marks do I lose if my final answer is wrong but my methodology is correct? (for instance adding something even though its listed to be subtracted in my workings?)
December 4, 2012 at 6:32 pm #110079@tbm13 we have done quite same thing in exam π but in Q4 there was corporation tax in both conditions 1 and 2. π other than that i agree that there was no tax being saved as net cash incoming was less in both conditions as compared to Self-employment.
December 4, 2012 at 6:34 pm #110081@umerkhayam I thought there was no corporation tax in condition 1 since the company made zero profit: everything was spent on NIC 1 secondary and salary. Do you disagree?
December 4, 2012 at 6:35 pm #110082@angleo86 said:
So I’m 105% sure I made some silly mistakes, how much marks do I lose if my final answer is wrong but my methodology is correct? (for instance adding something even though its listed to be subtracted in my workings?)Check marking scheme in exam kit or past papers but i think you’d get marks for correct percentages used as per taxation rules and limits on your calculated income. In case your income figure is wrong you wont loose that much marks.
December 4, 2012 at 6:38 pm #110083@tbm13 said:
@umerkhayam I thought there was no corporation tax in condition 1 since the company made zero profit: everything was spent on NIC 1 secondary and salary. Do you disagree?I am unsure about it but my corporation tax liability was something like 3000
December 4, 2012 at 6:44 pm #110084AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 5
- β
for q4 part a, we have to first calculate the revised summary regarding income tax, nic and corporate tax for 2 given scenarios and then compare them seperately with the above scenario in order to findout the savings which sophia gained by opting the given scenarios , and then discuss them seperately
December 4, 2012 at 7:34 pm #110085Damn I forgot about the taper relief!!!!! Hw many marks do you think that cost me?
December 4, 2012 at 7:48 pm #110086AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 3
- β
The comments are interesting!…I made some silly mistakes as well…hoping for the best…..its so much to do in so little time…u have to think on ur feet……and then u panic when u realise u r running outta time…hope i can put this paper behind me!….what was going on in question 4 though with the NIC?
December 4, 2012 at 9:12 pm #110087AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 20
- β
For Q1: Income Tax Liability for 2011-12 came to 36,200 in my calculations.
Long period of trading accounts (“anything yet untaxed”) 14M less capital allowances (no AIA no WDA in the last period of trading), less overlap profits.Property income from property 2 (FHL loss not off-settable, so carry forward)
Exempt premium bond.
Employment income: salary * 8M, loan 7M, car benefir 6M (22% as diesel plus extra % for emissions), moving house – tax on extra benefit over 8K limit, free meals exempt, interest grossed up, dividend grossed up, premium bonds exempt.No PA, basic and higher rate bands extended by 5,500 (4,400 gift aid grossed up).
The result: income tax liability 36,200
(balancing payments required: 36,200 – 34 something already paid = so payable tax was something like 3K or so, can’t remember precisely)
Payments on acct needed: 31 Jan 13 – 18,100; 31 July 2013 – 18,100 (50% of tax payable)Anyone else got 36,200 as tax liability for Q1?
December 4, 2012 at 9:21 pm #110088AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 20
- β
Q2, Corporation tax: I struggled a bit with the Interest Income: there was a strange presentation of this. Anyone remembers what they got? – I did this way: amount actually received (which was used by Clueless in the calculations on the Computation) less accrual at 01 April 2011 plus accrual at 31 March 2012 – so it was in fact a slightly different number from the one Clueless used.
I got corporation tax payable at something like 95K, or may be 97K. Anyone remembers what they got as the final answer?
(marginal company, 26% less marginal relief, the TTP was after the deduction of 900 gift aid (but which was previously added back when calculating trading profit)
December 4, 2012 at 9:27 pm #110089AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 20
- β
@tbm 13:
When insurance proceeds are received, it is irrelevant whether it’s investment asset or not which is being replaced. It could have easily been a painting or antique necklace or a persian carpet. I feel quite strongly about this one π
December 4, 2012 at 9:45 pm #110090AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- β
kirinski said 8 minutes ago:
@tbm 13:When insurance proceeds are received, it is irrelevant whether itβs investment asset or not which is being replaced. It could have easily been a painting or antique necklace or a persian carpet. I feel quite strongly about this one
If an assets is lost or destroyed then the receipt of the insurance proceeds is treated as a normal disposal. Rollover relief is available if the insurance monies are used to purchase a replacement asset within a period of 12 months.
In the exam, the insurance proceeds was not fully invested and it has to be taxed as a chargeable gain.December 5, 2012 at 4:31 am #110091q4 was horrible i didnt even attempt. i ws running out of time so i thought better concentrate on other qus.
December 5, 2012 at 4:33 am #110092and after giving paper my friend telling if u don;t attempt any qus u will b failed if u have done good enough in other qus also. is it true ?
December 5, 2012 at 7:13 am #110093AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 15
- β
@mohammadbangash said:
and after giving paper my friend telling if u don;t attempt any qus u will b failed if u have done good enough in other qus also. is it true ?it’s not true as I know
December 5, 2012 at 9:08 am #110094@admin thank you for giving such right tips π i relied a bit on them and you got it right in f6, Thumbs up π
December 5, 2012 at 9:27 am #110095^ plz someone confirm
December 5, 2012 at 9:44 am #110096@mohammadbangash said:
^ plz someone confirmNo there’s nothing like that. you’d be assesed on the questions you’ve attempted so leaving the question doesen’t matters at all.
December 5, 2012 at 9:57 am #110097there was a small part in question 2, something related to preparing accounts in ‘iXBRL’ format? i never heard of iXBRL thing what is it?
December 5, 2012 at 10:10 am #110098AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 15
- β
@captmario said:
there was a small part in question 2, something related to preparing accounts in ‘iXBRL’ format? i never heard of iXBRL thing what is it?FA2011:
Corporation tax online filing and iXBRL tagging
All limited companies must now file their self assessment corporation tax returns
online and pay any corporation tax that is due electronically. There are no changes to the existing deadlines for doing this. A return must still include a self assessment of
the amount of corporation tax payable, although if filing is done using the software
provided by HM Revenue and Customs the amount payable is calculated as part of the
filing process.
Along with the tax return, limited companies must also submit supporting tax
computations and a copy of their accounts to HM Revenue and Customs. These must
be submitted online using inline eXtensible Business Reporting Language (iXBRL).
This is a standard for reporting business information in an electronic format using
tags that can be read by computers. Small companies with simple accounts can use
the software provided by HM Revenue and Customs, and this will automatically
produce accounts and tax computations in the correct format. Other companies can use:
β’ Other software that automatically produces iXBRL accounts and computations.
β’ A tagging service which will apply the appropriate tags to accounts and
computations.
β’ Software that enables the appropriate tags to be added to accounts and
computations.
The tags used are contained in dictionaries known as taxonomies, with different
taxonomies for different purposes. The tagging of tax computations is based on the corporation tax computational taxonomy, which includes over 1,200 relevant tags.
These changes apply where a return is filed after 1 April 2011 in respect of an
accounting period ending after 31 March 2010. - AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘*** F6 December 2012 Exam *** Instant Poll and comments***’ is closed to new replies.