Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA LW Corporate and Business Law Forums › *** F4 June 2013 Exam was.. Post your comments ***
- This topic has 107 replies, 67 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- June 10, 2013 at 9:05 am #130960June 10, 2013 at 10:20 am #130974
hey guys.! what questions came in UK variant? goodluck
June 10, 2013 at 10:26 am #130975Hey guys!!!! what came up in Global variant? Good Luck
June 10, 2013 at 11:07 am #130980AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 3
- ☆
Hy F4(GLO) candidate what about ur xm?
What topics touch that xm?
best of luck…June 10, 2013 at 11:55 am #130986hy guys…can any 1 tel me da all qus uk varient..???
June 10, 2013 at 12:43 pm #131277any one want to share what came up in F4 Global variant
June 10, 2013 at 1:24 pm #131281hey guys what came in english variant??
June 10, 2013 at 1:50 pm #131291bribery ?
causion negligence?
track system of courts?
i do only 70% paper very bad. dont be acccept that type of paper
June 10, 2013 at 2:07 pm #131294English Var
1. Structure of Courts in the UK
1.b Track system in the UKSorry cant remember question by question!
Torts of negligence, Bribery Act, Doctrine of Privity,9. Articles of Association and amendments
10. Partnership Act 1890June 10, 2013 at 2:44 pm #131311AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
Unidroit & uncitral
Bills of Ladin & bill of exchange
Bribery
Dividends
Partnerships
Duties of directors
AOA
Anticipatory beach
Global variantJune 10, 2013 at 2:49 pm #131318I found this paper (F4 UK) farely easy compared to F5 and F9.
just hope I can get I good mark out of it.June 10, 2013 at 2:51 pm #131320AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 3
- ☆
can anyone tell how the distribution was to be made in the partnership question?… GLOBAL VARIANT
June 10, 2013 at 3:07 pm #131330AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
<cite> @arslan9898 said:</cite>
bribery ?causion negligence?
track system of courts?
i do only 70% paper very bad. dont be acccept that type of paper
Same here- causation negligence? Cant even find that in Kaplan’s notes.
Bribery- didnt cover in any detail in class. Think i have failed…June 10, 2013 at 3:11 pm #131332English paper
Civil courts structure and tracking system
Doctrine of privity and intention to create legal relations
Tort of negligence – causation, ‘but for’ rule and novus actus interveniens
Common law duties of employer and employee
Removal of director (ltd company), change to articles, dismissal of company secretary
Rules of distributing dividends
Existing contractual duty
Bribery
Duties of directorsJune 10, 2013 at 3:18 pm #131334@Mikelittle:
Thanks for all your lectures and tips!!!June 10, 2013 at 3:18 pm #131335AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
causation, ‘but for’ rule and novus actus interveniens!!!!!!???
never saw that in my life..i think i totally messed up..esp q3 n q5.June 10, 2013 at 3:32 pm #131343AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
thanks to Open Tuition for all your very wise, free teaching and advice 🙂
June 10, 2013 at 3:41 pm #131349global variant
q1-uncitral-6 marks -undroit 4marks,
q2) debenture(it included 3 parts)….dont remember:p
q3- bribery-(2 marks),terms(6 marks),safe oneself (2 marks)
q4 seller duties regarding quality of goods
q5 award when can be award cooomnce and court aaction against award made.
q6 directr dutie…duty to promote succes(4 marsk),the duty to act fair and with care (3 marks),duty to avoid conflict of interest(3 marks)
q7 bill of lading and exchange 5:5 marks
q8 antispatory beach of contrct
q9 aoa…when sectry coommiteted insider dealing..
q10 partnership-payment prefrence at time of liquidationJune 10, 2013 at 3:42 pm #131351AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 17
- ☆
can any one tell the answer of question no.3??? (Causation, but for test, Reasons Doctorine of Novus Actus Intervenians not applying)
June 10, 2013 at 3:53 pm #131357Guys, causation is only 2 marks worth, so if you wrote at least something, hopefully half of marks available (1 mark) you get. I wrote completely absurd in tracking system in a courts, and defence for bribery. hopefully the rest is fine. We’ll see…
June 10, 2013 at 4:05 pm #131361AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- ☆
That causation question was not a fair question! I looked all all my notes, no one mentions it anywhere……..not even once was that term used anywhere.
June 10, 2013 at 4:09 pm #131365Global variant, a little different from tabsom’s : )
1. UNCITRAL, UNIDROIT
2. UNCITRAL, Internetional Court of Arbitration ??
3. Obligations of the seller on quality requirements under UNCISG
4. Bribery act: the meaning; four offences; defence of adequate procedures
5. Dividends: ways of funding; particularities for plc; consequences when paid dividence not under the law
6. Directors duties: 1) duty to promote success; 2) to act with skills, care, due diligence; 3) to avoid conflicts of interest
7. Bills of landing; bills of exchange
8. UNCISG Anticipatory breach of contract.
9. Removal of a director / company secretary: 1) remove a director at GM; 2) terminate agreement with company secretary; 3) change articles and require one member to sell his shares to another three members
10. Partneship – payment of outstanding debt on liquidationJune 10, 2013 at 4:14 pm #131367<cite>@faaezam said:</cite>
can anyone tell how the distribution was to be made in the partnership question?… GLOBAL VARIANTMy thoughts:) :
Current outstanding balance is $10,000 ($9,000 to external users plus $1,000 to Ham). And Jo (? – who introduced capital only $1,000) can’t be granted release from obligations. So all three partners should pay in total $5,000 according to their initial proportion (60%, 30%, 10%). What did you answer and what do you think??June 10, 2013 at 4:25 pm #131374<cite>@thapapoonam said:</cite>
causation, ‘but for’ rule and novus actus interveniens!!!!!!???
never saw that in my life..i think i totally messed up..esp q3 n q5.neither did I see ‘but for’ rule… it is what?
I have forgotten all the past cases names, I wrote only 2 or 3… is that sufficient to pass?June 10, 2013 at 4:32 pm #131377BPP Revision kit mentions the same question on Causation and But for test.
I struggled with time..never thought I would struggle with time as mock papers were fine when I wrote at home..
Never mind. Hope for the best 🙂
Needed more time for scenario based questions… - AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.