- This topic has 65 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by
.
- Posts
@kolkleen said:
Market rule relates to measure of damages. Remoteness has to do with losses arising naturally and constructive knowledge of lossIt’s confusing~ Hopefully I can pass…
I hope to get a 50 marks in MCQ so i have not to worry anymore with the discussion 🙂
Btw, here’s my answers;1. B
2. B
3. C
4. B
5. C
6. A
7. D
8. B
9. B
10. B
11. B
12. A
13. A
14. D
15. B
16. B
17. A
18. C
19. A
20. A
21. C
22. B
23. B
24. C
25. D
26. A
27. C
28. B
29. C
30. D
31. A
32. D
33. D
34. C
35. A
36. D
37. A
38. C
39. D
40. A
41. A
42. B
43. B
44. A
45. B- Topics: 0
- Replies: 171
- ☆☆
@jombeetupas said:
I hope no trick in this question because for me it’s an invitation to treat. And it’s the discretion of Ann to accept or not the offers. And post rule is not applied here since advertisement is not an offer. Therefore, no agreement or contract has been established except for the one who truly a legal buyer.yea, I didn’t read that comment well; its not unilateral but I think its an offer
@jombeetupas said:
Hi. Do we have suggested answers now for MCQs?Right there with you. I have been looking for Mike’s answers refreshing the site every 30 mins for a day lol!
I dont think the exam (Eng) was that hard,,, but some of the MCQ were i bit tricky…anyways hopin for a reasonable passing grade……..
NB. i chose mitigation too and am 95% its rit…..@gazeboz said:
Right there with you. I have been looking for Mike’s answers refreshing the site every 30 mins for a day lol!Funny but i did the same. The longer the time of waiting, the more i’m eager to know the result. Lol
@jombeetupas said:
Funny but i did the same. The longer the time of waiting, the more i’m eager to know the result. Lolpretty sure we have 40%/ 70% for Section A each, I looked at your answers 🙂
@gazeboz said:
pretty sure we have 40%/ 70% for Section A each, I looked at your answers 🙂Wow. Nice to know that. 80% chance of passing.
@jombeetupas said:
Wow. Nice to know that. 80% chance of passing.It’s cool with MCQs bc you can figure out how well/poor you have done. I wish ACCA would get with the times and instead of old school written exams they did computerized typed exams. It would be way easier to type than writing longform 🙁
@turbulencija said:
Which variant is that Ana?Pretty certain hers is Eng
@ana2889 said:
my answers are for ENG :-), sorry I forgot to sayLooking forward to seeing Mike Little’s suggested answers, are you?
@gazeboz said:
Looking forward to seeing Mike Little’s suggested answers, are you?Oh Mr. Mike where are you? Can you give us what we need please…? lol
But seriously, I think the reason why Mr. Mike has no plans yet of giving his suggested answers is because with MCQs alone, a candidate would know if he/she passed the exam. And truly, it would spoil everything.
Haha all three of us are dying here! I felt confident with the paper how about you two (Ana and Jombee)?
@ana2889 said:
me too! I compared mine with yours answers and we have the same for 32 points…lol that means we are either both right or both wrong!! 🙂
@gazeboz said:
Haha all three of us are dying here! I felt confident with the paper how about you two (Ana and Jombee)?I find the exam not really difficult so I hope it would result to good marks too. I’m really praying for it. 🙂
I took the F4 English variant in CBE format. I passed it. the questions were a bit tricky so you had to think. The way in which the questions were asked tend to confuse you, but they were not strange. Everything on the exam was from the text – no strange terms or anything that I never read. It was just good.
All the cases/scenarios were the same ones I listened to from the ACCAopentuition tutor. Thank you opentuition. Thank you Mike Little!We have posted OpenTuition Suggested Answers
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 3
- ☆
Nice job!!!
Will you post for GLO version?
Thank you for posting the answers!
Could you please explain why you treat the answer on question 38 as B?
thank you
“38 In relation to the tort of negligence, which TWO of the following criteria are required to establish the existence of
a duty of care?
(1) The claimant suffered a financial loss
(2) The harm suffered was reasonably foreseeable
(3) A relationship of proximity existed between the parties
(4) The claimant did not consent to cause the injury suffered
A (1) and (2)
B (1) and (3)
C (2) and (3)
D (2) and (4)”
- The topic ‘*** F4 December 2014 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***’ is closed to new replies.