- This topic has 688 replies, 98 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by
.
- Posts
I done them wrong I think.
Both my answer were above 1
I should get marks for the Mathon I think at least 2 out 6
The question just baffled me up. First part was literally define bottle neck and 2nd part I was like wow haha. Never heard of this before so I ignored the question and instead calculated normal tpar
Yeah, points will be given for right approach. I did not multiply 2400 by 3 though
My main concern is question 4 svorecard. Part 1 was acceptable, but i did not put enough effort for part 2 due to lack of time
Yea I realised yesterday there was 3 seniors haha.
I think I got too carried away with the balance scored card question.
But I don’t think u have to divided the time of seniors instead multiply them you know! Coz 1 senior was there for 2700 hour than times 2 more
Balance score card question was good.
Financial
Internal
Innovation learning
Customersand literally describe them
Maximising shareholder wealth
Process of the coming/ staff
How well prepared for future, new products
And reputation of company amongst customersBoom 6 marks
2nd part was literally just give a goal, how can yiu measure it and why did u choose it.
3 separate columns
I done 2 goals each just in case!!
Haha
Wrote almost the same 😀 regarding tpars, will they give us points if at least our formulas were right? Considering the fact we did not mulptiply 2400 by 3
I messed second part of question 4, still think they ll give me some points
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
Hi,
While studying the topic it looked extremely easy…in the exam I was dumb struck 🙂
I tackled it by applying to the quantities each equation and realized that the one at answer b was returning the cost stated in the question only for the lowest and the highest quantity..so..tadaaa..the answer:)We should get at least 2 in my opinion for the method
Coz I remember my tutor told me wrote anything. Just don’t leave it blank.
U still get marks for it.
I guess that Q2 was just bad
And Q1 part b Eww I just wrote quicker didn’t do no calculation haha.
That’s wrongAgree on question 2, but, as you say, we will get something. 2 marks for part b and some marks for part a of that question. Question 1 i did great 😀
Sam, did you get exactly 9455 on wuestion 3 and then added ten percent or what?
I did add 10 parts of the apportion overhead.
But I don’t think we were suppose to coz that would have been there regardless as it’s fixed cost. And only fixed costs which change get added on.
I mean worse comes to worse probably lose 1 or maybe 2 marks
The trick was that the supervisors salary which was fixed. So that would have been zero
And plus the 20 hours which he spend at the price of 12 I think we’re incremental
The biggest trick was the semi skilled labour I think the cheapest price was the firm providing 14 as they had to work overtime and there was no spare capacity
- The topic ‘*** F5 December 2014 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***’ is closed to new replies.