- This topic has 107 replies, 67 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by
.
- Posts
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 3
- ☆
Hy F4(GLO) candidate what about ur xm?
What topics touch that xm?
best of luck…bribery ?
causion negligence?
track system of courts?
i do only 70% paper very bad. dont be acccept that type of paper
English Var
1. Structure of Courts in the UK
1.b Track system in the UKSorry cant remember question by question!
Torts of negligence, Bribery Act, Doctrine of Privity,9. Articles of Association and amendments
10. Partnership Act 1890- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
Unidroit & uncitral
Bills of Ladin & bill of exchange
Bribery
Dividends
Partnerships
Duties of directors
AOA
Anticipatory beach
Global variantI found this paper (F4 UK) farely easy compared to F5 and F9.
just hope I can get I good mark out of it.- Topics: 0
- Replies: 3
- ☆
can anyone tell how the distribution was to be made in the partnership question?… GLOBAL VARIANT
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
<cite> @arslan9898 said:</cite>
bribery ?causion negligence?
track system of courts?
i do only 70% paper very bad. dont be acccept that type of paper
Same here- causation negligence? Cant even find that in Kaplan’s notes.
Bribery- didnt cover in any detail in class. Think i have failed…English paper
Civil courts structure and tracking system
Doctrine of privity and intention to create legal relations
Tort of negligence – causation, ‘but for’ rule and novus actus interveniens
Common law duties of employer and employee
Removal of director (ltd company), change to articles, dismissal of company secretary
Rules of distributing dividends
Existing contractual duty
Bribery
Duties of directors@Mikelittle:
Thanks for all your lectures and tips!!!- Topics: 0
- Replies: 4
- ☆
causation, ‘but for’ rule and novus actus interveniens!!!!!!???
never saw that in my life..i think i totally messed up..esp q3 n q5.- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
thanks to Open Tuition for all your very wise, free teaching and advice 🙂
global variant
q1-uncitral-6 marks -undroit 4marks,
q2) debenture(it included 3 parts)….dont remember:p
q3- bribery-(2 marks),terms(6 marks),safe oneself (2 marks)
q4 seller duties regarding quality of goods
q5 award when can be award cooomnce and court aaction against award made.
q6 directr dutie…duty to promote succes(4 marsk),the duty to act fair and with care (3 marks),duty to avoid conflict of interest(3 marks)
q7 bill of lading and exchange 5:5 marks
q8 antispatory beach of contrct
q9 aoa…when sectry coommiteted insider dealing..
q10 partnership-payment prefrence at time of liquidation- Topics: 0
- Replies: 17
- ☆
can any one tell the answer of question no.3??? (Causation, but for test, Reasons Doctorine of Novus Actus Intervenians not applying)
Guys, causation is only 2 marks worth, so if you wrote at least something, hopefully half of marks available (1 mark) you get. I wrote completely absurd in tracking system in a courts, and defence for bribery. hopefully the rest is fine. We’ll see…
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- ☆
That causation question was not a fair question! I looked all all my notes, no one mentions it anywhere……..not even once was that term used anywhere.
Global variant, a little different from tabsom’s : )
1. UNCITRAL, UNIDROIT
2. UNCITRAL, Internetional Court of Arbitration ??
3. Obligations of the seller on quality requirements under UNCISG
4. Bribery act: the meaning; four offences; defence of adequate procedures
5. Dividends: ways of funding; particularities for plc; consequences when paid dividence not under the law
6. Directors duties: 1) duty to promote success; 2) to act with skills, care, due diligence; 3) to avoid conflicts of interest
7. Bills of landing; bills of exchange
8. UNCISG Anticipatory breach of contract.
9. Removal of a director / company secretary: 1) remove a director at GM; 2) terminate agreement with company secretary; 3) change articles and require one member to sell his shares to another three members
10. Partneship – payment of outstanding debt on liquidation<cite>@faaezam said:</cite>
can anyone tell how the distribution was to be made in the partnership question?… GLOBAL VARIANTMy thoughts:) :
Current outstanding balance is $10,000 ($9,000 to external users plus $1,000 to Ham). And Jo (? – who introduced capital only $1,000) can’t be granted release from obligations. So all three partners should pay in total $5,000 according to their initial proportion (60%, 30%, 10%). What did you answer and what do you think??<cite>@thapapoonam said:</cite>
causation, ‘but for’ rule and novus actus interveniens!!!!!!???
never saw that in my life..i think i totally messed up..esp q3 n q5.neither did I see ‘but for’ rule… it is what?
I have forgotten all the past cases names, I wrote only 2 or 3… is that sufficient to pass?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.