Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA PM Performance Management Forums › *** F5 June 2011 Exam was … Post your comments here and vote in Instant Poll ***
- This topic has 291 replies, 186 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by zaantjie.
- AuthorPosts
- June 13, 2011 at 2:13 pm #84660
Does somebody remember the marks for each point?
June 13, 2011 at 2:13 pm #84661AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- ☆
one of the most difficult exam of life…….it was like a nightmare ….
June 13, 2011 at 2:15 pm #84662AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- ☆
@louisewareing said:
really difficult… i just know i have failed this one 🙁@cassiopeia said:
Question 5 (b) & (c) was hard for me (didn’t revise throughput that well, just learnt formulas)Otherwise, the paper was OK. Hopefully, will get 50+
June 13, 2011 at 2:24 pm #84663AnonymousInactive- Topics: 23
- Replies: 68
- ☆☆
June 13, 2011 at 2:36 pm #84664AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 6
- ☆
If any one found this exam easy I think they are supper clever I found it was really hard only one 2 questions they give you information to work with . question 1 they hardly give you any information but maybe I’m stupid one here .from aat to acca very big jump
June 13, 2011 at 2:37 pm #84665AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- ☆
Paper was very difficult….written bits were quite easy….the calculations were disastrous….i dont think i would be able to pass just on written bits and some calculations….still lets hope for the best….
June 13, 2011 at 2:38 pm #84666The paper was okay, though time pressure had it’s place.
Like someone mentioned above, intrestingly topics that were mostly expected , didn’t show up 🙂 And those that are usually not studied in depth were examined in many questions : like pricing ..i have a feeling , pricing was everywhere 😀
Quite fair and independant discussional bits , this is the only thing i hope for :))
As for calculations, won’t make any conclusions now, let’s wait for results 🙂June 13, 2011 at 2:38 pm #84667AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
It as a very difficult exam with the ‘non typical’ areas of F5….
June 13, 2011 at 2:43 pm #84668This exam was so easy, I’m completely suprised; I was well prepared for all the questions.
June 13, 2011 at 2:44 pm #84669AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
TPAR that was challenging I stumbled on the flexed budget except that It was okay
June 13, 2011 at 2:44 pm #84670AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
Questionable
Attempted
Q5 – Throughput – easy marks
Q3 – Budget – Easy marks
others – very trickyJune 13, 2011 at 2:45 pm #84671It was hard for me. Even I have done all the questions , but it was still not an easy paper to do. Hope I have done enough. Good Luck everyone.
June 13, 2011 at 2:46 pm #84672I could not do the flexed budget well, but i hope i pass……. I did the best I could do, cos I had issues getting to the exam hall
June 13, 2011 at 2:47 pm #84673I could not do the flexed budget very well, but I hope I pass……
June 13, 2011 at 2:47 pm #84674AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
Very difficult. The examiner chose very difficult questions. They are trying to make a point that you have to know everything. Which is pretty ridiculous given the size of the syllabus. The fundamentals should be challenged in each paper. They purposefully ignored and tested the more obscure stuff. I mean flexed budget?! I dont think thats been tested in the last 4 years?! Yet no ABC or Solving simultaneous questions. Arse!
June 13, 2011 at 2:51 pm #84675I said a prayer this morning and then did some last minute revision – on sales mix variances and on pricing. I cannot believe that they both showed up.
Throughput on the other hand was tough – especially the practical element. I gave every bit a good shot but I know I failed the question.
Flex budget was nice and easy if you picked out the information and just systematically hacked at it.. It would have appeared hard if you took any other approach. I might have got a calculation wrong but I was very clear with my workings and my approach.
Risk and uncertainty was unexpected but the same applies. I saw it in BPP revision notes and was able to tackle it.
I am really happy with my luck and the paper and to tell you the truth, I’d rather be lucky than good because as you will realise when you do a professional level exam, there is too much information to know every last bit of the syllabus.
June 13, 2011 at 2:51 pm #84676last was better than this… well i hope for my pass anyway.. Inshallah
June 13, 2011 at 3:00 pm #84678AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
I have some to the conclusion that the key to passing this exam is luck. It is a very
broad syllabus therefore impossible to cover everything well!Maybe I’m just feeling sorry for myself as I have studied but not in the right areas. The past exam papers were no help!
June 13, 2011 at 3:01 pm #84679AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- ☆
I thought this exam was hard although I did attempt each question, I wrote about the building blocks rather than the balanced scorecard but hope that as they are almost the same that will be ok !!!
I think that in every calculation there was abit to trip you up and I’m sure that I did trip up in each one !!!! but hoping that I’ll get a few marks on each.
I managed ok with the Flexed budget because of the lectures on Open Tuition !!!
Throughput calculation I used what they had used to divide and get Ratio !!!
All my calculations seemed just a bit out to what they told you further on in the scenio’s !!!
Oh well thats last exam this sitting so can now have a life back for a few months !!!June 13, 2011 at 3:04 pm #84680AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 3
- ☆
that was difficult I was about to weep
June 13, 2011 at 3:04 pm #84681AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 3
- ☆
NO.5 was too too tricky !
June 13, 2011 at 3:08 pm #84682AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 3
- ☆
June 13, 2011 at 3:09 pm #84683AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
new examiner = new style of questions…
such a disaster where is classic variance analysis, abc costing, linear programing???Questions were too unexpected??
June 13, 2011 at 3:11 pm #84684AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 11
- ☆
I’m glad most people agree that this paper was difficult. I thought it was just me! There were very obscure areas of the syllabus all examined in this paper. Pay off tables, expected values, flexed budget. These haven’t been examined for years. Calculation part was really tricky, theory not as bad. I dont’t think I will pass. Already failed this paper in Dec so I really wanted to pass this time.
Ann Irons – you are killing me!!!
June 13, 2011 at 3:22 pm #84685AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- ☆
This exam was the worst I have ever sat. I did so much revision, but just couldn’t get my head round maximin etc and demand and hoped they wouldn’t come up……….my gamble didn’t pay off! I just hope I did well enough on the other 3 questions to scrape a pass (fingers crossed X) I thought Q5 was easy tho’ a brilliant straightforward throughput question.
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘*** F5 June 2011 Exam was … Post your comments here and vote in Instant Poll ***’ is closed to new replies.