Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Examiners answers
- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 3 years ago by
John Moffat.
- AuthorPosts
- April 20, 2021 at 10:47 am #618285
Hello
Sir do we have to write same length answer in exam as examiner has written in its suggested solutions?
April 20, 2021 at 4:20 pm #618312No. The examiner always write much more than it expected from students. It is the same for all of the ACCA exams, and is because the examiner know that people learn from the answers. Also, the examiner usually lists more points than are required for the marks – you can see this from the marking plan at the end of the exam answers 🙂
April 20, 2021 at 7:40 pm #618327Sir e.g in the below June 17 Q2 c ii, Assess how behavioural factors may affect the share price of Bournelorth Co. Exmainer has written below answer for 5 marks, and in his marking scheme he has mentioned upto 2 marks per well explained point.
So in the below answer, if I write the first 3 paras of examiner’s answer then would it be sufficient to score 5 marks?Bournelorth Co’s share price may be significantly influenced by the impact of behavioural factors, as it is a newly listed company operating in a sector where returns have traditionally been variable and unpredictable. The impact of behavioural factors may be complex, and they may exert both upward and downward pressures on Bournelorth Co’s share price. Investors may, for example, compensate for not knowing much about Bournelorth Co by anchoring, which means using information which is irrelevant, but which they do have, to judge investment in Bournelorth Co.
The possibility of very high returns may add to the appeal of Bournelorth Co’s shares. Some investors may want the opportunity of obtaining high returns even if it is not very likely that they will. The IT sector has also been subject to herd behaviour, notably in the dotcom boom. The herd effect is when a large number of investors have taken the same decision, for example to invest in a particular sector, and this influences others to conform and take the same decision.
However, even if Bournelorth Co produces high returns for some time, the fact that it is in a volatile sector may lead to investors selling shares before it appears to be warranted on the evidence, on the grounds that by the laws of chance. Bournelorth Co will make a loss eventually (known as the gambler’s fallacy).
Under behavioural finance, the possible volatility of Bournelorth Co’s results may lead to downward pressure on its share price for various reasons. First some investors have regret aversion, a general bias against making a loss anyway. This, it is claimed, means that the level of returns on equity is rather higher than the returns on debt than is warranted by a rational view of the risk of equity.
Similarly under prospect theory, investors are more likely to choose a net outcome which consists entirely of small gains, rather than an identical net outcome which consists of a combination of larger gains and some losses. At present also, Bournelorth Co does not have much of a history of results for the market to analyse. Even when it has been listed for some time, however, another aspect of behavioural finance is investors placing excessive weight on the most recent results.
If the market reacts very well or badly to news about Bournelorth Co, the large rise or fall in the share price which results may also not be sustainable, but may revert back over time.
April 21, 2021 at 7:59 am #618354You didn’t need to type out the whole answer here – I have all past exam question and answers
🙂However – yes that would get you the 5 marks (and you wouldn’t need to type each paragraph in as much detail either).
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.